opinions wanted; car sales gone bad

-

66plyValiant

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
2,708
Reaction score
138
Location
windsor NS
earlier this fall I sold a 2000 neon LE to a fella in the local town; didn't know him he saw my ad on a local adverting website similar to craigslist. seen him in a parts store the other day and asked him how the car was working for him; to which he answered "good"

heres a little history on the car

when I bought the car I bought it from a guy in a city for $800 with a few issues such as the speedometer wasn't working; needed brakes redone and some work for MVI as well as some body work

time rolls by and I put nearly $800 into it in new parts and get it re inspected before selling it I needed the money so it was time to sell

recently he sent me this email:



didn't have time to get into it with you at (parts store) the other day but, the car is a hunk of ****, it uses 3L of oil in two weeks! so the motor is gone,also exhaust leak, all 4 struts a blowen, not shot but blowen and every tire was shot, also when I went to the dmv they said the car was registered with 240,000km before I got it. and now it is 140,000km, so I was contacted by the DMV also the mounties regarding the KM being switched, so I forwared your information on to them, they tell me it is fraud to change the dash, Also I told them about the inspection being done a week or two before I got the car and showed them the problems with the car and every single thing that is wrong with it would make it impossible for the car to pass inspection. Not allowed pushing a car through inspection with a hole in the exhaust, bald tires, completley shot struts. So they told me it was fraud by the person who has done the inspection, they took a copy of my inspection also have given me a month to get a new inspection because the one you put on it was not valid and was fraud. They are going to the shop that did the inspection to ask the questions that need to be asked. and now I am out a car because it is a waste of time to do the work to bring it up to code because it burns 3L of oil in two weeks! oh and 20mpg not 48mpg bud.
I know the car was as is where is but it was fraud from day one


---------------------------------------------------------------------


I can't believe the accusations and such he accused me of on a 1200 "as is" car so I sent him this reply:


When I sold you the neon you asked if it used any oil to which my reply was “yes it uses a liter every oil change; for me that was 5000 Km or 3,000 miles. When the shop inspected the car in early September it had 4 brand new Nordic winter tires on it which I removed a week prior to selling it and you were told it would need 4 tires.

I had it to Harvey’s Irving in Brooklyn twice were Raymond Croft checked it for MVI; once for a pre MVI to which he told me what it would need and the second time for the MVI. I replaced everything that it needed for MVI and I told you that list at time of purchase which included brakes front and rear; new muffler, control arm bushings and much more

As for the exhaust leak it was fine when was inspected but the flex pipe went shortly since it was original and it was replaced, it was welded in and there was a spot in the front pipe which the shop had a hard time welding to since it was 12 year old pipe they told me and I mentioned the leak to you as well when I sold it to you.

the speedometer when I bought the car it was not working; I was told it had “less than 100,000 Km on it”; to which I believed; to get the speedometer working I had to change the body control module which also drives the speedometer and all the gauges. When I got the speedometer working it read a little over 130,000 Km to which I believed was to be the original mileage the permit read “unknown mileage” so I assumed it to be correct. A correctly working speedometer is also needed for legal MVI it what Raymond at Harvey’s Irving told me and would’t pass without it working, there’s nothing illegal about changing a body control module to fix a mechanic issue with a part needed for inspection as you said it is illegal to “roll back a speedometer” but this isn’t the case nor would I even try I just wanted my car inspected so I could drive it

The reason the car was as is where is because it is 12 years old and it did require work as you were told; the tires were one thing; and the exhaust was the other; as for the engine burning oil and not getting 35-38 MPG;( not 48 to which you though I had said) could be because the car spent the first 130,000 In the city doing less then 50 and it may have been carboned up. It also required an oil change and tune up (plugs and wires) 1000 KM after you bought it as it was nearly due when I sold it; and I mentioned that as well

