ir3333
Well-Known Member
Nice engine for sure. But shouldn't a 10.50 compression big block with ported heads, 2" intake valves, performer RPM intake, 750 double pumper and .525 lift cam make 400 hp.... or more?
This 383 made 414 @5800. THe dyno pull is at 30 min.Nice engine for sure. But shouldn't a 10.50 compression big block with ported heads, 2" intake valves, performer RPM intake, 750 double pumper and .525 lift cam make 400 hp.... or more?
Yeah, but what you have is different! That's why I turned into a slant 6 guy!
What? Our little 318's aren't good enough?
Man, talk about the red headed stepchild. Even the /6 guys mock us!
That's basically the 400 hp recipe for a sbm, the 3 400hp 318 builds out there are similar spec's and a few 400 hp 360's.Nice engine for sure. But shouldn't a 10.50 compression big block with ported heads, 2" intake valves, performer RPM intake, 750 double pumper and .525 lift cam make 400 hp.... or more?
This doesn't surprise me at all.
I recently put my car on the chassis dyno to optimize it and see the difference between the 600 v/s Holley and the 700cfm Double Pumper I also have.
It's a 354 poly, 727 and made 341hp at the wheels with the 700 cfm and 334hp at the wheels with the 600. It was a filthy hot day, 90° by 11am and nearly 100° by lunchtime.
The dyno guy was very impressed - said it was a really stout engine, the factory 4 barrel manifold is holding it back in his opinion.
For reference the stock 428 Cobra Jet Mustang he ran on there earlier that morning made 290hp. That was an auto too.
I was surprised the power started tailing off by 4,500rpm, it's only a small-ish cam coupled with the factory intake. I do rev it 5,500 rpm though and it still pulls.
It's a 318 poly with a 3.58" Scat forged crank, Scat rods, Ross pistons 0.065 over, 10.8:1 compression. Poly heads with a little bit of porting, 1.94"/1.60" valves, Schneider solid lifter cam 264F (220° at .050, 0.450 lift). Topped off with a factory cast iron intake and an 1850 Holley 600. It's got headers, stepped from 1 5/8 to 1 3/4, 2.5" dual system.
Fancy that, an old poly small block making 50 hp more than a 428 Cobra Jet. Okay, it's not quite a fair comparison as mine is modified and the Cobra Jet was stock but still...
View attachment 1716157651
View attachment 1716157652
View attachment 1716157653
View attachment 1716157654
View attachment 1716157655
No different than the LA components.Them early polys had heavy duty innards didnt they? How are they for revs can youi get 6 thousand sustained out of them?
Yup, the blocks are purt near the same. It can be argued though that the Poly heads are better than the LA heads. At least that's always been my opinion. Chrysler ended production on the Poly for the same reason as the Hemi. Cost. They were good power makers.No different than the LA components.
They were a great head design. Too bad they were so big. They wouldn't fit easily under the hood of the newly designed (smaller) 63 A Bodies.Yup, the blocks are purt near the same. It can be argued though that the Poly heads are better than the LA heads. At least that's always been my opinion. Chrysler ended production on the Poly for the same reason as the Hemi. Cost. They were good power makers.
A 350 horse 318 would be more impressive and pretty easy to do.I’m not sure why everyone is so impressed by this. I mean it’s a 390 cu/in small block that makes 1.03hp/C.I.
and 1.13 lb/ft /C.I. it’s not earth shattering by any standards. In fact it’s less then. And the fact that he keeps calling it a 318 when clearly it’s not is him just trying to make it sound more impressive. Which if it were a 318, it would be.
I agree. When you have to mod it that much to make the power it is no longer a "inexpensive little reliable 318 that makes gobs of power..." this reminds me of a fella 25 or 30 years back who used to run B and RB engines. Hed buy a car and yank the 318, sometimes 360 out and drop a 383 or 400 or 440 in. He'd call me and say "want this 318? come get it..." anyway we were talking once and I said "why dont you eve run the small block...?" he said "its not enough power..." I imagine all this 318 making power talk would amuse him now...I’m not sure why everyone is so impressed by this. I mean it’s a 390 cu/in small block that makes 1.03hp/C.I.
and 1.13 lb/ft /C.I. it’s not earth shattering by any standards. In fact it’s less then. And the fact that he keeps calling it a 318 when clearly it’s not is him just trying to make it sound more impressive. Which if it were a 318, it would be.
It makes fairly identical hp/tq @ similar rpms as the Mopar 380hp magnum create engine, it's got the basic sbm 400hp package on it. It would of been nice if he also ran it with headers to see how much the manifolds were holding it back. But overall it's just an ok build.I’m not sure why everyone is so impressed by this. I mean it’s a 390 cu/in small block that makes 1.03hp/C.I.
and 1.13 lb/ft /C.I. it’s not earth shattering by any standards. In fact it’s less then. And the fact that he keeps calling it a 318 when clearly it’s not is him just trying to make it sound more impressive. Which if it were a 318, it would be.
Two words: exhaust manifolds. And we don't know much about the heads other than they're "ported".Nice engine for sure. But shouldn't a 10.50 compression big block with ported heads, 2" intake valves, performer RPM intake, 750 double pumper and .525 lift cam make 400 hp.... or more?
My mother had '67 Polara 4 dr poly 318 when I was 16. If I put foot on brake and floored it one wheel tire smoke cloud without car moving. And it rev'ed pretty good too. I beat that car real hard when mommy wasn't looking and it never broke.I have heard them Polys are torquey maybe not high revvers but they can get a mid 60s B or C body rolling and cruising.
really ? I was there it was runningNot bad at all for a motor that wasn’t even running while he was tuning and there were motor sounds.