So is there an advantage to buying a “kit” as opposed to buying the parts separately with respect to balancing? Meaning are the kits custom balanced for the specific parts? Or are the parts selected for a given balance of a given crank?
Let me make one suggestion. Buy the rods from whoever you buy the crank and pistons from. If there was a problem, you don't want to be in a position where the people who sold you the crank and pistons say the rod failed, and vice versa. I avoid that potential problem when I can.Yeah I hear what your saying. Makes good sense because there is a lot of trust in all this work. If any of the machining isn’t right that can lead to critical failure. You have to trust someone at some point. I probably will go with new rods as in the end I won’t have to worry about metal fatigue and not really saving any appreciable money. I also don’t have a shop yet to work with. I WILL however have the balance checked out before I use anything as that to me is an investment in good judgment. Pay me now or pay me later…..
Yeah, but it took Chevy what.....20 years to finally catch on? I have a friend that has one in a snatch truck. He loves it.The 496 was a good idea for sure.
The crank wont be balanced unless you buy a kit with all the pieces together. If you buy the crank separately, whoever you buy it from wont know what rods and piston and stuff you will be using to be able to balance it. And that puts all the burden on you to provide all that info to the person that will balance it. If you transpose a number or if they do you can have a big problem, and that has happened. Plus when you buy a kit you usually get a package deal as opposed to buying the parts individually.So is there an advantage to buying a “kit” as opposed to buying the parts separately with respect to balancing? Meaning are the kits custom balanced for the specific parts? Or are the parts selected for a given balance of a given crank?
The crank wont be balanced unless you buy a kit with all the pieces together. If you buy the crank separately, whoever you buy it from wont know what rods and piston and stuff you will be using to be able to balance it. And that puts all the burden on you to provide all that info to the person that will balance it. If you transpose a number or if they do you can have a big problem, and that has happened. Plus when you buy a kit you usually get a package deal as opposed to buying the parts individually.
I have seen that happen as well. But my best suggestion is to take the kit to a shop and get them to check it. You really can't trust what you are buying anymore. I worked in a race shop for 15 years during the era when Scat and Eagle first came on the scene and rods still had to be reconditioned right out of the box and rods and pistons pin fit and rotating assemblies out of balance so bad that were supposed to be balanced, the engine would have jumped out of the engine compartment. Hope things have gotten better.....Sorry but i would not buy a kit with a balanced crank. Once you get the kit...look at the box of rods....bet they are all sealed up still...meaning they never weighted the rods individually....just took the numbers off the box...same thing with the pistons....just used the numbers on the box....Was using a machine shop that was doing the same thing but charging me full price for a balance job ....nope..never been back.....
I used HBR in Vegas...as you can see from the previous post everything is weighted individually ....showing calculations to get bobweight....and given a print out so that if anything is damaged it can be replaced .....plus he keeps a copy of the balance job. I asked Rick about the Kit balance job and he just laughed saying they have fixed many of them...If you are going to several thousands on a kit have it balanced correctly...
Do I even want to know what a snatch truck is?Yeah, but it took Chevy what.....20 years to finally catch on? I have a friend that has one in a snatch truck. He loves it.
Stop makin your car payments and you'll find out.Do I even want to know what a snatch truck is?
Oh, that kind of snatch.Stop makin your car payments and you'll find out.
Yeah. lolOh, that kind of snatch.
I wasn't aware the piston heads were that thick. That's over 1/4" (.250") difference. I bet the piston heads are pretty thin.My 340 has a 360 crank with the 340 pistons milled to clear deck. Old School Storker is what my dad/I wanted to build and he had a lot of parts lying around. I know it's not the cheapest but it does have stock rod/pistons. I apologize if I misunderstood and I am speaking way out in left field.
I wasn't aware the piston heads were that thick. That's over 1/4" (.250") difference. I bet the piston heads are pretty thin.
That makes more sense.I believed the 72-73 340 piston is used which has a lower CH of 1.74 ish verus the 70ish 340 piston 1.84 ish CH....So about .080 plus or minus needs to b e milled from the piston if you use the 360 1.66 CH....
Easier to buy 360 pistons these days....
So would that set up make it a 360? Are the pistons set up at 0 deck?My 340 has a 360 crank with the 340 pistons milled to clear deck. Old School Storker is what my dad/I wanted to build and he had a lot of parts lying around. I know it's not the cheapest but it does have stock rod/pistons. I apologize if I misunderstood and I am speaking way out in left field.
Thanks, this is really good firsthand inputs flyfish thanks for posting! Looks like this will be the best way to go.I've built 2 strokers for my car, both used Scat I-beams, and neither needed any Mallory to balance. The first stroker I had balanced at a local shop after I purchased parts individually (Forged Eagle crank, Scat I-beams, Diamond forged pistons). That engine ran great (high to mid 10's).
The current stroker that is in the car was a Scat pre-balanced kit (Scat forged crank, Scat I-beams, forged Icon pistons). This saved me money on balancing, and to be fair, I was a little skeptical of the pre-balanced kit thing.....but after 3 race seasons of low 10 second passes, I'd say it turned out ok.
I guess do what you are comfortable with, but I personally think the Scat I-beams are the most cost effective option for quality small block Mopar rods.
I lost my sheet with all the numbers on my 340 build, it was in early 2002. It is probably pretty close, it doesn't like pump gas. When first built it didn't like pump gas much then I blew a head gasket and when I put the heads back on 2 years ago I must have put a thinner head gasket because it really doesn't like pump gas. It does just fine for putting around close to the home. Yes like AaronK says it's about 372 +/- and it would be cheaper to build it a different way. LOLSo would that set up make it a 360? Are the pistons set up at 0 deck?
Thanks interesting build! I for sure will buy aluminum heads because of the Arizona heat and shitty fuel. I hate fighting detonation and retarding a hot motor!I lost my sheet with all the numbers on my 340 build, it was in early 2002. It is probably pretty close, it doesn't like pump gas. When first built it didn't like pump gas much then I blew a head gasket and when I put the heads back on 2 years ago I must have put a thinner head gasket because it really doesn't like pump gas. It does just fine for putting around close to the home. Yes like AaronK says it's about 372 +/- and it would be cheaper to build it a different way. LOL
View attachment 1715849188
A lot goes into fighting detonation. Cam timing, chamber design, timing curve, quench, cooling system and more. There are a lot smarter people than me on here that can help you out with the mathmatics. And figure dynamic and static compression. It's just not me.