I am getting too low on parts.... I've given too much away already. Now "I" have "wanted" adds up .... go figureYou don't understand, he want's the heads to use in the MI project.. You won't be getting them back.
I am getting too low on parts.... I've given too much away already. Now "I" have "wanted" adds up .... go figureYou don't understand, he want's the heads to use in the MI project.. You won't be getting them back.
I like the 'teener port form better, & I'm definitely not above or against welding, but what does that have to do with the subject project?? Servedio/DV/Wood are not breakin' out the nickle rod or the spray welding ****, (DV prefers epoxy anyways), so this has turned into the same regurgitated pissin' match for like the 30th time.Better not show them the 318 heads I have with welded and raised roof with 2.02 valves.......
The usual cast will try to imply that they are some kind of exotic super stock heads now and are gonna cost 5k to replicate and don't even resemble a ported 302 head.I like the 'teener port form better, & I'm definitely not above or against welding, but what does that have to do with the subject project?? Servedio/DV/Wood are not breakin' out the nickle rod or the spray welding ****, (DV prefers epoxy anyways), so this has turned into the same regurgitated pissin' match for like the 30th time.
1) That did not address the questionThe usual cast will try to imply that they are some kind of exotic super stock heads now and are gonna cost 5k to replicate and don't even resemble a ported 302 head.
The quiky port flows what again.......
1) That did not address the question
2) It failed to refute My assertion.
Umm.........What did that QUICKY port flow again?All you’ll get is a whole load of buckshot.
Uhmm, the question, if You can follow.., is what does bringing up welded ports have to do with the MI heads?Which question? those implicit or explicit? Or better yet those that will no doubt arise out of the current direction this thread has taken.
What have you asserted? Or maybe inserted is more correct?
Someone who's looking to generate 28 pages of useless opinions on a website. ?Who in their right mind will spend that kind of time on connecting rods when you can buy a damn good rod with 7/16 cap screws, a better beam design and better material?
Someone who's looking to generate 28 pages of useless opinions on a website. ?
What does that have to with a tiny port that flows 220 cfm with a stock valve?Uhmm, the question, if You can follow.., is what does bringing up welded ports have to do with the MI heads?
I have asserted that bringing that into the conversation is simply to resume the now tiresome pissing match You've brought to every thread concerning this topic. As this is Your thread, it is Yours to piss in, but really You've almost reduced Yourself to a 10yr old shouting "SEE!!! SEE!!!"
Umm.........What did that QUICKY port flow again?
Quicky means quick doesn't it..........
What does that have to with a tiny port that flows 220 cfm with a stock valve?
And a decent head. OopsThat's funny both you guys have had name changes for bans i would imagine...........
Don't need you to do anything as my junk gets 11/32 Ferrea's with under cut stems so I know what happens when you go to a smaller valve stem. Last time I looked it was 2023 and why the hell would you bother using a 3/8 valve unless you cant afford a decent valve to start with.
I don't know about St Judes, but I think when they sell the engine, they should give the money to Charles.
By the looks of it, all he has is a flowbench, a die grinder, some old valve cutting stones and a can of marking dye.
Still.. all useless, when clicks are the mission, of this mission impossible.Way more FACTS in this thread than opinions.
Go back and read it. It was called early on there would be mission creep. FACT.
It was called early on that the MI build would be FAR more expensive with all the stupid limits put on it. FACT.
It was called early that UT would dump the project off on DV/AW and he would slide off into the mists of the internet and when it fails he will claim it wasn’t his plan. FACT. He’s already in hiding.
I could go on, but you get the point.
Unlike you I don't care.......Unlike you, I learned in the REAL world that flow is pretty low on the priority list for making power.
GM agrees with me.
Exactly......What does that have to with a tiny port that flows 220 cfm with a stock valve?
You mean that QUICKY port he can now duplicate for any customer he wants QUICKLY........The guy has a ton of time and effort for very little gain.
Unlike you I don't care.......
Ummm.......its 28 pages in and now you want to play forum god and moderator?Exactly......
I'll leave You & Your brain alone, so You can keep mentally circle-jerking in peace.
So could lots of people . But using that casting is the mission.I could EASILY make more power for less of all of the above.
So could lots of people . But using that casting is the mission.
I get that. But who in there right mind would give a **** what David Vizard starts with..............He must be spending your money.I get that. But who in their RIGHT mind would start with THAT casting when you don‘t need to?
If this was YOUR project would YOU with that casting?