Yup. 6.1 Hemi convertible
Thanks Gerald. All these finishing details seem to take a huge amount of time!!Grill grates, eyebrows and all are spot on! Nice work!!!
Not surprised at all!
Haven't had time to get back on the Cuda for quite a while due to yard work etc and a bucket list trip to East Africa!!!
Fired the engine for the first time a couple of weeks ago. Just used a carb because I wanted to be sure it started right up to get the revs up and break in the cam.
Had some small leaks at one tranny fitting at the rad and some at the heater hose connections at the firewall. Did a search to see what others had done about leaks here since I've had problems with these fittings in the past. The consensus seems to be it is a combination of poor quality spring clamps (ie not strong enough) and the repro hoses are thinner than the originals. Thus not enough clamping force.
I saw one neat idea and that was to use some small gear clamps (along with the original style spring clamps) , paint them black and put heat shrink over part of the threaded section. I think it looks pretty good and you can't really tell they are there unless you look close.
I didn't see any nasty looking bits on the oil filter, so hopefully the cam broke in OK.
Now I can start the installation of the Holley Sniper and Hyperspark CD ignition.
View attachment 1716014792
View attachment 1716014793
View attachment 1716014794
View attachment 1716014795
View attachment 1716014796
Nice condition on your engine compartmentBack at the Cuda again!!!
A couple of things I has seen mentioned on the Holley Sniper forum was low voltage.
1. Low voltage on the +12V Key on feed to the sniper when cranking. Apparently anything below 11 volts causes problems on starting. I connected the IGN1 feed to the sniper feed and then cranked the engine. Sure enough, the voltage was below 11V. (The IGN1 also connects to the voltage regulator which pulls the voltage down)
I made a wiring mod to add a relay to ensure I had a >12V supply to the sniper as well as the voltage regulator.
2. The forum also mentioned low voltage conditions when idling with headlights and heater on etc. The stock alternator does not put out sufficient voltage under high load and idle speeds. I've now swapped out the original alternator for a Powermaster 7018. Powermaster 7018 Powermaster Retro Alternators | Summit Racing Hopefully that will solve this problem.
View attachment 1716058122
View attachment 1716058123
Looking at your front reflector bezels, mine dont look like that, with a deep inset at the top. But then again my 69 notch started as a basket case missing almost everything. I picked up 2 sets of 69 dart front fender bezels to use. Figured those were correct. A few years back I found a 69 fury in the boneyard, it had one deep bezel, and one not deep bezel on it. Looked like a factory assembly line screw up that nobody noticed since they were original to the car. I sold those since they didnt match. Kinda wondering if either one would have been correct to use. It appears that your bezel angles the reflector more straight. My dart bezels would angle the reflector more down than straight. May have been a thing needed for it to pass DOT regs with the fender curvature? A different bezel.Blasted and painted all the bumper brackets, license plate bracket etc and got the front bumper installed.
View attachment 1715939320
View attachment 1715939321
Holley now sells LED headlamps that look like old sealed beams. You can get them with bright white, or the older yellowish glow white light. If using these which have a lot lower amp draw, couldent you get away from having to do headlight relays? BTW I'm thoroughly enjoying watching your build thread.
the deep insert ones are correct for the front so that the reflector is more vertical. Plus the part number is 2930751 front and 2930 757 for the rear. Interesting about the Fury. Just goes to show anything is possible from Chrysler back in the days!!!!Looking at your front reflector bezels, mine dont look like that, with a deep inset at the top. But then again my 69 notch started as a basket case missing almost everything. I picked up 2 sets of 69 dart front fender bezels to use. Figured those were correct. A few years back I found a 69 fury in the boneyard, it had one deep bezel, and one not deep bezel on it. Looked like a factory assembly line screw up that nobody noticed since they were original to the car. I sold those since they didnt match. Kinda wondering if either one would have been correct to use. It appears that your bezel angles the reflector more straight. My dart bezels would angle the reflector more down than straight. May have been a thing needed for it to pass DOT regs with the fender curvature? A different bezel.
I will probably use what I have since they are more common, and the deep offset ones seem to be harder to find. That is unless you have a spare set to sell me lolthe deep insert ones are correct for the front so that the reflector is more vertical. Plus the part number is 2930751 front and 2930 757 for the rear. Interesting about the Fury. Just goes to show anything is possible from Chrysler back in the days!!!!
Sorry. No spares!I will probably use what I have since they are more common, and the deep offset ones seem to be harder to find. That is unless you have a spare set to sell me lol