Uncle Tony got a "sore hiney" in Andy Wood's comment section of his last video. Andy said in the video basically that"it's a waste of time to massage stock 318 parts,it wont make 300 HP..."
Not even worth commenting onYou forgot the orange paint, even if it's a 70s blue paint motor, the orange paint always adds extra power.
just took a like at the comments and tony is right and why is that motor taking sooo long..Alot of fun in the comments section over there...
Uncle Tony got a "sore hiney" in Andy Wood's comment section of his last video. Andy said in the video basically that"it's a waste of time to massage stock 318 parts,it wont make 300 HP..."
Yeah.. it might as well be a build on powernation now....Stock 318. Aftermarket pistons but still in the whole? But they are replacing the rods with ones longer to zero deck it? WTF are they thinking. DV polished the beams on that stock rod because he could and it didn't cost anything but time. It will make the rod stronger but it won't increase the performance. He could recondition the rod and add a new set of ARP bolts and it would be good to 400+ HP. Oh, and I didn't know that a larger bore increases compression. WTF
and why is that motor taking sooo long..
Yeah.. it might as well be a build on powernation now....
I stopped watching these guys over a year ago and this is reminding me why
Transportation of the heads is happening on this Monday coming if all goes according to plan.We shall see I suppose. I hope its done in a year. Servedio has to be about wrapped up with the top end flow bench tests.
Lots of RPM!GTX JOHN said that his 318 has a compression ratio of 8.5:1. I used the Wallace Dynamic Compression Ratio Calculator, I put in all of the required information, I used a 72* ivc because he said that his cam has lots of duration so I checked out cams and the one's that had 300 plus degrees of duration had at least 72* ivc. After I entered all of the information the Calculator shows a Dynamic compression ratio of 6.37:1 which equals a cranking pressure of 108.24 psi. I'm not saying that his car doesn't run 10's. I'm asking how can a engine make the power it needs to move a 3400 pound car into the 10 second zone with a low dcr? Again, this is only a question, I'm not saying that he didn't run those times
GTX JOHN said that his 318 has a compression ratio of 8.5:1. I used the Wallace Dynamic Compression Ratio Calculator, I put in all of the required information, I used a 72* ivc because he said that his cam has lots of duration so I checked out cams and the one's that had 300 plus degrees of duration had at least 72* ivc. After I entered all of the information the Calculator shows a Dynamic compression ratio of 6.37:1 which equals a cranking pressure of 108.24 psi. I'm not saying that his car doesn't run 10's. I'm asking how can a engine make the power it needs to move a 3400 pound car into the 10 second zone with a low dcr? Again, this is only a question, I'm not saying that he didn't run those times
He said that it had a 8.5:1 compression ratio, had nothing to do with my math.The thing is that Stock and Super Stock have a nominal compression ratio and they get a point over that. If his engine builder has his **** together then it’s a point over nominal.
So your math with 8.5:1 isn’t valid.
What lsa?He said that it had a 8.5:1 compression ratio, had nothing to do with my math.
It’s all in what you don’t understand and I’m not the best at it ether. However, when you start in with the math, the correct numbers have to be entered and not assumed. Fact check his cam card and what he did with it installed wise.GTX JOHN said that his 318 has a compression ratio of 8.5:1. I used the Wallace Dynamic Compression Ratio Calculator, I put in all of the required information, I used a 72* ivc because he said that his cam has lots of duration so I checked out cams and the one's that had 300 plus degrees of duration had at least 72* ivc. After I entered all of the information the Calculator shows a Dynamic compression ratio of 6.37:1 which equals a cranking pressure of 108.24 psi. I'm not saying that his car doesn't run 10's. I'm asking how can an engine make the power it needs to move a 3400 pound car into the 10 second zone with a low dcr? Again, this is only a question, I'm not saying that he didn't run those times
The thing is that Stock and Super Stock have a nominal compression ratio and they get a point over that. If his engine builder has his **** together then it’s a point over nominal.
So your math with 8.5:1 isn’t valid.
I'm not saying that it's impossible to make hp with a low cr. TheWhat lsa?
It’s not impossible to make hp with low cr it’s just gonna make more with higher cr.
Please explain the term Stock. Sounds like those 302 heads are a good way to go for better performanceIt’s all in what you don’t understand and I’m not the best at it ether. However, when you start in with the math, the correct numbers have to be entered and not assumed. Fact check his cam card and what he did with it installed wise.
To much faith in calculators is a huge problem.
And then you all wonder why I give AJ a “So-called hard time.”
Stock, super stock, FAST, defying all calculations and the odds that they can run fast. So many fail to realize there are tricks to be done that actually work great and the average guys do not account for it. It’s not a regular and widely accept way to go fast.
It tends to freak people out and keep them confused and assuming.
Thanks @Mattax for posting that. Such a simple and honest question has so many rules explaining stuff.I'm not saying that it's impossible to make hp with a low cr. The
Please explain the term Stock. Sounds like those 302 heads are a good way to go for better performance
This guy is insane!uh oh, looks like Matey Dan™ is back in port after his 3 1/2 seas voyage and was reading up while at sea!
IF, and only if, you already had some 302 heads that were done and ready to rock or found some at bargain basement prices and the rest of your build was budget oriented and designed around them, then sure, i'd run them with the caveats that: 1. i'm not racing, b. i'm not expecting world beating power and III. i didn't have another option that was basically free.Thanks @Mattax for posting that. Such a simple and honest question has so many rules explaining stuff.
Dan, I wouldn’t touch 302 heads if you paid me to run them. If you produce a 6 figure envelope, don’t expect me to campaign a season!
IF you want to increase the performance of any engine, but we will focus on the 318 for the moment specifically, I’ll tell you what I would do and that would be a set of Edelbrock heads. I’m not a big Speedmaster fan. BUT! If the work ($$$$$$) for you, go right ahead.
Screw J heads, to much work for a smaller payout than an aluminum head.
Like edelbrock headsIF, and only if, you already had some 302 heads that were done and ready to rock or found some at bargain basement prices and the rest of your build was budget oriented and designed around them, then sure, i'd run them with the caveats that: 1. i'm not racing, b. i'm not expecting world beating power and III. i didn't have another option that was basically free.
there's just so many other options that are objectively better that require basically zero specialist work and have the potential to make gobs more power.