Hey Schmitt,
I have been turning over the same idea for awhile. Lots of fabrication for the turbo. Seems more straightforward with a under the hood supercharger. I feel that from what I learned having EFI for forced induction is better just because a carb doesnt understand density the way an EFI system with O2 sensor can. I feel that your compression might be a little high. Lots of this info on the forced induction forum from people who have actually done it. Have you checked it out? If money wasnt a problem, personally I would go with a procharger/EFI/methanol situation and see how many MPG I could get out of a big block.......but money is a problem for me. But for you......maybe not. Got to be careful with the methanol though......corrosive?
May the forced induction be with you.
.I'd look strongly at E85 at that compression level. Methanol is fine for racing only setup.
How have you established 10.5:1 compression? What's measured cranking compression? What heads, etc?
A procharger with a hat on something like an FITech throttle body running E85 should be quite good and fit under the hood on that Sweptline. S/F...Ken M
i always liked the look of a supercharger, and there is no turbo lag with one
there is more parasitic drag though, since your driving it off of the crank
the supercharger would be easier to install for sure, but as rocco mentioned, the procharger is even easier still (it is basically only the compressor section of a turbo, mounted to a pulley instead of an impeller shaft and runs off of the crank, like a conventional supercharger does, but without the need to swap intakes. the lack of intake does mean you need to route the charged intake air into the carb)