440-1 flow numbers

-
Ootb, as in ZERO work with a grinder, non-cnc’d 440-1’s can be as bad as not quite 300cfm on my bench on a 4.375” bore.
They have come with the chambers cnc’d for several years now, but they didn’t always…….. and I’ve tested them prior to them having the chambers done where they didn’t break 300.

Another 440-1 “ism” for the as cast heads is the shape of the floor near the final approach into the bowl is slightly different between the four ports.
Also, how steep/abrupt the bowl cut is where it meets the ssr can result in fairly big differences in the ootb flow.

All that aside, they can all be in the 330+ range with very minimal work.
Imo, you’re not getting a very good return on your investment if you run these heads without some amount of porting/blending.

On my bench, as they come from Indy, cnc-325’s flow around 360 with a 2.19 valve, and the cnc-345’s are usually very close to 380 with a 2.25 valve.
 
Last edited:
The Trick Flow 240 has a 2.19 intake valve and I still do not know for sure if they are a different casting than the 270. Also I wonder what the minimum cross section is on the 240 head and if the gains of opening up to max wedge port size would be worth the effort. Of course, being able to do the work instead of paying for it makes everything more worthwhile from a cost versus benefit standpoint.
I believe they're the same casting from what I can tell, the 270 use the same rockers as the 240s.
I have never seen one in person to know if it has a stand off to raise the runner but I don't believe they do.
I have already done a gasket match blend on the ports to the Hughes gasket which did open the port a bit already. I know I wrote the original size down but I don't know where that note is.
The Hughes gasket has a cut out for max wedge so I will just port to that size.
Its not a true max wedge port though.
I have some really old nose mw gaskets that gobble up that 270 port window lol.
 
I think where Jeremiah was going was there'd be measurable gains just hogging the 240's open to MW area and using a MW intake. This too would make your 'small' cam seem bigger.
Oh Sean, your inbox is full.
 
I think where Jeremiah was going was there'd be measurable gains just hogging the 240's open to MW area and using a MW intake. This too would make your 'small' cam seem bigger.
I wonder if the 240's have enough metal in the right places to equal Indy SRs? A guy i know, and pitted next to, had a 499 with heavily ported SRs, ran an 8.37 at 2500 lbs with them.
 
I wonder if the 240's have enough metal in the right places to equal Indy SRs? A guy i know, and pitted next to, had a 499 with heavily ported SRs, ran an 8.37 at 2500 lbs with them.
Wow. I will be doing my best to find that out.
I can't imagine 290 ccs be undoable
 
-
Back
Top