What's Your Stand On Stance?!

-
MrJLR

MrJLR

Built, not bought
FABO Gold Member
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
5,619
Reaction score
6,712
Location
Menifee, California
Some like them slammed...
Some like it stock...
Me, I like my '70's "stink bug" stance...
To each their own. ...it's all good as long as it's Mopar!
Post 'em up...here's mine!

20170324_135017.jpg
20170319_122459.jpg
20150823_134620_zpssx5x57rm.jpg


Jeff
 
A couple of inches of rake, car lowered as much as you can and still street drive it, rear tires as tall and wide as possible WITHOUT sticking out of quarters.
 
MrJLR said:
@Mopar-Man
what is it exactly that you disagree with?

Jeff
Click to expand...

First of all, you have a beautiful car. But, if you are going to run the same size tires then the car will look better leveled. But the way you have it sitting, it needs a taller rear tire. The distance from the top of the tire to the wheel opening front and rear should be almost the same. Also, it looks better to have the front/rear track the same OR the rear slightly wider.

This is just my opinion and you asked so there ya go.
 
MrJLR said:
Some like them slammed...
Some like it stock...
Me, I like my '70's "stink bug" stance...
To each their own. ...it's all good as long as it's Mopar!
Post 'em up...here's mine!

View attachment 1715042381 View attachment 1715042382 View attachment 1715042383

Jeff
Click to expand...


I know many members aren't going to like it but I prefer the "PISSED OFF" stink bug look of the late 60s early 70s:

DSC04130.JPG
DSC04131.JPG
DSC04132.JPG



DSC04130.JPG
DSC04131.JPG
DSC04132.JPG


I've recently added a few 60s stickers:
DSC05460.JPG
DSC05461.JPG



And I don't need a super low profile jack to get the car high enough to get a regular jack under the frame....I just lay on the ground and slide under the car to do any work!!
Treblig
 
For some reason I have always liked Mopars a bit over stock height on both ends with a slight rake.

dart2a.jpg
 
Mopar-Man said:
First of all, you have a beautiful car. But, if you are going to run the same size tires then the car will look better leveled. But the way you have it sitting, it needs a taller rear tire. The distance from the top of the tire to the wheel opening front and rear should be almost the same. Also, it looks better to have the front/rear track the same OR the rear slightly wider.

This is just my opinion and you asked so there ya go.
Click to expand...
To each his own...like I said.

Jeff
 
Treblig said:
I know many members aren't going to like it but I prefer the "PISSED OFF" stink bug look of the late 60s early 70s:

View attachment 1715042403 View attachment 1715042404 View attachment 1715042405


View attachment 1715042403 View attachment 1715042404 View attachment 1715042405

I've recently added a few 60s stickers:
View attachment 1715042406 View attachment 1715042407


And I don't need a super low profile jack to get the car high enough to get a regular jack under the frame....I just lay on the ground and slide under the car to do any work!!
Treblig
Click to expand...
Badass!

Jeff
 
honestly, I don't have a preference. there's some cars that look good slammed, others look good shackled up with huge rear tires, other's stock. I guess I like them all
 
I prefer super huge tires on tiny 14" wheels that are too narrow for the tires I run on them. Jack the front up all the way and use shackles out back to get er' up even higher. 4x4 stance.

Nah..kidding. There are so many wheel/tire combos it's too had to say what looks right with each one. I'm not a huge fan of seeing a lot of space/air above the tires. I like a slight rake.

20150430_150814.jpg


20150430_162407.jpg


660ft June 14th 2015.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top