I'd settle for an original Hickey Enterprises pushbar for my K5.View attachment 1716045796
my teenage dream, Colt Seavers truck! and Jodie of course.....
The AMC Cherokee and Wagoner are great looking, but lets call them SUV's.
Anyone ?
I'd settle for an original Hickey Enterprises pushbar for my K5.View attachment 1716045796
my teenage dream, Colt Seavers truck! and Jodie of course.....
The AMC Cherokee and Wagoner are great looking, but lets call them SUV's.
This is quite similar to the explanation I got from a good friend who was a GM Sales Manager for many years:I get tired explaining to guys that the GMCs come down the line they split from the line and go up to the next level where the atmosphere totally changes, with classical music played, the employees are standing on red carpet. Champaign dispensers are located through out, and crates of lockwashers everywhere.
I bought new my 2000 GMC 3500 duelie for a rig truck still in service. The plastic caps on the rear melted cause of mud packed between the rims. A guy gave me 4 simulators with chevy caps, I put the chevy caps on the back, still have the gmc caps on the front. When guys rib me about it, I just tell them that when GMCs get over 10 years old they start turning into Chevrolets, most scoff at that, some laughThis is quite similar to the explanation I got from a good friend who was a GM Sales Manager for many years:
"They all start down the line as 'GMC' but if something fucks up along the way, they just stick a bowtie on them"
RIP Gerry
Another good engine. I had a 87 Pontiac Gran Am with one.the 151 "The Iron Duke"
What a turd that was. They took the already weak Pontiac block and lightened it, reducing the durability even more.Pontiac had a 301
I have seen a few, though can't say if they were original or transplants. It was pretty common to shitcan the 301 and drop a sbc in its placeWhat a turd that was. They took the already weak Pontiac block and lightened it, reducing the durability even more.
The Turbo 301 was even worse. 210 HP from a turbo V8 is pathetic but they were up against the wall trying to make power without blowing it up and incurring a red wave of warranty service costs.
There may have been some 305 chevy engines in the 1980 and 81 Firebirds but I'm not sure.
Your truck, or the 454SS? The SS wasn't as fast as the Little Red Express, and I smoked one at Keystone Raceway in '92 with My '88 ShelbyZ, and that was not on the best tires.If it wasn't for the ex forcing sale I'd still have Black/Grey GMC 1 Ton 4x4, 454, 4.11's. 11 MPG uphill or down. Era of the 454SS. That truck rocked !
MyYour truck, or the 454SS? The SS wasn't as fast as the Little Red Express, and I smoked one at Keystone Raceway in '92 with My '88 ShelbyZ, and that was not on the best tires.
The 454 SS of the early 90s was a turd. The same year Ford Lightning has a 351 and it was faster. The Chevy had a torquey truck engine that had a torque peak around 1600-1700 rpms and a HP peak well under 4000 rpms. Great for towing, bad for acceleration.Your truck, or the 454SS? The SS wasn't as fast as the Little Red Express, and I smoked one at Keystone Raceway in '92 with My '88 ShelbyZ, and that was not on the best tires.
I don't know, Pop ordered His new '76 with an 8ft. Stepside box, to be replaced with the just-discontinued stake-bed, no radio, no A/C, 350-4bbl, 4spd., 3/4ton 4×4. Hardly some luxo-level tonka-toy, lol..I was always under the impression that a GMC truck was just a dressed-up Chevy truck. So my question is that if that is true, what is the allure? They cost quite a bit more to start with. I am not trying to be snarky; I am really curious.
Im working on a 69 GMC and it has coils. Definetly stock. I will say, they ride better than leaf spring trucks.During the 67 to 72 year span, the Chevrolet trucks had coil rear suspension and GMC had leaf spring rear suspension.