dirty white boy
50 yr old Juvenal delinquent
any body know how much zppd dose a hydrolic roller lifter cam needs on a ppm scale?
Well, I'll get right on to making room, see in yo there. I always forget about that box, so sorry.Looking at the roller lifter from Hughes the needles can't come out of the lifter assembly if for some reason they fail. The roller and needles are up inside the body. I'm guessing there would be a very bad noise if one or all the needles gave out. Enough to give me a heads up that there is a problem. I don't think the cam would survive a failure of this nature however if the roller seized up. Geez.... lets don't talk about it.....lol
I'll just keep running high zinc and call it good.
AJ.... your inbox is full. I can't ask you a stupid question...lol
Roller lifter cams don't need much zinc because the rollers have very little friction as they travel around the cam lobe. A regular lifter has drag or has to slide over the lobe.any body know how much zppd dose a hydrolic roller lifter cam needs on a ppm scale?
yeah,..know all that,..but do thay need a certain amount? none at all?? lil bit? how much??Roller lifter cams don't need much zinc because the rollers have very little friction as they travel around the cam lobe. A regular lifter has drag or has to slide over the lobe.
I would say 600 ppmyeah,..know all that,..but do thay need a certain amount? none at all?? lil bit? how much??
You know all this hub bub about zinc, How many tens of thousands of flat tappet hydraulic engines are still running out there with nothing in the crankcase but whatever comes off the shelf nowdays. I don't remember hearing about a rash of flat cams since the early 80's when I worked at the GM store. Put a additive in just to be safe. I do but I don't measure it out down to the parts per million.
It happened all about the same time. Soft cam cores is what I always heard.i remember all those bad chev cams in the 80's and heard they were just poor quality.
I thought the zinc was lowered to save the catalytic converters?
When you are breaking in a flat tappet cam,.......I don't think that too much ZDDP can be a bad thing, period.
If you choose to use the modern oil of today, afterward. Your cam will have a shorter life then you're eng.
In other words, you will go through a few camshaft in the eng life. If anything in the valve train is not quite right. The cam life will be shortened even more. That could translate from days to years.
ALL the manufacturers had to either stop production of a motor or convert it over to roller lifter before the oil change could happen.
I truly believe that was why the jeep 4.0L(inline 6) when to the waste land. Chry should have made a double overhead cam with V.V.T. and that 4.0L would have RULED!........Ok that's a hole nother subject.
Bottom line ALL engs need a little ZDDP , we still have sliding part on are engs (piston rings sliding on bores for one)
Sliding, while spinning, flat tappet lifter require the most ZDDP.
And some will say, Ahh it a stock lift 318 with stock spring........It will be allright..........
just like tossing them loaded dice that come up roses every time,...........You will win every time until the casino escort You Out. aka, it a much higher percentage of success.....but it's going to bite you in the end.
just my opinions and some of it is from experience as well.
This depends on how aggressive a roller cam is being employed, it can put a much more significant side-load on the lifter body in the bore, a race roller's approach to theRoller lifter cams don't need much zinc because the rollers have very little friction as they travel around the cam lobe. A regular lifter has drag or has to slide over the lobe.