Mild 360 Magnum Build

-
Do you know if they have any results with the standard 171 version of the ProMaxx? It's not far behind the Shocker for peak flow, about 30 cfm. I've got a set and I'm trying to decide if I send them out for the Shocker treatment or just use as-is.
Gzig, 30 cfm from a set of these types of heads isn’t what I’d call “Not far behind.” Also a lot will be combination dependent as well as the engines CID. In the laymen’s EZ math, it could be a 60hp difference. Nevermind when your going to push it a little hard.
 
I'm looking at doing a 416 with Shockers and likely a dual plane intake...I will start a build thread
 
Everyone keep an eye out for my 416 inch engine build thread titled…. Big bottom end gets the shocker!
 
Gzig, 30 cfm from a set of these types of heads isn’t what I’d call “Not far behind.” Also a lot will be combination dependent as well as the engines CID. In the laymen’s EZ math, it could be a 60hp difference. Nevermind when your going to push it a little hard.
Well, compared to my stock 2.02 J-heads they aren't far behind. My build is going to to be street and road course oriented so I think I'll have to go about it differently from someone that is focused on quarter mile games and that 30 cfm may not manifest itself as much. The biggest flowing head my not be in my best interest, though it should ultimately make more peak power. I still need to decide if I stay with the stock crank or go with a 4" arm.
 
Well, compared to my stock 2.02 J-heads they aren't far behind. My build is going to to be street and road course oriented so I think I'll have to go about it differently from someone that is focused on quarter mile games and that 30 cfm may not manifest itself as much. The biggest flowing head my not be in my best interest, though it should ultimately make more peak power. I still need to decide if I stay with the stock crank or go with a 4" arm.
Until the port takes over (upper rpm range) it’ll be close to the same down low. (From the start of the power point in the curve until somewhere around the 5252 rpm mark. Depends on the combo.

Now road course racing is a monkey I never played with but I do get your concern. You’ll have to know the course lay out and how long the straights are. If your running multiple road courses, this can be a weird trick to figure out.

Can you link the road courses?
 
About 4400 feet but the first 1300 is uphill. The track is 4 miles long. A friend that runs there regularly said a decent car can hit 140 on the straights just depends on how big your balls and brakes are. He runs spec Miatas and hit’s 110-120 with an essentially stock motor, but lighter car.
 
That’s more than 3/4’s of a mile. Closer to 7/8 maybe?
It’s 660 short of a mile. That’s a lot of zoom room.
It sure looks like fun though.
 
About 4400 feet but the first 1300 is uphill. The track is 4 miles long. A friend that runs there regularly said a decent car can hit 140 on the straights just depends on how big your balls and brakes are. He runs spec Miatas and hit’s 110-120 with an essentially stock motor, but lighter car.
I do the same out here in the west, in a Miata. Completely stock drivetrain, good brakes, coil overs, and good tires. At COTA on the back straight it seems like you could eat lunch after shifting to 5th before you see a brake marker. We ran up to about 127mph there. In the Porsche coming into the braking zone we saw 151.
3D01FA4B-9179-4131-8CEF-0F6E87C975FB.png
91294702-B6F9-4E78-8BCA-0E895F91E3EE.jpeg
 
Thanks, always interesting. It really tanks @ 7000rpm or maybe the throttle was slammed closed at the end of the test. J.R.
Here is the cam card….because I know you like that sort of info….

B4DA51FA-C625-4971-94F9-9A0FDD7BF2FE.jpeg
 
It had a Holley strip dominator intake on it…they figured to get to 600 it would need to be ported
 
-
Back
Top