I’m very sorry that you have had troubles with the car and I sincerely apologize for any problems you have had
 
as is means as is......period. theres not a damn thing legally he can do about it. it was his responsibility to have it checked out first if he so desired. judge mathis would toss him out of the court room
 
as long as your sellers report says "as-is" your golden. in my opinion it is up to the buyer to look over the car. the seller is motivated to sell and is not going to trash talk the car he is trying to sell. sounds like you told the guys what it needed and he didnt do it and now he wants to pass it off on you. i would tell him that he is welcome to give you the car back but you will need 29.99 for every day he had it as a rental fee. what the hell do you expect for $1200?
 
looks like the guy wanted to get a new car, for $1200.
Hope you wrote sold as-is on the receipt
 
As is where is sort of says it all in my opinion. Guy sounds like he might be one of those folks that expects a Town Car when he buys a Pinto. As to his claims of fraud with MVI, if you got the receipt/paper work etc. that I can only imagine went along with it I would tell him to go screw the nearest tree....
 
another one of those "i want everything for nothing" sort of person. Its never their fault that they didnt look over the car, its automatically your fault for all the problems. dont sweat the petty, pet the sweaty. That guy can go pound sand in my opinion.
 
Hopefully ya'll did a bill of sale with all the discrepancys listed and stateing [as is where is] several times with both yours and the buyers signature on it and the vin number. As far as the speedo i'm unsure how they [dmv/courts] would look at that [do you have a recept for the new body control module] that should explain the speedo issue.As far as the sale you [did what most honest folks] would do and the buyer is now having regrets in his purchase. I have been lucky in my dealings to never had this happen [but i cover my butt three ways to sunday] but the worst thing that can happen is he takes you to small claims court [if you have that in Canada] and if you have proof you told him and wrote it on the bill of sale you should be ok, but if not be prepaired to get the auto back and give him back his money plus what he has spent and court costs. So if you don't think you can win in court then you need to make this guy go away! Some times Craigs List brings out the crazys.
 
I'd tell him..."sorry, as-is means just what it says, and being thats it's winter now and you bought it in the fall, anything could've happened to it between then and now!!" Call Judge Mathis, he'll be glad to help!! Geof
 
Twelve years old and "as is." Nothing more needs to be said.

Sounds to me like you did all you could to reveal known issues. You cannot foresee some hidden, developing problem
 
How does a buyer miss bald tires and BLOWN struts...did he test drive it? Sounds like he didnt quite know what he was buying, and I wouldnt trust a seller about the car history anyway.." Yeah, its got a salvage title, It was wrapped around a telephone pole and I welded another front clip on with my 110V mig and got the rest of the drivetrain from a flooded wreck...." They wont tell you this.....Buyer beware.
 
The laws here are as is the buyer can have the car inspected before purchase by a qualified shop at his expense. If he procedes to purchase it then he is accepting it as-is no turning back.
 
How does a buyer miss bald tires and BLOWN struts...did he test drive it? Sounds like he didnt quite know what he was buying, and I wouldnt trust a seller about the car history anyway.." Yeah, its got a salvage title, It was wrapped around a telephone pole and I welded another front clip on with my 110V mig and got the rest of the drivetrain from a flooded wreck...." They wont tell you this.....Buyer beware.

the tires weren't bald but they were ones I had stuck on it just to sell as I removed my new $500 set of snow tires and kept them. the struts were fine and I put over 10,000 KM or 6000 miles on them before selling the car
 
As is where is sort of says it all in my opinion. Guy sounds like he might be one of those folks that expects a Town Car when he buys a Pinto. As to his claims of fraud with MVI, if you got the receipt/paper work etc. that I can only imagine went along with it I would tell him to go screw the nearest tree....

yes sadly the MVI paperwork needs to go with the car to prove its not a stolen sticker; if he really wanted to look into it; the garage that inspected it is only a 15 minute drive away, the old fella doing the inspections lets nothing slip and is honest as the pope and I had to do my fair share of work to get a safe and legal inspection done
 
