70 318 with 340 internals/Cyl Head

-
mario03srt said:
So the answer would be.............323 cubes..........
Click to expand...
Yes
mario03srt said:
possible very low compression,
Click to expand...
Yes
mario03srt said:
better crank (good for 5-7 psi?),
Click to expand...
Good for 5-7 psi? On what? Changing the crank material is for strength. This adds no LSI anywhere on anything!
mario03srt said:
could possible bored to have a 340 piston,
Click to expand...
I call BS on anyone saying a 318 can go to a 330 bore size.
That’s 3.91 to a 4.04!!! That’s .130 over. I do t think so!
mario03srt said:
if not would require decking and/or some upgraded pistions to run well.
Click to expand...
Depends on the target of the build. You can have a fine running engine @ 7.5-1 ratio.
mario03srt said:
Better flowing head than a 318 stock piece with 2.02/1.65 valves.
Click to expand...
Let’s do some math here. 3.94 bore size, 2.05 + 1.60 = 3.65 which leaves .029 to have clearance for the valves to operate.
Ummmmmmm, not a great idea.
Besides, in all honesty, I HIGHLY doubt you’ll need a 2.05 valve in a .030-318.
mario03srt said:
Is this recommended other than the comp concerns?
Click to expand...
What is your concern specifically?
mario03srt said:
Not asking for hp estimates, usage projections, convertor sizing, DCR, etc, etc, etc.
Click to expand...
Roger that Sir!
mario03srt said:
It is what it is. It in the car. Here is a photo. Basic SBM. Some may be able to id the head, not me. That will happen Wed's and I'll have a comp gage in hand.
Click to expand...
The engine below looks good. Headers looks like standard 1-5/8. I still can’t tell what intake that is though.
mario03srt said:
View attachment 1715999452
Click to expand...
 
Here it is inside the Engine Bay. Pick Away!!!!

Duster Bay.JPEG
 
Ugh! Garbage intake! RPM it!

:mob: Still can’t see the drivers header! :poke:
 
Dang it! Hit reply with the fat finger syndrome!

Engine looks good though. Got a picture of the car?
 
Dump the old school Torker when you can.

As long as bearing clearances and end play of the crank are good, adding a super charger should be OK, no problem.
5-7 psi from a super charger is indeed about right for the OOTB parts supplied
 
So…. Supercharger and a carb or FI?
mario03srt said:
Fish,

I'm comparing a stock 1.8x 318 valve to a 2.02 340 valve diameter. Cmon Man!
Click to expand...
You wrote down a number, 2.05. I just did the math.
Now your changing goal posts on me.

mario03srt said:
Do you work for MSNBC?
Click to expand...
I’d laugh at this… because it’s funny as hell, but since your now making a political twist to things and opening up a can of worms, look in the mirror on BS talking and dumb *** goal post moving while twisting the facts and interjecting horse **** on what there think/talking about without actually saying it but leaving it to be assumed by the person replying which he will not and even more so because of the fruitless and wimpy roast attempt he made up front in the thread he started on not knowing a ******* thing but had holes of a working crystal ball.

LMAO DUDE!

You have just shown yourself as a woke *** democrat!!!!
With no ability to swim in the shi mess he started!!!

LMAO!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
Are we going to get back to the facts and actually help you out or are you going to proceed on being a dick?
 
That’s it! I’m cursing you out right now!!!!

Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump

:rofl::poke:
 
mario03srt said:
Fish,

I'm comparing a stock 1.8x 318 valve to a 2.02 340 valve diameter. Cmon Man!

Do you work for MSNBC?
Click to expand...
Where is the compare? This is what you wrote!
And my reply

mario03srt said:
Better flowing head than a 318 stock piece with 2.02/1.65 valves.
Click to expand...
Let’s do some math here. 3.94 bore size, 2.05 + 1.60 = 3.65 which leaves .029 to have clearance for the valves to operate.
Ummmmmmm, not a great idea.
Besides, in all honesty, I HIGHLY doubt you’ll need a 2.05 valve in a .030-318.
 
Come on man!!!!

Seriously?!?!?!

Then this?

mario03srt said:
Fish,

I'm comparing a stock 1.8x 318 valve to a 2.02 340 valve diameter. Cmon Man!

Do you work for MSNBC?
 
Dang dude! Your throwing stones at your own glass house.
 
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.................No I'm a Republican. Your twisting of things and overlooking details and commenting negatively, reminds me of the douchebag media.
 
I’m trying to help but your twisting and moving goal posts as I have shown and can do a few more times in YOUR OWN THREAD!

Since this is what I see as a snowflake melting, I’m out and wish you the best.

I hope in the future your much more direct and precise in your questions and direction of your questions.

Best of luck with your car & build.

I’m out.
 
Is the balancer neutral balance? That is the only thing you are going to be able to see. Guy says this and that is inside the engine but no way to know other then if its neutral balance or not and head castings. Receipts for any parts or machine shop?

If you like the car and it runs good buy it. I would be far more concerned about hidden rust excessive bondo ect ect ect.
 
The Car had a complete frame on restoration. Minus the exterior paint. Well on the rear quarters it was matched. I'll get up a pic. New stock suspension w/SS springs, new fuel system, new interior, alum radiator, AAR Hood, new floor pan, 8 3/4 SG w/ 3.55, rear 1/2 quarters, old school slotted alum wheels on BFG's, new brakes, you get the idea. 59k miles if I remember. Paint on front fenders has some petina. Totally straight and is a turn key car.

8 3_4 Diff.JPEG
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top