mopowers
Well-Known Member
I believe your #1 circle in the photo above may be the valve cover bolt boss? No problem if you break through, but fyi none-the-less.
I believe your #1 circle in the photo above may be the valve cover bolt boss? No problem if you break through, but fyi none-the-less.
It'd be nice to cut one of these in half
You have two, right? LOL
Excuse me I thought you had them off already.What heads? My xheads are still on my running car... right under that box... the heads I'm practicing on were one man's trash and my treasure. Lol. They are all old 70s 360 heads with 1.88/1.60 valves.
View attachment 1715664231
View attachment 1715664232
It's in his blood to drill and grind on things.I think Doc is just a busy body looking for something to mess with. Nothing wrong with that, good luck on your porting.
I think Doc is just a busy body looking for something to mess with. Nothing wrong with that, good luck on your porting.
Excuse me I thought you had them off already.
If it's running OK know dont mess with it.
Porting your X heads or swapping them for some chinese aluminum heads will gain you nothing without making alot other expensive $ changes.
You have a cool car enjoy what you have and dont fix it if its not broke.
Some day when your practice is fully developed you can have a collection of Mopars to work on.
Thanks! Also wasn't trying to offend when saying the xheads were on the car. These are my practice heads before pulling the xheads. Maybe ill get lucky and suck at porting/cleaning up the heads to where I won't want to yank my xheads off lol.
Yeah I've been thinking of the problems I may end up with if I go to aluminum cnc heads... would need other expensive parts to I go along with the heads...
The car runs great right now, anything else you do is going to impair drivability to an extent. Higher flowing heads will help your top end, but hurt the low end. Based on where you've been liking your shift points I doubt you'd really enjoy having an engine with high-flowing heads.
The alternative is more cubic inches under those heads - which will bring more torque into the low end while taking advantage of the higher flowing heads. Then you're also likely looking at changing the cam to make it a better fit for more cubes, and more cubes means more exhaust gas which means headers, new exhaust, etc.
You've got some of the best factory heads on a stout short block that runs very close to how you want it to. Unless the valve guides are leaking oil, I'd cast another vote to leave them alone. I'd still port and rebuild the other x-heads you have so that when your guides DO start to leak or you have other issues, you'll have replacement heads you can swap right on and keep right on driving.
I did a thing... I think I need to use more pressure on the next port... when doing to light if pressure it likes to jump a little more and occasionally catch and jerk and jump really hard especially when trying to get into these little spots where the flathead is pointing...
View attachment 1715667042
View attachment 1715667043
View attachment 1715667044
Let us know when you're done.
That was like an hour of "work" and it looks horrible lol
You need to be able to control cutter speed. You just can’t run them wide open all the time. I can use either but I prefer an air grinder.
It looks like your carbides have a pretty big diameter . When the ports are as small as what you are doing, and you need all the area you can get, I don’t use anything bigger than 1/2 inch and 3/8 most of the time.
A big corner radius in a perfect world is best. That head ain’t near perfect nor can it be made perfect. So corner radius need to be 1/2 or smaller. I’ve done some at 1/4 inch but that was a giant PITA for little return.
Look at the W2 port. It is to small for anything 340 inches and smaller over about 8000 RPM and as the displacement goes up the RPM at which the head is the limit goes down.
If you want to make the W2 enough cross section for stuff like that the option is to make them square. Another giant PITA.
You need to learn the relationship between cross section, displacement, RPM, Rod to stroke ratio (it matters), camshaft LSA, induction, exhaust, chassis, gearing and such.
Yea I was thinking a smaller tree shaped burr might be good, maybe Ill go get one.
I have an pneumatic grinder as well. Maybe ill try that one out, I just don't have a big air tank.
Get some stones and sanding rolls. Burrs are great for removing big chunks, but lack finesse until you get good with them. Stones and paper are easier to control and also blend better because of the built in flexibility. Stones typically won't load up with steel like they do with AL. You're going to want them anyway to finish the ports, might as well get some on hand and see how they compare. You might wind up saving some time or frustration.
Long tapered paper rolls are available and can work great around the guide bosses.
I have some stones, they don't have a long shank though... maybe ill need a dremel to use them better.
You can get Shank extentions. They can limit your reach sometimes, but still useful.
I have a ton of good quality rolls I could give you a good deal on some??
I tried the "shank extension" but the ones I've seen/bought/used have set screws in them. So its impossible to get the burr centered in the extension. It ends up "offset" in the extension.
Hope that makes sense?
View attachment 1715667114
View attachment 1715667115