Ironracer
Gearhead
Lol... the latest and greatest, fancy pants dance junk? Nah!Ironically It was the worst.
Lol... the latest and greatest, fancy pants dance junk? Nah!Ironically It was the worst.
Yes, I have a license because someone tested me.But you have a license.
Yes, I have a license because someone tested me.
They tested to see if I knew what I was talking about. I did, so I got the qualification..
But then again, maybe I don't have a license, I don't have a shop.. maybe I'm just a 12 year old, winding up old farts like you on the internet for sport, while my friends sit around drinking Lemonade laughing at you..
.You need to be tested. Your friends mean nothing to me. If they hang with a clown like you that says all I need to know.
Go test something
.
Dam yellow rose settle down.
All of the guys that spout data with no backup paperwork or public record etc. have run off most of us folks that do test and have current and empirical data. Sad state of affairs IMO. I used to publish my findings for free. Now it's $100/hr shop rate phone or in person.
While I agree with allot of what you are saying this statement is a broad brush and could be applied to most of the people commenting on this forum including the ones that agreed with you!, that IS a factAll of the guys that spout data with no backup paperwork or public record etc. have run off most of us folks that do test and have current and empirical data. Sad state of affairs IMO. I used to publish my findings for free. Now it's $100/hr shop rate phone or in person. Surely people would love to hear all about your weekend bracket racing (booooooring lol) over relevant and current technical data.
Lastly, the margin of error on a dyno combined with ambient conditions (i.e. morning to night) would be enough to account for 80% of the tq/hp variance.
Turn off the idiot box!
There are some on here that have credentials and have shared writings in various forums and magazines. and some that have run in the 8's 20 years ago.While I agree with allot of what you are saying this statement is a broad brush and could be applied to most of the people commenting on this forum including the ones that agreed with you!, that IS a fact
There are some on here that have credentials and have shared writings in various forums and magazines. and some that have run in the 8's 20 years ago.
They have nothing to prove, if they want to share it's up to them.
I for one don't give a hoot either way, it's all good.
This is just hilarious...That’s just it. The squealers wanting data never post it.
My testing was done over 20 years ago. The dyno sheets from that junk were split between the guy who bought the short block and the kid and his dad that bought the top end. Why would I keep that?
On top of that, you can bet that IF I posted the dyno sheets, the same sniveling dolts would ***** because they were 20 plus years old.
I really don’t care who believes what. I’ve done the testing. What pisses me off is it’s he same several idiots who NEVER post **** that they do, or have done but are the first to criticize everything.
It gets old. Then you get the coat tail riders who get into a thread for no other reason than to run their mouths. It’s stupid.
Oh and one other thing, whenever you are banned, the shitfight ratio drops way down on this forum..
That's something to consider while your ranting on about others..