Wont happen. Not the first time this has been though of.whats your thoughts on the pending california split?
Oh I agree but hypothetically, good or bad idea?Wont happen. Not the first time this has been though of.
IMO, bad. splitting california into two states - Google Search been thought a few times.Oh I agree but hypothetically, good or bad idea?
Do you mean the political split or the one where half of it goes into the ocean?whats your thoughts on the pending california split?
Worked for West Virginia so it could be done.As noted by The San Diego Tribune, "New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as of the Congress."
So, that's that.
yep. was reading an article that the Colorado River no longer dumps into the Pacific Ocean as it once did. Why? Cause 100% of the water is scooped up and used by major metro areas like LA and others including VegasIn the west, it is ALL about the water...
In 1863! A bit different now...Worked for West Virginia so it could be done.
And Mexico is pissed about it. They get NONE of the water. Against a treaty Colorado river dispute - Wikipediayep. was reading an article that the Colorado River no longer dumps into the Pacific Ocean as it once did. Why? Cause 100% of the water is scooped up and used by major metro areas like LA and others including Vegas
Not a chance in hell today. Congress couldn't agree on which color to whitewash a church...Worked for West Virginia so it could be done.
Not a chance in hell today. Congress couldn't agree on which color to whitewash a church...
But they always agree to pass themselves pay raises(which i honestly think the people should have to vote on)Not a chance in hell today. Congress couldn't agree on which color to whitewash a church...
We should vote the whole lot of them to the curb. ALL.But they always agree to pass themselves pay raises(which i honestly think the people should have to vote on)
Agreed. 1000% but wont happen. Too many people vote solely on the R or D next to someone's name. Regardless of the candidates past/history or lies.We should vote the whole lot of them to the curb. ALL.
A politician with a shady history that lies? Isn’t that like saying redundantly redundant repeatedly?Agreed. 1000% but wont happen. Too many people vote solely on the R or D next to someone's name. Regardless of the candidates past/history or lies.
Two way street there. It depends on the limits for sure. Our local city council elections netted us 3 clowns that think they are smarter than everyone else but don't have a clue. The learning curve is so long that by the time they catch on to how things work it's time for another election.There should be term limits on every office.
But, knowing the ropes is part of the problem, IMO the more you know the system, the easier it is to get around it.Two way street there. It depends on the limits for sure. Our local city council elections netted us 3 clowns that think they are smarter than everyone else but don't have a clue. The learning curve is so long that by the time they catch on to how things work it's time for another election.