Heads are already decided upon? But thanks for taking your time to look those up.Heads options google search less than a minute.
Heads are already decided upon? But thanks for taking your time to look those up.Heads options google search less than a minute.
If you know anything about me , of course I like this. 1wild guess would be the exh manifolds will hold back at around 475hp if the heads are about perfect .As the title suggests, I'm going to build another stroker engine. I've already had a 500hp 408 in my Dart, but now I want to build something different for my Duster. I'll use this thread to discuss ideas and thoughts that people might have about the build. The car is a 340 "tribute" car so I'm not worried about it looking 100% stock, and I'm not doing any FAST racing, but that is the theme I'm going for. I want the engine to appear to be stock or close to stock looking to the naked eye. I'll probably paint an Edelbrock intake but NO aluminum heads or headers. The goal will be to build a 12 second street car that appears to be basically stock. I'll be running a stock 4 speed and 3.55 gears.
I have a standard 1970 340 block and a set of J heads that are untouched. I will be running the Hughes/Scat forged rotating assembly. And am going to run a mechanical roller camshaft. I realize that iron heads and manifolds will set some limitations, but I'm not opposed to working with them as best as possible to achieve the end goals. I'm starting with bare cores, so everything will have to be replaced any way. Camshaft will be custom ground to work with the heads and exhaust.
Let's have some fun with this and you guys can spend my money as you see fit. Anybody who wants to make negative comments about it, save it for your build thread. I get it. It's not going to be everyone's cup of tea. But it's mine and that's what I want to do. And GO!
View attachment 1716112358
92-3 ?? Dakota RT 360 MagnumIf you want quench could get pistons with a quench pad. Any 360/340/5.9 manifolds should be fine there ain't a huge power difference between them, but the best combo is suppose to be one 340 and one magnum forget which ones. A little head work and the cam should get you there no problem.
92-3 ?? Dakota RT 360 Magnum
2 1/2 outlets very similar in flow to 68-71 340 manifolds
Like I said before, I’m just throwing out ideas. If I’m paying for a stroker kit anyway, why not pay for another 19 cubic inches?Ok I'm just gonna point out this seems like someone's tugg of war with direction.
"Bigger is better right"
Just stroke a BB to 540 or so and top it off with a nice set of 516 heads.
I remember a few threads where BrianT was being a real true colors kinda guy.
Enjoy the build n best of luck.
I don't remember the exact ones, there was a mopar mag did a manifold shootout, I know the best combo was a mix of one 340 and one 5.9. second place was two magnums and third was 340 then 360 then 318 but there was only a like 5-7 hp from best to worst.92-3 ?? Dakota RT 360 Magnum
2 1/2 outlets very similar in flow to 68-71 340 manifolds
I see displacement more as a powerband selecter, your gonna use a powerband range of rpms about 2500 to 3000 rpms from stall to shift points in a drag race. The 434 powerband probaby will operate about 300 rpm less then 408 which is about 400-600 less than a 360. Which depends on what's done to the heads you might make peak hp mid/high 4000 rpms so Eg.. a 2500-5000 to 2800 - 5300 rpm stall to shift.Like I said before, I’m just throwing out ideas. If I’m paying for a stroker kit anyway, why not pay for another 19 cubic inches?
I’ma small block guy and I’m gonna stay that way. I’m not sure what you mean by “true colors kinda guy” but I have been a Mopar guy for almost fifty years now.
What are everyone's thoughts on this 435 kit from Hughes. I mean, if you're gonna go big, why not go bigger? Anyone have any experience with a kit this size? Would this be a race only kind of thing or would it be streetable?
https://hughesengines.com/Index/pro...ciBLaXRz&level2=MzQwIHRvIDQzNQ==&partid=31992
Porting of the intake manifold, exhaust manifolds and heads to their maximum abilities is the only route. OEM heads can go pretty far. I’ve seen 275 from the letter heads. This will be reduced significantly with the iron manifolds. Once you have the intake and heads ported, have them flow tested together to see not only how well they flow together, it’s how much and where the best air flow happens. Only from there can you even consider a camshaft.As the title suggests, I'm going to build another stroker engine. I've already had a 500hp 408 in my Dart, but now I want to build something different for my Duster. I'll use this thread to discuss ideas and thoughts that people might have about the build. The car is a 340 "tribute" car so I'm not worried about it looking 100% stock, and I'm not doing any FAST racing, but that is the theme I'm going for. I want the engine to appear to be stock or close to stock looking to the naked eye. I'll probably paint an Edelbrock intake but NO aluminum heads or headers. The goal will be to build a 12 second street car that appears to be basically stock. I'll be running a stock 4 speed and 3.55 gears.
I have a standard 1970 340 block and a set of J heads that are untouched. I will be running the Hughes/Scat forged rotating assembly. And am going to run a mechanical roller camshaft. I realize that iron heads and manifolds will set some limitations, but I'm not opposed to working with them as best as possible to achieve the end goals. I'm starting with bare cores, so everything will have to be replaced any way. Camshaft will be custom ground to work with the heads and exhaust.
Let's have some fun with this and you guys can spend my money as you see fit. Anybody who wants to make negative comments about it, save it for your build thread. I get it. It's not going to be everyone's cup of tea. But it's mine and that's what I want to do. And GO!
View attachment 1716112358
Don’t view the size of the CID as a rpm selector. Doing so seriously inhibits any build. The ability of an engine to RPM is not due to stroke size but it is a function of valve train stability and cam lobe profile in conjunction with the ease of air in and out of the engine.I see displacement more as a powerband selecter, your gonna use a powerband of around 2500-3000 rpm from stall to shift points in a drag race. The 434 powerband probaby will operate about 300 rpm less then 408 which is about 400-600 less than a 360. Which depends on what's done to the heads you might make peak hp mid/high 4000 rpms so Eg.. a 2500-5000 to 2800 - 5300 rpm stall to shift.
Good thing it's gonna be strongest at all street rpms and probably only need highway gears, bad thing power is gonna drop off rapidly after peak hp.
3.55 28" tires @ 110 mphs = 4686 rpms
Heads options google search less than a minute.
Those Indy MA-X heads seem pretty good if those flow numbers are accurate. Curious what light bowl work would do.
He seems pretty stuck on his head choice. Which is fine as it’s his build.
Did I say it's cause of stroke length, not it's ability to breath with similar top ends.Don’t view the size of the CID as a rpm selector. Doing so seriously inhibits any build. The ability of an engine to RPM is not due to stroke size but it is a function of valve train stability and cam lobe profile in conjunction with the ease of air in and out of the engine.
Any arguments to the contrary are stupid and ridiculous.
It’s already been proven many many times over, over a few decades already.