TKX performance improvements?

-

matt030305

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2023
Messages
77
Reaction score
30
Location
new York
Hello all, I am looking to do a SST TKX 5 speed swap on my duster that has a 727TF. My question is: without swapping anything else, how much of an improvement in acceleration/performance would I be able to see from doing this? (Not accounting for human error in shifting)

If anyone has a before and after 5 speed swap ETs, what was the improvement? Thanks
 
It might be helpful to get a more accurate answer if you would tell us what all of your combo is NOW. You know what car you have and how it's built now. We don't.
 
I have a 69 Charger with a 727 that I’m swapping out to a TKX. A TKX will not be quicker than an 727 automatic.
 
I’m curious how much floor cutting is needed for that 5 speed in a 67-76 abody floor compared to a stock 4 speed. I want over drive but not the hydraulic clutch set up.

Sorry OP - I did not mean to steal the post. Back to you sir.
 
Which TKX, the wide ratio, or close ratio?

For 1/4 mile ET a good torque converter in a 727 would be a better choice.
 
Hello all, I am looking to do a SST TKX 5 speed swap on my duster that has a 727TF. My question is: without swapping anything else, how much of an improvement in acceleration/performance would I be able to see from doing this? (Not accounting for human error in shifting)

If anyone has a before and after 5 speed swap ETs, what was the improvement? Thanks
An auto will generally be faster than a human shifting.
It is important to know at the very least engine specs and rear gear, also which gear set you chose in the TKX.

I’m curious how much floor cutting is needed for that

I cannot speak to an A-body or the TKX but on my TKO and E-body I had to cut the tunnel. Bigger tunnel but the TKO is a much blockier taller trans. The TKX has improvements in case size and profile making it less tall and more round on top.
 
It might be helpful to get a more accurate answer if you would tell us what all of your combo is NOW. You know what car you have and how it's built now. We don't.
Mild build LC 340 with around 330hp, 3.23 gears (gear is because I do a decent amount of highway cruising) and standard 727. If I got 3.91 gears in the back along with the 5 speed, how much of a difference would that make?
 
I’m curious how much floor cutting is needed for that 5 speed in a 67-76 abody floor compared to a stock 4 speed. I want over drive but not the hydraulic clutch set up.

Sorry OP - I did not mean to steal the post. Back to you sir.
It’s really not a lot, there are multiple posts that show how much cutting is needed. If you choose to get the conversion kit, they give you the sheet metal and template in order to modify your tunnel.
 
Which TKX, the wide ratio, or close ratio?

For 1/4 mile ET a good torque converter in a 727 would be a better choice.
Wide ratio, I was told having those gears would be better for acceleration. I just want to know how big of a difference it truly makes before I go and spend $5800 for the kit.
 
From what I see there are at least three different OD ratios for that transmission. .68, .72 and .81. I see what I would consider a "wide ratio", but it's also available in the three OD ratios above.
 
So I had a 340, 727, 4.30 gears, 275-60-15 tires and a crappy converter it ran 12.4@106 in the quarter at 4200' air is always 6K+ during the summer here. I hurt the engine racing a mustang a half mile, I won but lost a rod bearing. Engine knock and no legs to run down the highway had me bummed, so I did the logical thing and built a stroker and put in a TKO. It is a Keisler engineering machined TKO trans to fit without much trimming, it did but didn't. The TKX is way better in all the right ways, and that's what I'll go with when it breaks. I just recently trimmed the floor and upper crossmember for more clearance so it had more room and can be changed easily for when I break it out in America somewhere.
On the performance side with the 422 3.23 gears and 275-60-15m it ran 12.4 at 116 -118 mph 1.99 60' BUT I could drive to the track 65 miles at any speed I wanted comfortably and not get passed by minivans and Yugos. I had swapped the 4.30s to 3.90 I didn't have 3.55s so I used the 3.23s which I'm happy with. The 3.90s were worthless too much multiplication and no traction, the 1-2 shift was also super early and would break traction badly in second. Now with a 340 I'm thinking 3.55 3.73 would be the ticket as my 340 was happy to 7000K but my 422 got lazy around 5600 5800rpm but the torque difference is significant. The TKO OD trans is the best thing I've ever done to my car period. I did opt for an aluminum flywheel on the 422 and a small clutch for light weight and it's great until you want to just lug out of a drive through. With the upper 240 and lower 250 106 duration cam single plane intake it can be slightly surgy but it's worth it IMO as it just feels so snappy and responsive everywhere. If you have less cam or don't mind it being a little rowdy at idle in gear I highly recommend the aluminum flywheel and a lightweight clutch. Now the gearing of the trans is very important as that should take advantage of your engine specs, rear gear and what your driving conditions are as well as your rear tire size for highway driving. With 3.23 and the .068 OD and 275-60-15 at 75 I was 1700 1800 rpm and your 340 might be lacking torque below 2k to enjoy that but mildly camed dual plane 340 might be fine. Lean on the product manufacturer to help you choose the right ratios for your needs and wants. Good luck and happy shifting.
 
