Stop in for a cup of coffee

-
dukeboy_318 said:
:lol: That's too much work for me anyway
Click to expand...
Easy enough...

2C001E0F-C679-4E62-B931-C6D09BC271C6.jpeg
 
krazykuda said:
I just found out about this guy who is also in north west Indiana...

Eddie is getting a little frustrated with John Cope....

I think I will try this guy next...

727Specialist

View attachment 1715163909
Click to expand...
I'm looking at doing a write up about the difference between the PB and the regular. There's a junkyard with several cars with complete drive trains in them, I need to go yank a trans from one
 
I read up a bit, saw a bit of the discussion about chrome. Does anyone know anything about superfineshine? They are located not to far from me.
 
Ddaddy said:
I get about 20,000+ emails per year at work. That’s about 125 per day. Often there are at least 20 when I open my inbox every few hours.

There are two ways to approach this kind of volume, tactical and strategic.

The tactical way means opening each one starting with the oldest and replying to them one at a time until you get through them all. This often means you are giving an irrelevant reply to a string of emails that has moved far beyond the first one, making you look clueless or just plain late to the party with nothing to offer. You also waste time responding to low priority ones while the important ones wait for you to get to them.

The strategic way means opening and reading all new emails before responding to any. This way you are up to speed on the latest responses and can prioritize which ones to respond to first and which can wait, maximizing your efficiency and effectiveness.

It is the difference between playing checkers...and playing chess.
Click to expand...
yep, I try to catch up the back read hitting quote as I go. Then delete the ones that have become irrelevant already and reply to what's left
 
Ddaddy said:
I get about 20,000+ emails per year at work. That’s about 125 per day. Often there are at least 20 when I open my inbox every few hours.

There are two ways to approach this kind of volume, tactical and strategic.

The tactical way means opening each one starting with the oldest and replying to them one at a time until you get through them all. This often means you are giving an irrelevant reply to a string of emails that has moved far beyond the first one, making you look clueless or just plain late to the party with nothing to offer. You also waste time responding to low priority ones while the important ones wait for you to get to them.

The strategic way means opening and reading all new emails before responding to any. This way you are up to speed on the latest responses and can prioritize which ones to respond to first and which can wait, maximizing your efficiency and effectiveness.

It is the difference between playing checkers...and playing chess.
Click to expand...

But if you read them first, then go back, you have to read them over again to answer... Time waster...


zkx14 said:
yep, I try to catch up the back read hitting quote as I go. Then delete the ones that have become irrelevant already and reply to what's left
Click to expand...

That sounds more efficient....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top