New life for an old 340 (stock stroke)

-
Yep. From your numbers your block was .046 OVER the max deck height of the block.

I was told that Chrysler would only take enough off the casting to get a clean, flat surface. That's why some ran like dogs, and some ran like a striped *** ape. When you have a tall deck, a set of rods at the blue print minimum and maybe a set of Pistons that were short on CH and you'd get one with 9.25:1 instead of 10.5:1 with all the tolerance stack up.
 
Yep last J heads I cut to 59 ccs was .050" removed. Those had flat faced valves. Notice the calc says 10.75, I will cut .045"-.050" and if it winds up @ 10.3 so be it. J.Rob
There’s always a thicker head gasket....
:rofl:
 
A little more head way. See what I did there? J.Rob

IMG_20180629_152234431.jpg


IMG_20180629_133939767.jpg


IMG_20180629_152218842.jpg
 
Why does that exhaust valve look small as chit?
 
I'm actually quite satisfied with the flow results. Does anybody care to venture a guess as to why? J.Rob
 
Milled the heads .040" decks and intake face. Checked volume 60ccs and rechecked flow after final S.S. touch ups. Flow is now a smooth sounding 250-251cfm @ .490" Beyond that flow drops into the 240's and plateaus. I think these will work nicely considering the cam and compression. Looks like 10.7 static is in the cards. J.Rob

34060ccchamber.jpg


340xflowbenchaftermilling.jpg


340xflowbenchaftermilling.jpg


34060ccchamber.jpg
 
250 cfm? That’s enough to make a nice street engine for sure.
 
Any updates? I love the stock stroke builds and interested on seeing what that 113 LSA cam does.
 
-
Back
Top