takes time and people are lazy... but i will say when i figured out how power valves worked it felt amazing.. (before the internet) soo many problems fixed. i like learning ****I'm befuddled why people just don't simply learn how to tune a carburetor.
Yeah and Holley tells you the WRONG WAY to choose them, too which adds to the confusion.takes time and people are lazy... but i will say when i figured out how power valves worked it felt amazing.. (before the internet) soo many problems fixed. i like learning ****
I know mine is. I love the thing.I'm excited to try this street demon... i hope it's as good as people have said.
The Street Demon has what's called "triple stacked" boosters. They "somehow" atomize the fuel better......and I can attest to that, because I very recently swapped on an Edelbrock 750 in place of my 625 Street Demon. The 750 had a little rougher idle......the camshaft came through a little more. That's proof right there the Street Demon is a better mixer......at least at idle. I didn't have a chance to leave the Edelbrock on as one of the floats was compromised and it eventually started flooding, so I swapped the Street Demon back on. On this Ford 400, it "runs out" of primaries pretty quick, so that tells me it needs more carburetor.......well....at least bigger primaries. While it had the 750 on it, it did have WAY better throttle response, so I will likely try the 750 again and see if I can get it to tune out. I think it will be more efficient in the long run, because the Street Demon gets into the secondaries pretty "quick" if that makes sense. Of course, ultimately, I'd love to try a 750 Street Demon, but funds just won't allow.@Icetech beat me to it, but deep down inside, @RustyRatRod, I think you knew the answer all along. Speaking of Steet Demon carbs, What can you tell me about them. I have an Edelbrock on my 340. It runs well, and is fairly easy to tune, but do you guys like the Street Demons better?
I know I have zero complaints with mine!The creator of the Street Demon was an engineer for Carter fuel systems during the muscle car era. Its reported he took the best attributes of the Carter AFB, Thermoquad and Rochester Quadrajet when designing the SD carb.
So, half of the idle vacuum isn't correct?Yeah and Holley tells you the WRONG WAY to choose them, too which adds to the confusion.
I used to do it by half vacuum at idle in gear... which might be wrong... once again... holley tuning is an enigmaSo, half of the idle vacuum isn't correct?
Lazy...I'm befuddled why people just don't simply learn how to tune a carburetor.
This looks quite interesting. Anyone tried it out?
I don't hate the idea of the thing... but it's not for me. that video though is not a good endorsement. His rant about not having a digital gauge was insane and just weird... also you don't have to stare at the thing all the time.. put it somewhere you don't see it and pull it out when needed.. it was just odd all aroundLooking at that guy I dont figure he knows his *** from a hole in ther ground or as they used to say "**** form Shine-ola" another YT *****...LOL!
Cause it's been 30 years and technology changes... it's a viable solution for guys that don't want to fix their stuff.. but the way they are marketing it and the people that are advertising for him would turn me away.. also it looks like complete *** in a engine bay... in a chevy or ford sure.. you can't make them look good anyway, but i would never do that in my own car. Looks matterI have to suspect that is a way of maintaining a 14.7:1 AF ratio and like said somewhere else in this thread they tried that ,right before fuel injection came out as an emission control it didnt work well on a carb then so why do it now...
Maybe so.Lazy...
Not in my opinion, no.So, half of the idle vacuum isn't correct?