I suggest you use "flexseal" for your head gaskets...Being jealous of my aluminum heads is not becoming of you...
I suggest you use "flexseal" for your head gaskets...Being jealous of my aluminum heads is not becoming of you...
1 1/2 points of lost compression because of head Flex LOL that's got to be one of the most outlandish things I've ever heard on the internet....I suggest you use "flexseal" for your head gaskets...
huh? I said 1.5 points lost?? where???? LOL Jpegusesflexsealforheadgaskets1 1/2 points of lost compression because of head Flex LOL that's got to be one of the most outlandish things I've ever heard on the internet....
1 1/2 points of lost compression because of head Flex LOL that's got to be one of the most outlandish things I've ever heard on the internet....
1 1/2 points of lost compression because of head Flex LOL that's got to be one of the most outlandish things I've ever heard on the internet....
Jpeghasrubberheads, wrong guy maynardI'm not at all claiming that there's enough flex in an OHV head to account for 1.5 pts of compression.
That number is likely as old as replacement heads for flathead motors, which I could see flexing enough to account for 1.5 pts.
The thing is, most engines could get away with far more than +1.5 points without ever thinking about head material and so alum head makers can make that blanket suggestion without risking much. The +1.5 myth probably also helps sell alum heads because any performance gained would be from the compression, not the head material and no one wants to spend money for nothing..
However, head flex is 100% a thing. All heads 'lift' to an extent when under load, and all metal moves and deforms when under load. How much is highly variable, but alum tends to move twice as far as steel/iron for the same load, so in my mind the extra compression to account for deformation is the only thing which is based on science - but how much adjustment is needed? Likely not much if the engine is worth two ***** to begin with.
LOL 318hasvalveswillfly vs Jpeghasrubberheads
And you're never ending quest to try and throw a new call name on me continues...Jpeghasrubberheads, wrong guy maynard
To me.... It will never be the same. JpeghasrubberheadsAnd you're never ending quest to try and throw a new call name on me continues...
you will be always known as 318 has valves that will fly from the day jab called you that... Me Jason and I drive a Mopar and I will always be Jpar...
Oh boy!!!!!! Here we go......LOL 318hasvalveswillfly vs Jpeghasrubberheads
We have at least 3 threads going on this. Go back to the other thread and I laid it out there. Hughes is wrong. Read what I posted over there.
BTW, I think it was the road kill dude and the long haired Chrysler guy who's name...Dulcich...did a test with the dude form Westech...I'm horrible with names..I can see the faces but can't think of the names...did a test on aluminum verse CI and they found nothing.
Just like I have been doing since 1980.
And your promaxx heads you're going to buy before next summer will be made of?...Careful if you drop one of your heads, Jpeghasrubberheads, it will bounce up and hit the cealing in your garage
Post 1046. Quality heads = less flex. You'll certainly add some "bounce" to your car when you install 'emAnd your promaxx heads you're going to buy before next summer will be made of?...
I'm not at all claiming that there's enough flex in an OHV head to account for 1.5 pts of compression.
That number is likely as old as replacement heads for flathead motors, which I could see flexing enough to account for 1.5 pts.
The thing is, most engines could get away with far more than +1.5 points without ever thinking about head material and so alum head makers can make that blanket suggestion without risking much. The +1.5 myth probably also helps sell alum heads because any performance gained would be from the compression, not the head material and no one wants to spend money for nothing..
However, head flex is 100% a thing. All heads 'lift' to an extent when under load, and all metal moves and deforms when under load. How much is highly variable, but alum tends to move twice as far as steel/iron for the same load, so in my mind the extra compression to account for deformation is the only thing which is based on science - but how much adjustment is needed? Likely not much if the engine is worth two ***** to begin with.
for me I got one thing out of it all: cheap heads flex like a cartoon, thus the Jpeghasrubberheads I bet he can grab a hold of his rocker shaft mount pedestal and pull it up about 1.5 inches ????The last paragraph nails it. There isn't a cylinder head on any engine ever that doesn't lift and flex. There has never been one.
If there was, you could machine the head and block to flat and smooth and not use a gasket.
That's why you need a gasket. The head lifts and flexes and moves all over hell. Without a gasket you'd never get it sealed.
As one more proof I'm not nuts...if you use dead soft copper gaskets you know what a beeeeeeeeotch to get sealed. Not compression sealing, but coolant and oil sealing. That's because that dead soft copper gasket can not follow the head as it moves away from the deck and flexes with every single firing cycle.
My buddy had a blown iron 392 hemi we built and I begged him to let me Oring the the block and heads but some gasket maker promised him his dead soft copper gaskets would seal 10 pounds of roots boost without Orings. So I did it without the Orings.
It was in a roadster. When we fired it up and got it warm I walked around the engine and stuck my hand down by the head/block interface at all 4 corners. He said WTH are you doing...and I say I'm feeling the combustion leaking out past the gaskets!!!
So he sticks his hand down there and he feels it. He was pissed. That very day the engine came out, I took it back to work, pulled it all the way down and did the Orings.
You couldn't feel the combustion leaking at idle any more, but I promised him at full boost and full song it was leaking!
It's just the way that it is.
Oh boy!!!!!! Here we go......
Steve Brulé. (Say Brew-lay)
Car Craft - IIRC, did this as well with Chevy heads from - IIRC, Dart Cylinder Head and also found zero difference between the identical castings they make.
for me I got one thing out of it all: cheap heads flex like a cartoon, thus the Jpeghasrubberheads I bet he can grab a hold of his rocker shaft mount pedestal and pull it up about 1.5 inches ????
BWHAHAHHAHAAAA
Just be careful your flying valves don't bounce off his heads and back at you!
The last paragraph nails it. There isn't a cylinder head on any engine ever that doesn't lift and flex. There has never been one.
If there was, you could machine the head and block to flat and smooth and not use a gasket.
That's why you need a gasket. The head lifts and flexes and moves all over hell. Without a gasket you'd never get it sealed.
As one more proof I'm not nuts...if you use dead soft copper gaskets you know what a beeeeeeeeotch to get sealed. Not compression sealing, but coolant and oil sealing. That's because that dead soft copper gasket can not follow the head as it moves away from the deck and flexes with every single firing cycle.
My buddy had a blown iron 392 hemi we built and I begged him to let me Oring the the block and heads but some gasket maker promised him his dead soft copper gaskets would seal 10 pounds of roots boost without Orings. So I did it without the Orings.
It was in a roadster. When we fired it up and got it warm I walked around the engine and stuck my hand down by the head/block interface at all 4 corners. He said WTH are you doing...and I say I'm feeling the combustion leaking out past the gaskets!!!
So he sticks his hand down there and he feels it. He was pissed. That very day the engine came out, I took it back to work, pulled it all the way down and did the Orings.
You couldn't feel the combustion leaking at idle any more, but I promised him at full boost and full song it was leaking!
It's just the way that it is.