Interesting. Are the ones your using the CNC port version?
They were thin as cast.
Interesting. Are the ones your using the CNC port version?
Wow! That's a bit of jump in HP.
What was the size of the first carb?
Is the 1050RS a Dom. Flange?
Cam description/specs?
Got the 426 bolted together.
http://s1081.photobucket.com/user/heyoldguy/media/Donny%20B%20426%20016.jpg.html?o=0
sure, the block is as small as a 273's. Displacement is through the roof though...whats life of one of these with that radical rod angle?
Okay I guess. But what about an AMC Pacer?Put it in a Gremlin. Then give it back to him.
I think our LAX heads will out flow the ProComps. I plan on doing back-to-back flow tests on the same day.What valves size valves did you use in the pro comps ?
Do you think the lax will outflow the pro comps ?
Hey now! Dontchoo be Makin fun of my Gremlin-driving-days! I GREMLINIZED plenty of 5.0 fox bodies!Put it in a Gremlin. Then give it back to him.
yes, it still has small block heads...Got the 426 bolted together.
http://s1081.photobucket.com/user/heyoldguy/media/Donny B 426 016.jpg.html?o=0
I don't think there is anything such as max ported. I think you can always get more out of a cylinder head if you can just figure it out. I believe that there is more flow in both the LAX and the ProComp heads. I still believe that the Edelbrock is a better quality head. Flow wise, I couldn't honestly say.Nice work Jim !!
So are are both sets max ported ?
Looks like the exhaust side flows a bit more on the pro comps .
Do you think you can get more out of the pro comps ?
Do edelbrocks and pro comps flow about the same ?
Or is one better ?
As always thanks for taking the time to compare and share results !!
Jim
So, balancing the cc's in the combustion chambers today and getting ready to assemble the engine and put it on the dyno. No pictures or technical data, as this is hopefully just a failure. I'd like to prevent dealing with the crap RAMM and others have to wade through presently.