I've spent waaaay more money on the rack then I've ever spent on any car....fact!!!!
I've spent waaaay more money on the rack then I've ever spent on any car....fact!!!!
Quote from the gtsregistry.com website:I am not sure what they called the 68 440 Darts......M code or what? They were made specifically for Landy and a couple of other teams and that was it. They would be worth a mint I am sure.
Just remember a talented builder WILL have all the numbers transferred from the original body to the rebody shell and it will damned near impossible to tell that it has been done. Scary....but true.
So now I'm going to make a point here. Let's say both racks are equally impressive with their cloths on but one of the two of them had some plastic surgery and other work. The other was a 100% natural beauty with everything she was born with. Which one would you pick. Me personally love born with body!Whilst on the subject, consider this:
Stay with the original imperfect old worn out body, or trade for the model that is all shiny and new and perfect......
I think the naill has been hit on the head a few times here!! For one, the car was too fresh on the block, and the resto done and then rushed to market may have hurt it some! More so tho, and this is just my opinion, when a car needs a lot of metal work, it diminishes the value exponentially!! I know there is good metal out there, and people are doing better than factory jobs on replacing that metal, but to me, when metal is replaced, I tend to shy away from the car more so than I would an original metal car! The more metal replaced, the less I become interested!
I have been actively looking to trade my all original metal GTX for a 70 Roadrunner, and came across this 44k original mile example near me! It was going to be a 3 car deal, he was going to trade me 3 cars for mine, but the RR needed every panel replaced from a bad storage situation, and the other cars (68 Cuda and 67 Coronet R/T) would not have paid for the resto! Not to mention that I would've gone from an all original metal car to a car with every panel replaced!! I really want a 70 RR, but not at what I consider a trade down for one!! Does that make sense??
View attachment 1715062790
View attachment 1715062791
View attachment 1715062792
[/QUOTE][QUOTE="cosgig, post: 1971731518, member: 7035"
In my personal endeavor to trade my GTX for a Roadrunner, I simply feel that I need to be apples to apples....your relatively clean and mostly unmolested 70 RR for my GTX in likewise condition!!
it is not that hard for anyone to take a 69 belvedere and make it into exactly what the mother mopar sent down the assembly line AS a 69 ROADRUNNER back in the day.???? right. and so back when the clone was born, or the t ribute car. basicalyt it was a way for th e flipper to make a car to sell at BJ for a quck buck. back in lets say the 80,s 90's when ifnding a decent 69 roadrunner complete decent project c ost you make $1000 1500 tops, why would anyone build a bogus belvedere into a relica runner!!!// generally NOT. maybe a few racer built a belvedere into a d rag car.What I find amazing is the credence some folks place in a build sheet or "window sticker". Remember if it was made once...it can and will be made again as long as the money warrants it.
And now we've come full circle.
Jim had two body shells. One was original but rooted, and one was perfectly placed to become the rebody.
He decided to cut up the second shell and use parts of it to repair the original shell with the addition of new AMD metal and a signature on a big check. And all because he has been brainwashed by the VIN Nazis.
That actually makes it a custom build.
No VIN swapped - no legal issues.
Well,
This thread is completely off topic of M-code 'Cuda values.
But now has everything to do with projecting ones personal opinion of what specifically interests them in the hobby onto everyone else.
But now has everything to do with projecting ones personal opinion of what specifically interests them in the hobby onto everyone else.
It started that way. Read the first sentence in this thread again. ;-)