No. Vaulting is indicative of going UP, not coming DOWN. lolSo if a ladder is a climbing or access tool, does it become a pole vault when you're falling off it?
No. Vaulting is indicative of going UP, not coming DOWN. lolSo if a ladder is a climbing or access tool, does it become a pole vault when you're falling off it?
Better than skank bolts.We call bolts with a part plain shank as bolts - or 'shank bolts'.
Fully threaded bolts are called 'set screws'.
Allen/Hex head socket screws are called 'cap screws'
a lot of newer (and european) workshop manuals make reference to cap screws as well. they don't differentiate on a lot of the fasteners in general either, just kinda all encompassing. i'm sure that some of it is lost in translation.THAT is an excellent explanation.
Ehrenberg also uses the term "Cap Screws".
Maybe he is just being facetious there?
A 9.30 1/8th would be a mid 14 second pass in the 1/4Isn't that kind of slow for a 1/8 mile race?
screws have the thread cut/rolled right up to the head, bolts have an unthreaded section between the head and the thread. so they are head 'bolts'. you never see them fully threaded as that would cost the factory more money/time.
THAT is an excellent explanation.
Ehrenberg also uses the term "Cap Screws".
Maybe he is just being facetious there?
During my machinist apprenticeship, we were taught that what makes up a bolt are two nuts that are threaded onto each end of a stud and a cap screw is a screw with a fixed head on one end and they can have full threads or partial threads....like a head bolt for example. The automotive field calls things differently.You could distinguish screws from bolts...
screws: internally driven
bolts: externally driven
My old Challenger ran 9.75's in the 1/8th. It wasn't fast but it was fun.A 9.30 1/8th would be a mid 14 second pass in the 1/4
During my machinist apprenticeship, we were taught that what makes up a bolt are two nuts that are threaded onto each end of a stud and a cap screw is a screw with a fixed head on one end and they can have full threads or partial threads....like a head bolt for example. The automotive field calls things differently.
My 66 Belvedere was the slowest car on the track on night but it was consistent and was cutting good and sometimes better than good lights. Went 7 rounds for the win....the fastest car in the brackets (only 1 bracket that night due to a poor turnout) cut the worse light he had all night and broke out to boot. His dial was 11.50 and mine was.....get this....19.66 lol. Going that slow isn't all that fun though but that night it wasWhat a wear out.
My old Challenger ran 9.75's in the 1/8th. It wasn't fast but it was fun.
View attachment 1716340841
I went 5 rounds one night with a bone stock 1987 5.0 Thunderbird. Skinny all season radials, and wire styled hubcaps. Lost when it spun out of the hole, I think it was dialed in around 10.9 seconds on an eighth mile track. Had a ton of fun with it, and never went further than 4 rounds with my Dart.My 66 Belvedere was the slowest car on the track on night but it was consistent and was cutting good and sometimes better than good lights. Went 7 rounds for the win....the fastest car in the brackets (only 1 bracket that night due to a poor turnout) cut the worse light he had all night and broke out to boot. His dial was 11.50 and mine was.....get this....19.66 lol. Going that slow isn't all that fun though but that night it was
Isn't that kind of slow for a 1/8 mile race?
I find myself wanting to call them gears but that dang Rick Ehrenberg wrote that gears mesh with other gears, sprockets are driven by chains.
He was a stickler for Mopar specific terminology.
Spindles? Nah...the factory called them Knuckles.
Drive shaft? No....Propeller shaft.
Clutch fan? No...Thermal drive fan.
There are others.
Posi = Sure Grip.
Z-bar = Torque Shaft.
Emergency brake = Parking Brake.
Can you recall any of the others?
I just remembered another one.
EVERYone I know calls them "Head Bolts".
Not him. He calls them screws because according to him, a bolt is retained by a nut, not just threads cut into a casting.
Bell housing screws?
Door hinge screws?
Intake manifold screws? Doesn't that all sound really weird?
I'll admit, I do agree with some of what you wrote. It is because of R.E. that I quit calling the part a spindle and started calling it a Knuckle.This is ironic…
It does sound weird!
But it is 100% technically correct. From the
Machinery's Handbook
“A bolt is an externally threaded fastener designed for insertion through holes in assembled parts, and is normally intended to be tightened or released by torquing a nut. A screw is an externally threaded fastener capable of being inserted into holes in assembled parts, of mating with a preformed internal thread or forming its own thread, and of being tightened or released by torquing the head”
Of course, Ehrenberg is also the kind of person that would boost his own ego by unnecessarily correcting people for using common terminology, even in cases where using the technical terminology is confusing and weird. He would also tell people they were putting their lives in danger riding in cars with green bearings too, and of course he never let go of the BS he posted about FMJ spindle usage in his disk brake article. Oh, sorry, FMJ upright. Oh, wait, knuckle.
But that’s Ehrenberg for you. Good thing no one here just goes around correcting people for using common terminology that everyone understands. That would be exhausting!
"the true value or quality of something can only be determined by experiencing it firsthand""The proof is in the pudding."
What? That makes no sense! Why would the proof be in the pudding?
That's because the saying is actually "The proof of the pudding is in the eating."
But that’s Ehrenberg for you. Good thing no one here just goes around correcting people for using common terminology that everyone understands. That would be exhausting!
I sincerely hope that the FIRST thing you did was to get rid of the 'sunroof'.This engine did have a loose chain although it was aftermarket.
Here is how the car looked when I got it...
View attachment 1716340067
The car was a real roach, so I nicknamed it that.
View attachment 1716340068
View attachment 1716340069
Maybe I am over thinking this, but isn't a timing chain being off by a tooth or two going to affect cam timing by enough to cause backfiring and miserable performance?Here we go....
This is not purely hypothetical.
Years ago I had a 318 in a Duster that was a S-L-U-G ! I tried all sorts of things to improve it but it was still slow. I pulled the timing cover to find that the cam sprocket and crank sprocket did not line up at the 6:00 firing position. With the crank at 12:00, the cam sprocket was off by at least one tooth.
Here is the question.....How much cam timing is in one tooth?
I realize that you just divide the number of teeth on the sprocket by 360 but which sprocket do you do the math from?
I don't remember the amount of teeth on either sprocket. I'm also curious if the number of teeth is always the same no matter who makes the timing set. It is always a 2 to 1 ratio though since the crank sprocket is 1/2 the size of the cam sprocket.
If the cam sprocket could be rotated ONE tooth to line up to the crank sprocket, that is one thing. In theory, that is 1/2 tooth of timing at the crank, right?
This would mean that the cam sprocket could be off 1/2 of crank timing per cam sprocket with a chart as follows:
1 @ cam = 1/2 crank
2 @ cam = 1 crank
3 @ cam = 1 1/2 crank, etc.
Back to the Duster 318. This was in 2008 and the memory is a bit fuzzy. It was off the mark enough that the engine ran smooth but was gutless no matter how much spark timing was put to it. I tried different intakes, carburetors, distributors and even uncorked the exhaust. Once I put a new timing set in it, (Installed correctly) the car was great. Before, it wouldn't peel out even on light gravel over hard packed dirt.
What say you? What amount of cam timing difference do you see per tooth ?