Not as low as yours no .. But i like my stuff lower then most . Yours looks good . I did have one as low as yours but it was not a dart . it was my old dakota .
Damn what did i do to you ! . That was just messed up lmao . Really tho We cut one coil in the front one . and 3 inch blocks in the back .That was not lowered, that was spring sag in your Dakota's springs from dragging your big @ss around....
Those springs were just plumb worn out and tired.... LOL!
Damn what did i do to you ! . That was just messed up lmao . Really tho We cut one coil in the front one . and 3 inch blocks in the back .
Just wondering cause I havent been able to find any others on the wonderful world or interwebs... so how bout it guys?
Just wondering cause I havent been able to find any others on the wonderful world or interwebs... so how bout it guys?
Heres a pic or 2 lol
They look doofy lowered. If your doing it for handling that's about the best reason.
Well the chicks dig it because it drags the ground! :finga: lol
This 72 I'm building is pretty low suspension wise. I'm thinking about 2" drop spindles to get the front down a bit more and a narrower wheel up front as well. I like a certain stance and I'm not quite feeling good about it yet.
I have two things that are bugging me about the stance. The front tire track width looks so wide compared to the back. Then I would like the front about an inch lower.
I'm running the 18X9" fronts with 6.3"B.S. it also has a deep dish look with a lot of lip. I'm thinking a stock 17"X8" wheel with less outer lip might look better on the front even though the track width will probably be about the same if a spacer is needed to clear the tie rod.
I'm down pretty much on the bump stops that I shaved 1/2" off of and I still think it would look better about an inch lower.
No headers so no ground clearance issues. I also run pretty tall tires so the car doesn't really look as low as it is.