I do too.
I've heard that too, but, I've still never seen proof of a '65 model with a factory installed 8 3/4. Dealer installed, yes, lot's of those due to breaking the 7 1/4. I'm not sure what would be needed as proof however. An original order sheet would probably have that. The build sheet MIGHT indicate one.....so MIGHT the window sticker. 409 code is a special order rear. The axle ratio could be a clue also as some ratio's weren't available in some rear ends. The driveshaft code on the build sheet would probably indicate which rear it came with too as the length would be different. As for it being standard on a '66 4 speed car, no. I've personally seen two original '66 FS cars with a 4 speed and a 7 1/4 SG rear. All my manuals only list a 7 1/4 rear axle housing and axle shaft for a '65 model. My early '66 Barracuda ( 8/17/65 build date) came with what I believe is a factory 8 3/4. It didn't have a window sticker or build sheet when I bought the car in 1980, but, it doesn't look like it was ever changed and the ratio code matches the IBM card from Chrysler Historical.
I have a copy of the NHRA notice allowing the 8.75 in Junior Stock. I can’t remember if it’s dated. If dated that would give one an idea of about when the factory started putting them in 4 speed cars. As far as the cars that got warranty replacements the shop invoice would probably the only proof.
To me, the availability of an 8 3/4 only confirms when they started making them and could be dealer installed, not when they were a factory option. I'd like to see some official paperwork (like and order sheet) where that option was actually included in a factory build.
Depending upon the exact numbers, that fender tag alone could be worth more than the car. I've heard of people buying a rusted-out car w/ desirable fender tag, replacing everything under the fender tag (plus VIN tag if exists), then calling that the same car. Of course, with options to match the tag.
If he is, likely just a viewer. He would need a thick skin to tolerate the abuse he takes from other "experts" here. I like his youtubes and learn a lot, but many people are offended by anyone treading in their playground. Be careful what tech opinions you express here, especially anything about racing or slant-six engines. But, not as bad as fusses on sites about military history or gun tech. Those playgrounds have a tough crowd which is easily offended.
You're probably right. On another mopar forum one member called him an "ignorant,arrogant mopar version of Scotty Kilmer" and claimed he'd knock him out if he ever saw him in person because he got into an argument with him on youtube over something he was wrong about. I've only seen a couple of his videos years ago,so I don't know much about him,but he seems to rub a lot of folks the wrong way. Theres something about internet forums that seems to bring out the best in people. Lol
Hard to imagine a 318 couldn't run <10 sec qtr mile, at least with mods, since a slant-six ran 9.09 sec:
He was, @whitepunkonitro was His Member/user name, not seen in a while. I'm not even sure this will tag Him, probably been too long, & He probably won't see it if it does.
Yep. no need to tag him here.
I know what you mean. I hate people who have the "I may not always be right,but im never wrong" mentality. I avoid car shows for this and other reasons. I once listened to some loudmouth state that he bought a "1957 Golden sport Fury with a factory 383" I told him that Plymouth didn't offer a "Sport Fury" in 1957 and that they didn't offer a 383. But he was adamant that he was right and I was wrong. I just walked away and shook my head and laughed at it. You hear all sorts of crazy misinformation being tossed about as gospel and as you said,the unfortunate thing is that it gets repeated as fact by those who know no better.