Last edited:
I know that my car was quicker with the automatic but I like driving it more since I converted it to a Tremec 5 speed.

000 E.JPG


Fuel economy isn't my main goal but reduced noise on the freeway, 80 mph at 2300 rpms and better fuel economy are great things to have.
The TKO that I have isn't as smooth shifting as the TKXs are supposed to be.
The close ratio has a taller 1st gear. Something like a 2.87 1st versus a 3.27 with the wide ratio.
Wide ratio units are great for stock or close to stock engines with a wide power band. Higher performance engines make power in a narrower range so the close ratio units are much better for them.
 
without swapping anything else, how much of an improvement in acceleration/performance would I be able to see from doing this?
Are we talking on the street?
Then the manual will very likely be slower.
Here is just one reason;
With the close ratio, the gear ratios are
2.87-1.89-1.28-1.00 the od ratios are one of .68/.72/.81
Lets say you are currently running 3.23s in the back with your 727.
Assuming no wheelspin, Your acceleration will be directly related to your roadgears times your engine torque. With the auto, your roadgears would be
7.91-4.68-3.23. However, your convertor has a torque-multiplier inside it that continuously varies the output torque greater than the input torque, by a factor of, at WOT, of close to 2:1 with the vehicle stopped, and automatically decreasing with roadspeed to end up near 1.1 at say 100mph. Let's say in your case, it starts at 1.8, and averages to 1.3 in Second gear. Your new roadgears are
14.34 at a dead stop, diminishing to say 11.8 on the 1-2 shift, then averaging 6.08 in Second and averaging 3.55 in Third gear. All of these are at WOT.
Here they are in a string;
14.34-11.8-6.08-3.55, diminishing to say 3.39 at cruize

Now lets look at the 5-M/T; Roadgears are
9.27-6.10-4.13-3.23-2.62 (.81 od)

As a streeter, you are only concerned with up to around 6.5 gear ratios which will get you to 65 mph in a jiffy. So with the 727, you get the equivalent of THREE gears to 60, ending at 6.08.. Whereas
with the 5-speed you get TWO ratios, ending at 6.10.
Guess which combo will be quicker to 60 ...... without tirespin.
-----------------------------------
Looking to the Eighth, we see 3.55s to the auto, versus 4.13s to the 5-speed; not enough to catch up.
Looking to the Quarter we see that neither has appropriate gears, but the stick car might have an edge, if it catches up early enough.
You said
"without swapping anything else."
IMO this is a mistake.

The 5-speed wants deeper gears, and then it just may out-perform the auto car.
Lets say you regear the 5 speed and let's say you do it with the .81 overdrive. this will then allow 3.91s; so lets recalculate the roadgears. I get
11.22-7.39- .500- 3.91-3.17od final drive. Now lets compare that to the auto
14.34>11.80-6.08-3.55-(3.23 cruize with a loc-up)
Tuff call who wins, but if I had to bet, I would still bet on the auto.

Save your cash, install a hi-stall.
Already got one?
then install a supercharger.

You just like shifting?
Then install a manual VB and a floor shifter.

What a Mopar streeter really needs, IMO, is an A518./hi-stall/loc-up, and something like 4.30s. Here are those gears;
2.45-1.45-1.00-.69 and in roadgears with 4.30s, adjusted as before;
18.96>13.68-8.10-5.16-3.26-2.97 in loc-up........ or, with 3.55s
15.65>11.29-6.68-4.26-2.67-2.45 in loc-up ........... Yeah, I'm liking that one.

Or solve all your problems with a supercharger, the regular TF, and something like 2.76 gears. If the super adds 50% to your low-rpm torque, it will feel like the 3.23s are 4.85s, and so
2.45-1.45-1.00s would, in roadgears, feel like
21.37>16.61-9.83-5.33- all at WOT, going to 3.39 at cruize. Those numbers are so big, you could run 2.76rear gears, for
18.25>14.2-8.40-4.97 all at WOT, going to 2.90 at cruize
Or, you know, with a super, you can run ridiculously low rear gears.

But I gotta tell ya, if your current street-combo at WOT, is already spinning the tires all the way thru First gear, and half way thru Second; more power will not make your car any quicker to 60mph. Fix this first.
 
Last edited:
Are we talking on the street?
Then the manual will very likely be slower.
Here is just one reason;
With the close ratio, the gear ratios are
2.87-1.89-1.28-1.00 the od ratios are one of .68/.72/.81
Lets say you are currently running 3.23s in the back with your 727.
Assuming no wheelspin, Your acceleration will be directly related to your roadgears times your engine torque. With the auto, your roadgears would be
7.91-4.68-3.23. However, your convertor has a torque-multiplier inside it that continuously varies the output torque greater than the input torque, by a factor of, at WOT, of close to 2:1 with the vehicle stopped, and automatically decreasing with roadspeed to end up near 1.1 at say 100mph. Let's say in your case, it starts at 1.8, and averages to 1.3 in Second gear. Your new roadgears are
14.34 at a dead stop, diminishing to say 11.8 on the 1-2 shift, then averaging 6.08 in Second and averaging 3.55 in Third gear. All of these are at WOT.
Here they are in a string;
14.34-11.8-6.08-3.55, diminishing to say 3.39 at cruize

Now lets look at the 5-M/T; Roadgears are
9.27-6.10-4.13-3.23-2.62 (.81 od)

As a streeter, you are only concerned with up to around 6.5 gear ratios which will get you to 65 mph in a jiffy. So with the 727, you get the equivalent of THREE gears to 60, ending at 6.08.. Whereas
with the 5-speed you get TWO ratios, ending at 6.10.
Guess which combo will be quicker to 60 ...... without tirespin.
-----------------------------------
Looking to the Eighth, we see 3.55s to the auto, versus 4.13s to the 5-speed; not enough to catch up.
Looking to the Quarter we see that neither has appropriate gears, but the stick car might have an edge, if it catches up early enough.
You said
"without swapping anything else."
IMO this is a mistake.

The 5-speed wants deeper gears, and then it just may out-perform the auto car.
Lets say you regear the 5 speed and let's say you do it with the .81 overdrive. this will then allow 3.91s; so lets recalculate the roadgears. I get
11.22-7.39- .500- 3.91-3.17od final drive. Now lets compare that to the auto
14.34>11.80-6.08-3.55-(3.23 cruize with a loc-up)
Tuff call who wins, but if I had to bet, I would still bet on the auto.

Save your cash, install a hi-stall.
Already got one?
then install a supercharger.

You just like shifting?
Then install a manual VB and a floor shifter.

What a Mopar streeter really needs, IMO, is an A518./hi-stall/loc-up, and something like 4.30s. Here are those gears;
2.45-1.45-1.00-.69 and in roadgears with 4.30s, adjusted as before;
18.96>13.68-8.10-5.16-3.26-2.97 in loc-up........ or, with 3.55s
15.65>11.29-6.68-4.26-2.67-2.45 in loc-up ........... Yeah, I'm liking that one.

Or solve all your problems with a supercharger, the regular TF, and something like 2.76 gears. If the super adds 50% to your low-rpm torque, it will feel like the 3.23s are 4.85s, and so
2.45-1.45-1.00s would, in roadgears, feel like
21.37>16.61-9.83-5.33- all at WOT, going to 3.39 at cruize. Those numbers are so big, you could run 2.76rear gears, for
18.25>14.2-8.40-4.97 all at WOT, going to 2.90 at cruize
Or, you know, with a super, you can run ridiculously low rear gears.

But I gotta tell ya, if your current street-combo at WOT, is already spinning the tires all the way thru First gear, and half way thru Second; more power will not make your car any quicker to 60mph. Fix this first.
I’m relatively new to the community as I bought my duster about 2 years ago and I did not know about the A518! That would solve all my problems. What is the swap like? Just bolt on and go?
 
The 518 bolts up to the 273-318-340-360 but the overdrive part of the transmission is larger in diameter than the transmission tunnel in the cars. ALL 500 and 518s were in trucks and vans where clearance wasn't a problem.
Hey....If you can cut and weld, it isn't that hard to do.
 
-
Back
Top