340 or 408?

-
Trust me I definitely understand the general sentiment. But if you're looking at what you would actually feel by the butt dyno, The larger displacement area under the curve difference is huge.

In fact I would go so far as to say that even properly geared stalled etc the bigger engine is going to win by virtue of that increased area under the curve. It's making more power across a broader RPM range you can work with that.
My butt dyno says i have a much larger cubic inch then 355” which is backed up by the 1.29 60’.
 
Funny thing, these quarter mile calculators a lots seem to hold in high regard don't care about cid and torque, it's all about hp and weight. If torque played a significant role outside of hp these calculators would have to factor it in or they would be useless.
 
Funny thing, these quarter mile calculators a lots seem to hold in high regard don't care about cid and torque, it's all about hp and weight. If torque played a significant role outside of hp these calculators would have to factor it in or they would be useless.


What? Are you saying that they don’t use torque to predict ET??

Blasphemy lol
 
Has anyone tested a 340 vs a 340 with nothing more than a 4" stroke. lol
I know which one I would pick to be the winner.
 
Has anyone tested a 340 vs a 340 with nothing more than a 4" stroke. lol
I know which one I would pick to be the winner.
There's a stock (4bbl & headers) magnum 360 vs 410 but they added almost 2 points of compression when they stroked it, it gain 29 hp, 305 hp vs 334 hp but obviously a chunk of it's from more cr.

There's also a more performance build 360 vs 410 using same parts think it was Edelbrock headed, and the 410 made less then 10 hp more.

Look at that 302 vs 327 vs 350 they were pretty much identical builds especially the 302 and 327 and made same hp. Plus the 400 hp magazine 318 & 360 builds all are fairly identical to each other.
 
-
Back
Top