My bad … I meant 302… I have a set of 308sThe 308 is a 360 head and open chamber. The 302 head is a "swirl port" closed chamber head
My bad … I meant 302… I have a set of 308sThe 308 is a 360 head and open chamber. The 302 head is a "swirl port" closed chamber head
Have you figured out what the DCO of a jet is yet.MCA. Do you know what that is?
Any thread on 302's goes the same way. They tend to solicit an emotional response in certain people.....And another thread bites the dust…and another one gone …and another one gone ……
If they are not cracked "the 308s" that is, they are LIGHT years better than the 302 heads.My bad … I meant 302… I have a set of 308s
Dont appear to be cracked but I was hoping for closed chamber to take advantage of quench .If they are not cracked "the 308s" that is, they are LIGHT years better than the 302 heads.
If they are not cracked "the 308s" that is, they are LIGHT years better than the 302 heads.
I couldn’t get thru the whole thing, but at about 5-6mins in there is mention of lightweight Manley or Icon pistons.
That sure doesn’t sound like stock replacement parts to me.
Dont appear to be cracked but I was hoping for closed chamber to take advantage of quench .
Yes , but it requires a step piston which I imagine is not cheap.You do know you can get quench with an open chamber head dont you?
And I’ll mention it again. Quench is way less critical as the chamber and plug location gets better. And the rod to stroke ratio isn’t under 1.65:1.
Another poor attempt to denigrate. Let me guess ........... I hurt your feelings again.No they are not. Hysteric says so. The 302 is the greatest head ever cast by Chrysler.
It will make more power than even the W2.
And we all know Hysteric is never wrong.
KB step pistons are not that expensive, but decking the block, milling the chambers of the head to equal depths, rebuilding of factory rods to equal lengths or buying new rods, it all adds up pretty fast.Yes , but it requires a step piston which I imagine is not cheap.
Another poor attempt to denigrate. Let me guess ........... I hurt your feelings again.
Yes , but it requires a step piston which I imagine is not cheap.
Nope.. didnt know . That is what the learning is about .No, it doesn’t require a step piston. You just stick the piston out of the hole.
Do you know that in Stock Eliminator (last time I looked) anyone running a 68-71 340 can put this piston out of the hole as much as .054 and still be legal.
The only limit to sticking the piston out of the bore is top ring placement.
Yeah right. Anyone that questions your perceived self imposed authority gets attacked. How many times have you been banned for being a dick is it now?You don’t matter to me. What matters is exposing lying fools. You’re doing a fine job of exposing yourself.
Yeah right. Anyone that questions your perceived self imposed authority gets attacked. How many times have you been banned for being a dick is it now?
Usually "Intelligent" people can discuss ideas without having to attack others that disagree with them. You cant and to try all sorts of childish **** to diminish the posters credibility because you cannot discredit their argument or point. All that does is expose how little you really know.
Sorry but no one made you the gate keeper on all things mopar............thank god for that.
Maybe you should go and save all those poor souls that have underheaded their engines starting with this guy:
View attachment 1716024523
Usually "Intelligent" people can discuss ideas without having to attack others that disagree with them.
Nope.. didnt know . That is what the learning is about .
So your saying that other people are responsible for your bad behavior now and in the past......Im sure I’ll get kicked off of here again because of lying liars like you.
NOPE you chose to interpret it that way. That has been posted many times on this forum when the argument of heads being to small on any 302 head thread so people already know they are 360 heads.You worded so it appeared that car was running 318 heads. But it’s not.
Where have you been......interesting.
context?Where have you been......
context?
you evidently missed the entire intent of my reply. that's okay though.
The only thing i find interesting is how people can make a lot of power with what some would consider too small a head. Maybe the significance of that statement is missed by some here.....
I doubt it. Your point was obviously the kettle calling the pot black was it not?you evidently missed the entire intent of my reply. that's okay though.
So your saying that other people are responsible for your bad behavior now and in the past......
NOPE you chose to interpret it that way. That has been posted many times on this forum when the argument of heads being to small on any 302 head thread so people already know they are 360 heads.