15 years in car business

be carefull....the first time you do ANYTHING....even as a goodwill gesture ,you have changed your as-is warranty. F**ken lawyers have made it impossible to help, even if you want to , without "owning" the car for life.

we had a saying to descibe the as-is warranty......if it breaks in to, you own both halves, that's all
 
15 years in car business

be carefull....the first time you do ANYTHING....even as a goodwill gesture ,you have changed your as-is warranty. F**ken lawyers have made it impossible to help, even if you want to , without "owning" the car for life.

we had a saying to descibe the as-is warranty......if it breaks in to, you own both halves, that's all


I don't plan on doing anything except letting it play out; when I buy a $1200 car and it ends up to be junk I consider it my fault; in this case the car worked perfect so I think its a case of new buyer driving the crap out of it

I think all the stuff about him going to DMV and police is bull as they would have contacted me by now since it was september/ first of october when it sold

I sold it because I wanted a newer car which I bought... a 2005 sx 2.0 (neon)
 
yes sadly the MVI paperwork needs to go with the car to prove its not a stolen sticker; if he really wanted to look into it; the garage that inspected it is only a 15 minute drive away, the old fella doing the inspections lets nothing slip and is honest as the pope and I had to do my fair share of work to get a safe and legal inspection done
Any chance of the "old fella" that did the inspection having a copy of the paper work?
 
Sounds to me like just another one of the azzholes of the world that want something for nothing !!! His problem,not yours !!JMHO So sit down and have a cold one !!!:thumbup:
 
Any chance of the "old fella" that did the inspection having a copy of the paper work?

he would have a copy if not DMV would have as per NS inspection laws the customer gets the white copy the shop gets the yellow till the MVI book is full then it goes to the DMV
 
Does the guys have eyes? Couldn't he see the tires were in the condition they were? The buyer needed to get the car checked over by someone who knows cars. If not, and he bought the car? Oh well.
66plyvaliant, I think you have no obligation and I wouldn't even respond to any more emails from him.
 
AS IS means if it breaks in half crossing the sidewalk, you own both halves.
The buyer will have to live with and learn from his mistake. When buying a old used car you should first look at what still moves in the streets. Tick hash marks on a scrap of paper or something. Accords, Camrys, etc.. will out number Noen, Escort, and others 5 to 1. There's your sign.
It's not all about domestic versus import either. They all break.
The cars that cost the buyer more when new often get better maintainance.
Things get fixed when they break so the list of faults doesn't out weigh the car.
Kids who can barely make the payments on their car cant maintain it.
 
You cannot foresee some hidden, developing problem

But, but, but, but.... you mean a car needs no maintenance? You mean you just can't put the key in and drive it and never have to actually do things like check tire pressure, etc?

You mean the current owner actually has to take responsibility for owning the car?

I get this all the time. Car comes in, I look the car over, advise the customer of needed repairs, warn the customer of something which may need to be looked at in the future, do the needed repairs, and three weeks later something else pops up that has nothing to do with the repairs I did and it's suddenly my fault. Like I'm Harry Potter and waved my magic wand over the car and took care of everything that might go bad with the car ever.

Sounds like the buyer of this car is the same way. It's been three months since the buyer bought the car. Tell him to go kick rocks. A lot can happen in three months. It needs new tires? Big hairy deal. How's that your fault three months after the sale, especially in light of the fact you told him it had worn suspension components?

In three months the worn struts were supposed to fix themselves without him having to actually purchase new ones?

In three months the oil consumption was supposed to get better, not worse, without actually taking a look to see what was causing the oil loss?

I see in the email he sent you he's doing a lot of complaining with no explanation as to addressing the current problems. If he was serious about trying to hit you with something he'd have said: "total cost for repairs: $XXXX. I'll see you in court." No, he's hoping to guilt trip you into fixing the car, after a $1200 three month old sale and hoping that by mentioning the proper authorities he'll scare you into doing it.

Ask him what part of "as-is" doesn't he understand. Then ask him what part of "owner responsibility" doesn't he get.
 
-
Back
Top