T56MaxTorq
Well-Known Member
It’s all about the sheet metal on a Mopar, not the engine.
That's what some dumbass schooled me on at the last car show I went to.
He says they were the most gutless unreliable POS ever made.
I didn't contest his opinion, because what would be the point?
Who cares what one man's opinion is and what facts did he base it on? I have people all the time looking at my stock Duster and almost all tell me how fast these cars were back in the day. One guy told me he had a transplanted 427 in his 67 Chevelle and there was a 340 Duster he could never beat. Be proud for what you have. A 454 Ls6 is great, the 455 Stage 1 maybe better, the new Hellcat better yet, the Hellcat Demon even better...etc etcThat's what some dumbass schooled me on at the last car show I went to.
He says they were the most gutless unreliable POS ever made.
I didn't contest his opinion, because what would be the point?
Be careful about knocking on Buick, after all they made one of the fastest muscle you could buy in 1970, some say the fastest. As for the 340 who cares what people think I've had people roll there eyes at me when I tell them im building a 64 cuda, and I could give a F$%k less what they think. ROCK ON 340Maybe he was confusing it with the Buick 340 engine! Had a high school friend that had one in a Buick Wildcat, probably about a 67 model. Recall beating up on him a lot with my 318.
I was around when they came out. We called them “giant killers” for a reason.
For one the lt1 is a solid lifter cam.
For two it has ten more cubic inches .
If you want to compare truly make them the same !
Then you want to campare a 396 big block.
It's not apples to apples !
I tespect your knowledge, and experience , as with many others on here.
I just disagree with your comparison.
I was never afraid of most corvettes. Most couldn't drive and were suckers and posers.
I could give two craps for any 350 Chevy, no matter what lifters it had. The 327 was the better package.
When comparing LT 1 Camaros and Vettes to 340 A bodies, lets not forget that the A bodies werent in the same class as Corvette or Camaro, and were alot more affordable. A 340 dart is comparable to an SS Nova 350, The Camaro to the E bodies, and the Corvette is a sports car, Mopar didnt have anything comparable untill the viper. What Im saying is, the 340 was the best bang for the buck, or some may call it "cheap horsepower" the guys with the LT 1's spent more $$$ Im thinking...
Frak yea baby! Sign me up for the line up!But street racing back then didn't give a **** about class. You just lined um up and did it.
One day on the road home.......stock 340 A's had a window from about 30 to 85/90. When they hit 4th gear those 3.55s almost killed them.
I ALMOST got schooled by a 68-440 Chrysler New-something (Newport?). This high school friend of mine (brother to the girl I was going out with),his Dad had this great hulking beast of brown poo with a 440 auto, and he was going on and on and on and on about how fast it was. Wanted to race me for months. Finally I caved in; 30 to 85 I said; I knew my car's limits. You guessed it, I blew that barge for two gears. Then, on the way to 85, I watched that great whaling ship start catching up.I took him by a good bit, but I seen the handwriting on the wall. My Swinger went 98 in the qtr, and I'm 100% positive, had we raced to 98, that freighter woulda schooled me that day.
Not long afterwards,I put in some 4.10s .
The small block Buick is a joke and the big block is so costly it is retarded but they will run well. The V6 turbo car is the mean machine.Maybe he was confusing it with the Buick 340 engine! Had a high school friend that had one in a Buick Wildcat, probably about a 67 model. Recall beating up on him a lot with my 318.
I am Mopar thru and thru, BUT the BEST small block ever designed/ produced wears a Bow tie.Then you've never seen a "good" LT-1 Camaro. They were out there.
Omg, What is the world coming to ? When I guy named “Mopar Tim” makes a statement like that it makes me want to puke, lolI am Mopar thru and thru, BUT the BEST small block ever designed/ produced wears a Bow tie.
If I were not rebelling against my father, who knows I might be on the dark side. IMO the engineering on the Chevy is better, lighter and smaller package. But I have only built only a couple Chevy engines that were a serious effort. The Both ran real nice. One over 1200 HP. Big effort on that one. But sure a long way from stock. I sure do like the short timing chain, and the chain/water pump setup. So simple it is brilliant. IMO. But I do love my Mopars.Omg, What is the world coming to ? When I guy named “Mopar Tim” makes a statement like that it makes me want to puke, lol
Now that was funnyNow they tell me, after all this work, my 340 is a pos! Damn, and I haven't even fired it up yet to break in the cam.View attachment 1715187205
makes me wonder what he is driving. i might be more in tune with chevy engines but i am learning all about my new toy a 69 cuda what will have a n.o.m. 440 with a 727 auto in it but i know lots of people that love the 340 and the t/a 340 engine . i know it can and will kick a stock 350 chevy to the side when it wants. don't listen to people that are this negative or upset his blew up from abuse etc. stock or built , have fun with what ever it is installed in and enjoy the thumbs up and waves.That's what some dumbass schooled me on at the last car show I went to.
He says they were the most gutless unreliable POS ever made.
I didn't contest his opinion, because what would be the point?