1967 'cuda
Dropped on Head as a Baby
Law enforcement is essential. Without it there wouldn't be anything in place to protect defenseless people from criminals. But members of law enforcement should be held accountable for their actions the same as any other member of society.
I have known officers that I had complete trust in. They did their jobs trying to maintain peace and order. I have also known officers that felt they were above the law. They used their positions to bully and intimidate people. You were safe from them as long as you were someone with enough prestige that they didn't want to risk getting themselves into trouble.
Any blanket statement that infers that all cops are bad or that all are good is ludicrous. The truth is that both exist.
In the case that barbee cites, the question that needs to be answered is whether or not the officer's actions were justified.
In most small rural communities major crimes seldom happen. Most people know one another. The use of deadly force is rarely needed. That doesn't mean that there isn't a need for it in certain cases.
My belief is that deadly force should only be used if someone is posing a deadly threat to someone else.
There seems to be a flood of videos that have been popping up lately that show excessive force used by police. - Many where citizens are killed that weren't posing a threat to anyone. Common sense tells you that only a fraction of these types of incidents are caught on camera.
I don't know if this shooting was justified. If the same standard was applied to this police officer as the general public, they'd almost certainly have been arrested. That doesn't necessarily mean that I think they should have been arrested but it goes to show that the double standard exists.
As long as law enforcement is not held to the same standards as everyone else, people will have just cause to question these cases.
I have known officers that I had complete trust in. They did their jobs trying to maintain peace and order. I have also known officers that felt they were above the law. They used their positions to bully and intimidate people. You were safe from them as long as you were someone with enough prestige that they didn't want to risk getting themselves into trouble.
Any blanket statement that infers that all cops are bad or that all are good is ludicrous. The truth is that both exist.
In the case that barbee cites, the question that needs to be answered is whether or not the officer's actions were justified.
In most small rural communities major crimes seldom happen. Most people know one another. The use of deadly force is rarely needed. That doesn't mean that there isn't a need for it in certain cases.
My belief is that deadly force should only be used if someone is posing a deadly threat to someone else.
There seems to be a flood of videos that have been popping up lately that show excessive force used by police. - Many where citizens are killed that weren't posing a threat to anyone. Common sense tells you that only a fraction of these types of incidents are caught on camera.
I don't know if this shooting was justified. If the same standard was applied to this police officer as the general public, they'd almost certainly have been arrested. That doesn't necessarily mean that I think they should have been arrested but it goes to show that the double standard exists.
As long as law enforcement is not held to the same standards as everyone else, people will have just cause to question these cases.
Last edited: