yeah, most wouldn't put a 750 Double pumper on a stock 360 with stock converter and 2.76's..... I get told all the time how I do it wrong, ya know, traction bars on a Mopar? And that Carb?Unbelievably impressive...
Last edited:
yeah, most wouldn't put a 750 Double pumper on a stock 360 with stock converter and 2.76's..... I get told all the time how I do it wrong, ya know, traction bars on a Mopar? And that Carb?Unbelievably impressive...
How is it that you feel your car defies all the other schools of logic?...yeah, most wouldn't put a 750 Double pumper on a stock 360 with stock converter and 2.76's..... I get told all the time how I do it wrong, ya know, traction bars on a Mopar? And that carb?? and then the same will say it's unbelievably fast.... LOL.... I love people
there is only one logic with me.... give the car what it wants.How is it that you feel your car defies all the other schools of logic?...
there is only one logic with me.... give the car what it wants. Once all people were taught the earth was flat..... if everyone is saying it, it must be true? All computer calculators and magazines think a 600 cfm is the best choice for my car. I started with a 600, and I believe i'm on my 4th carb and it has gone the quickest with the 750 dp. Now how many, even on this sight would have tried? Not very many. And they'd still have a 14 second car....
LOL.... I can think of somebody.....Let's see has anybody tried putting dual quads on a 318.....?
Unbelievably impressive...
He's an expert tuner...
I sense a lot of sarcasm in these posts.....How is it that you feel your car defies all the other schools of logic?...
I gave yr some as well. I called him Colonel Flagg LOL....I sense a lot of sarcasm in these posts.....
There is no denying 318wr can tune a car.
He has been doing more with less than anybody I know. So your remakes to discredit him are not funny. If you ask him for help on yours, he is more than happy to help you as you know.
He has done amazing things with his Dusters. He will be kicking a 4 in strokers butt with a stock 360 short block ET wise by the end of summer.
Why? Because he can tune an tweak like few others and he knows his cars and how they react.
If your modified 340 or 360 or 408 can't break 13.00 either it's the car, the engine, the driver or a combo of the 3.
I plan to outrun him by the end of summer with a stock stroke. lol
Well the first comment was obviously joking at you...I sense a lot of sarcasm in these posts.....
If I wasn't constantly busting 318hasvalvesthatwillflies nuts he would probably call me on my personal phone and ask me if I'm feeling okay....There is no denying 318wr can tune a car.
He has been doing more with less than anybody I know. So your remakes to discredit him are not funny. If you ask him for help on yours, he is more than happy to help you as you know.
He has done amazing things with his Dusters. He will be kicking a 4 in strokers butt with a stock 360 short block ET wise by the end of summer.
Why? Because he can tune an tweak like few others and he knows his cars and how they react.
If your modified 340 or 360 or 408 can't break 13.00 either it's the car, the engine, the driver or a combo of the 3.
I plan to outrun him by the end of summer with a stock stroke. lol
FYI--- The end of summer is only 45 short days away...I plan to outrun him by the end of summer with a stock stroke. lol
Well the first comment was obviously joking at you...
Actually the second I was giving you full complement for being a great tuner.
And the third comment I thought I gave you a good introduction for you to tell us more...
If I wasn't constantly busting 318hasvalvesthatwillflies nuts he would probably call me on my personal phone and ask me if I'm feeling okay....
He as well as you know anything I have is yours for the asking... (Within reason)
Forgive me for being old. Sometimes I get a little differant.
That being the case j par, i still need 35 spline 28in axles, a 35 spline spool and 4.88 dana 60 gears. If you have any of these parts, I can pay shipping.
Back in the 70s we saw many 340 abodys that ran mid 13s with mild modifcations.
The OP I believe has high 12 capabilitys.
I took the first comment as a joke.Well the first comment was obviously joking at you...
Actually the second I was giving you full complement for being a great tuner.
And the third comment I thought I gave you a good introduction for you to tell us more...
I was there... too. I thought I had a decent build, as you described. Until a guy with much less ran a second faster than me. I wasn't upset, I only wanted to learn the "why's". I don't count myself as a super tuner or anything of the sort. But my personal expectations for my cars and what I demand from them is what I learned from the past. I don't put my cars on pedestals, and I fully believe anyone can get the same results because I'm not special... LOL, and is why I said I thought the op would hit low 13's, or high 12's. I would except nothing less than a 12 second pass with his combo myself.I agree. Key word is “ with mild modifications”
Smogger motor with pistons way in the hole, stock smog heads, highway gears, stock cam and convertor, etc, aren't what would normally be considered “ mild modifications”.
Usually it would be an aluminum intake, gears, camshaft with some lift and duration and maybe a “ streeter” type 10 inch convertor. Least that is my experience. What were called bolt on’s in my world
I had a bone stock 70 Duster not all that long ago. 54000 miles, factory 340 bench seat car. Factory heads had never been off of it.... ultimately it became a sleeper uncut/ untubbed full interior 9 sec car a few years later
My first effort to make it faster was 3310 carb, dual plane intake, hughes 230/238 hydraulic cam, 3k Coan convertor and 4.10 gears. Weighed about 3420 with me( i am 6’5 300+)
I remember well the night it broke into the 12’s with the above mods. Stock 340 shortblock that had never been apart and factory rocker gear still. Shifted it off the column had rev man valve body. Remember how happy i was. Nearly 1.5 sec gain over bone stock like it was when i got it
I was there... too. I thought I had a decent build, as you described. Until a guy with much less ran a second faster than me. I wasn't upset, I only wanted to learn the "why's". I don't count myself as a super tuner or anything of the sort. But my personal expectations for my cars and what I demand from them is what I learned from the past. I don't put my cars on pedestals, and I fully believe anyone can get the same results because I'm not special... LOL, and is why I said I thought the op would hit low 13's, or high 12's. I would except nothing less than a 12 second pass with his combo myself.
100% agree! A lot of "12 second" street cars go down to make a 14 second pass... LOL. And it isn't always traction, sometimes they have a 12 second car because somebody "told" them it should be 12's... LOLAgree completely
I would add( and i bet you agree) thinking what something will run, and actually getting to the track and putting down the number are way more often than not two completely different things.
The OP has some good parts, no doubt. But getting to the track can be extremely sobering..... lol..... just the tire he has on the car could make a 1/2 sec difference in ET..... one way or another
Sorry the only thing that I got even close on that list is 410 Dana gears...Forgive me for being old. Sometimes I get a little differant.
That being the case j par, i still need 35 spline 28in axles, a 35 spline spool and 4.88 dana 60 gears. If you have any of these parts, I can pay shipping.
Back in the 70s we saw many 340 abodys that ran mid 13s with mild modifcations.
The OP I believe has high 12 capabilitys.
100% agree! A lot of "12 second" street cars go down to make a 14 second pass... LOL. And it isn't always traction, sometimes they have a 12
Maybe somebody has 488's and will take four tens in trade?????Sorry the only thing that I got even close on that list is 410 Dana gears...
3.23 gears and stock convertor it isnt going to run anywhere close to real low 13’s. Maybe real high 13’s if i had to guess.
Back in 1972 i had a 69 340 swinger. Headers and 3.55 gears. Ran 14.23
This should run better than that no doubt. I will say 13.70’s- 13.80’s
This all assumes he has a stock convertor
Agree completely
I would add( and i bet you agree) thinking what something will run, and actually getting to the track and putting down the number are way more often than not two completely different things.
The OP has some good parts, no doubt. But getting to the track can be extremely sobering..... lol..... just the tire he has on the car could make a 1/2 sec difference in ET..... one way or another