Or another way of saying it why if the smaller engine does make less what stopped from turning more rpms to make up the difference since it has a top end to support that much hp ?
[/QUOE]
As previously explained;
The size of the engine, if being pushed to maximum power levels as it’s limits in the parts everywhere.
Backing it down to a street machine engine, the basic bore and stroke are limiters of power. Skip the cam and top end for now.
Bore is HP limited or producing, stroke is torque limited or producing. For the most part, this is the basic way it works. One will feed the other partially. A bigger bore engine will produce more torque and a bigger stroke engine will produce more HP.
The stroke length is a helping but not in concrete measuring item that will have a operating rpm band where it works the best. As you often label the stroke of YYY good in a certain rpm range of AAA & a crank throw of ZZZ good in between BBB, which is only true in a extremely narrow and defined area under very certain circumstances only. The rest of the engine has yet to come into play.
If you add displacement or build bigger displacement you add torque you can't say the same with hp,
Yes you can as previously explained and shown.
YOU! Just said it yourself earlier!
torque is a (guesstimation) 80% cid 20% top end and hp is probably opposite ratio.
I don’t know how you come up with this.
Funny how we both think this shows each of us are right. Now most everyone says adding a decent amount of displacement will add torque which we all know it does 100% of the time but also says a decent amount of hp will also be gained, with a gain of 50 cid a 14% cid gain should add a good amount of hp to peak and power curve if people are right.
