No, I was running 72 340 "J" heads with 1.88 intakes and 1.60 exhaust. The heads were milled .040 to get 65cc chambers. I did check before I did the final assy.You didn't have any clearance issues between the valves and cylinder walls?
No, I was running 72 340 "J" heads with 1.88 intakes and 1.60 exhaust. The heads were milled .040 to get 65cc chambers. I did check before I did the final assy.You didn't have any clearance issues between the valves and cylinder walls?
Definitely would have to be spun to 7000 rpm the 318 is at 6200 rpm, could use Rhoads lifters to be more streetable.I have put a 340 top top end (heads, cam, intake and carb) on a 273 since I had a forged crank, TRW forged 10.5:1 piston shortblock. Pretty much ran like a 340, minus a small bit. The problem with a 273 and really high flowing heads you get past a 7,000 rpm peak. Not really friendly on the street, pretty much driving around in 2nd gear unless you are on the highway.
YesDo you agree you just can't keep on adding infinitely more gear for faster e.t.?
PossiblyIf agreed do you agree the 318 with peak power 800 rpm higher will need deeper gears than the 360 at optimal gearing for both for best e.t. ?
That’s what I was saying.Do agree your basic premise if I put more gear behind the 318 you could do same with the 360?
I agree but do you want me to explain what you know so we’ll to you?If so say for a eg 360 = 4.56 and 318 =5.13 this the optimal gear for each, why adding 5.13 behind the 360 ain't gonna work ?
At least you can half way lolPossibly
I know that’s what you been saying cause ask if that’s been your basic premise not mine.That’s what I was saying.
SureI agree but do you want me to explain what you know so we’ll to you?
LMAO—- Oooooooooooooo Kay!!!!!At least you can half way lol
Incorrect. Yours since you mentioned it first and took that route and now your saying what I never said but what you said so if that confusion for you perhaps you should not mention something so obvious and the. Call me out on your own short comings of understand what you think you said and assumed I said or purposely flipped the direction in an effort to hide your own short comings by twisting words around and trying to trick people into thinking I said something I didn’t but what you said first in order to crutch a smaller engine making less power which we all know will loose to the larger engine no matter how you twist the words of adding more torque through gear ratio to do the obscure and make more torque than the bigger engine when you never gave the option of another gear ratio for the larger engine to compete.I know that’s what you been saying cause ask if that’s been your basic premise not mine.
@273My turn….
Have you built your own engines if so, how many?
Have you worked in a machine shop?
Do you rebuild your own heads?
Have you been asked to build engines for others?
If so how many?
Any schooling?
Any family in drag racing or other racing venues?
How many generations?
Are you or have you been a professional mechanic?
If so, how many years?
No mostly done is added basic performance parts to stock short block mostly 318’sMy turn….
Have you built your own engines if so, how many?
Have you worked in a machine shop?
Do you rebuild your own heads?
Have you been asked to build engines for others?
If so how many?
Any schooling?
Yes my uncle owns and operates a Top Alcohol car and manufactures his own cnc hemi blocks, my cousin ran late model help him, his dad built a lot of engine when we were kids learn a lot through him hanging around.Any family in drag racing or other racing venues?
Work for my dad’s garage on and off.Are you or have you been a professional mechanic?
You literally typed that’s what you been saying how’s that me flipping it. LolLMAO—- Oooooooooooooo Kay!!!!!
Incorrect. Yours since you mentioned it first and took that route and now your saying what I never said but what you said so if that confusion for you perhaps you should not mention something so obvious and the. Call me out on your own short comings of understand what you think you said and assumed I said or purposely flipped the direction in an effort to hide your own short comings by twisting words around and trying to trick people into thinking I said something I didn’t but what you said first in order to crutch a smaller engine making less power which we all know will loose to the larger engine no matter how you twist the words of adding more torque through gear ratio to do the obscure and make more torque than the bigger engine when you never gave the option of another gear ratio for the larger engine to compete.
Totally slanted in the wrong way. Hyper confused you are.
You assumption is mid leading and only fooling those that don’t know and if you truly believe the **** your shoveling that you are dumber than I thought you are which is constantly showing with totally outlandish assumptions and straight up stating things as fact.
You need to take a look at the whole picture and stop one siding the dribble you spew. You are taking this to a joker level of dizzying heights. You must live the lack of oxygen.
OK coolNo mostly done is added basic performance parts to stock short block mostly 318’s
You need to hang around them some more.Yes my uncle owns and operates a Top Alcohol car and manufactures his own cnc hemi blocks, my cousin ran late model help him, his dad built a lot of engine when we were kids learn a lot through him hanging around.
Very coolWork for my dad’s garage on and off.
This last sentence is a ridiculous statement and something that should have never popped out of your mouth.Do I have as much experience as you probably not doesn’t mean I can’t know things.
LMAO!You literally typed that’s what you been saying how’s that me flipping it. Lol
Yes sirLMAO!
Now get your arse to work on that 318! Damit!!!!
Incorrect !You literally typed that’s what you been saying how’s that me flipping it. Lol
Incorrect !
Your putting words in my mouth.
It’s there for everyone to see!
Surely Shirley you can’t be serious?!?!
That's exactly how I feel talking with youYour confusing & confused
I finally get the problem, your under the impression if you gear the 360 more the added torque matters it's doesn't, it's the HorsePower to the ground that matter and gears do nothing for hp, Cause you guys are obsessed with torque especially the difference larger engines have over smaller ones so I was just pointing when two engine of similar power curves but different torque curves with proper gearing basically equals the torque out to the ground.Bullshit because your not allowing the 360 any such benefit
Incorrect, this is what you statedI finally get the problem, your under the impression if you gear the 360 more the added torque matters it's doesn't,
After several posts you admitted to it.it's the HorsePower to the ground that matter and gears do nothing for hp, Cause you guys are obsessed with torque especially the difference larger engines have over smaller ones so I was just pointing when two engine of similar power curves but different torque curves with proper gearing basically equals the torque out to the ground.
Oui!When for eg. you make 400 hp with a bunch of different size engines will divide it into different ratios of torque and rpm and proper gearing will basically have to redivide the torque and rpm to line up the hp curves of the different engines of similar power curves.
Couldn't figure out why you couldn't get passed the 360 gearing, now I see