Del is going on a 3000 dollar non-Mopar, non-vehicle, non-boat road trip

-
67Dart273

67Dart273

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
60,874
Reaction score
34,527
Location
Idaho
Tomorrow afternoon, after a doctor followup and lunch.

Details later

Hint:

It's old and 'Murican
It's yellow but it's not a cat or a case
It's not a vehicle or for a vehicle
It will NOT float and it's too big for an anchor, well, unless an aircraft carrier
It does require a trailer to haul it I think it's less than 1000 lbs
It will require some work and fabrication to get it where it will be operational
 
A world War 2 air raid Siren ??

20220609_191245.jpg


20220609_191257.jpg
 
LOL the neighbors would kill me if I showed up with either one
 
Well, just got home, got all the rolling stock moved and the trailer headed for under the hoist to unload. And yeh, I AM 3 grand poorer--less 200.00 for rebuilding one leaky cylinder

This is a Dual (Du-Al) 1015, later bought out and sold for decades by Woods as a BH750 and still sold by them with a modified main arm as I think a BH75

It's meant for 3 point, which my little Farmall doesn't have, and I'll make a sub frame to attach it, which will be stronger, anyhow. I just hope it "isn't too much" for the old Farmall, but it is not going to get beat much, either. I'll probably "mostly" leave the bucket off, and construct a small tube arm to replace it, using it to lift engines, outboards, etc. I'm hoping it will work better than the front loader, which is a pain. You are always slipping the clutch, and it's very hard to steer with much of a load on the front.

283144102_10221059106531935_7390404181488879769_n.jpg


283190736_10221059106891944_8810144068201846199_n.jpg


IMG_1522.JPG


IMG_1523.JPG
 
I was gonna say another Cletrac, but a Cletrac is more than 1000 lbs.
THAT looks like FUN! BE careful and enjoy!:thumbsup:
67Dart273 said:
Well, just got home, got all the rolling stock moved and the trailer headed for under the hoist to unload. And yeh, I AM 3 grand poorer--less 200.00 for rebuilding one leaky cylinder

This is a Dual (Du-Al) 1015, later bought out and sold for decades by Woods as a BH750 and still sold by them with a modified main arm as I think a BH75

It's meant for 3 point, which my little Farmall doesn't have, and I'll make a sub frame to attach it, which will be stronger, anyhow. I just hope it "isn't too much" for the old Farmall, but it is not going to get beat much, either. I'll probably "mostly" leave the bucket off, and construct a small tube arm to replace it, using it to lift engines, outboards, etc. I'm hoping it will work better than the front loader, which is a pain. You are always slipping the clutch, and it's very hard to steer with much of a load on the front.

View attachment 1715940234

View attachment 1715940235

View attachment 1715940236

View attachment 1715940237
Click to expand...

coloradohill said:
Do I win the prize? For being the closest???

View attachment 1715940266
Click to expand...
 
67Dart273 said:
Well, just got home, got all the rolling stock moved and the trailer headed for under the hoist to unload. And yeh, I AM 3 grand poorer--less 200.00 for rebuilding one leaky cylinder

This is a Dual (Du-Al) 1015, later bought out and sold for decades by Woods as a BH750 and still sold by them with a modified main arm as I think a BH75

It's meant for 3 point, which my little Farmall doesn't have, and I'll make a sub frame to attach it, which will be stronger, anyhow. I just hope it "isn't too much" for the old Farmall, but it is not going to get beat much, either. I'll probably "mostly" leave the bucket off, and construct a small tube arm to replace it, using it to lift engines, outboards, etc. I'm hoping it will work better than the front loader, which is a pain. You are always slipping the clutch, and it's very hard to steer with much of a load on the front.

View attachment 1715940234

View attachment 1715940235

View attachment 1715940236

View attachment 1715940237
Click to expand...
What in the world do you need with THAT? LOL
 
Hmmmm; nope not what I would have guessed! But I have been wrong before
 
67Dart273 said:
Well, just got home, got all the rolling stock moved and the trailer headed for under the hoist to unload. And yeh, I AM 3 grand poorer--less 200.00 for rebuilding one leaky cylinder

This is a Dual (Du-Al) 1015, later bought out and sold for decades by Woods as a BH750 and still sold by them with a modified main arm as I think a BH75

It's meant for 3 point, which my little Farmall doesn't have, and I'll make a sub frame to attach it, which will be stronger, anyhow. I just hope it "isn't too much" for the old Farmall, but it is not going to get beat much, either. I'll probably "mostly" leave the bucket off, and construct a small tube arm to replace it, using it to lift engines, outboards, etc. I'm hoping it will work better than the front loader, which is a pain. You are always slipping the clutch, and it's very hard to steer with much of a load on the front.

View attachment 1715940234

View attachment 1715940235

View attachment 1715940236

View attachment 1715940237
Click to expand...
OH MY!
I thought you were retired, why the hell do you need a machine to dig a trench. lol
Question is, what the hell will Del get involved with next? stay tuned! Summer is just beginning.:lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top