The sisters I know are not the Edelbrocks, there locals.That's exactly who I was referring to.
The sisters I know are not the Edelbrocks, there locals.That's exactly who I was referring to.
Your totally confusing me and now claiming to not know what your talking about but just simply being a parrot.I only repeated what I read here in the past, not claiming that figure myself
Is that the guy with zero data or anything at all to back up his claim, but continuously posts some forgotten engine competition from 2003? Yeah, one guy used it in a magazine....must be awesome lolThere is a member here with an engine masters contestant running that chink knock off and swears it’s great but has not swapped to a RPM to see how it does. IMO, just because it made great power doesn’t mean it’s the best intake for the job.
Choose accordingly, choose wisely!
Since in researching intakes, I have seen you drop that article 3 times, and quote the same guy every time you do, i figured i would read it.yep, I will jump in…if you think these very obviously smart, veteran engine master competitors left 30 horse on the table for at the time maybe 150 bucks…..not sure what to tell you
Iron-Headed Mopar 318 Magnum Engine- Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
Since in researching intakes, I have seen you drop that article 3 times, and quote the same guy every time you do, i figured i would read it.
Your 323 guys built a "neat" engine. Not one I would consider anywhere near the holy grail. Btw, the article is 16 years old. Anything first hand or relevent to post?
Its peak HP was at 4900 RPM. Is that good in someone's eye's??? And it had to wind to 6500 to make peak torque? What kind of curve is that? Those guys could have picked anything they wanted, and they choose iron magnum heads and a dual plane intake to chase numbers, then use 1.625 headers?
BTW, it placed about 13th out of 27 entrants (3 of which blew up on the dyno). Again. Neat...not amazing.
The fella has a nice engine with a history in a competition. The data can be looked up easy enough. The full build specs are out there. I have read them before. It’s a stout mill for sure & not one that you couldn’t copy and drive around. I personally think the intake should be changed for more HP but I wouldn’t badger anyone into that move.Is that the guy with zero data or anything at all to back up his claim, but continuously posts some forgotten engine competition from 2003? Yeah, one guy used it in a magazine....must be awesome lol
Thanks. This is how I see it on at least the larger engines. I’ve had them on 360’s, both intakes that is, the RPM & the chink knock off. In the future, if things work out as planned, I’ll dyno test them and a few others. The more choices we have the more blurrier the eyes become. I think there is a place for every intake for everyone. Then again, IMO, I think the chink knock off is made just to take a slice of the American pie and nothing else.I think your explanation is great. Works, yes. Best ever...ehhh.....it works lol
I think there is a confusion where the values/words were a slip up and crossed.4900 rpm peak horsepower, what?
made peak power at 6500, and appeared to still be pulling.
Still proving the build quality! Thumbs up!and you do realize those competitions are ran in a certain rpm range( 2500-6500 in this case) so the combo has to be built to suit that range.
As far as it being old.. everything about that build is still revelant today.
And I actually went down the track with that motor much more recently(6-7 years ago)
That it was and it running, it still is. It’s not a slouch for a 318 by any means. It’s also not a slouch next to other sized small blocks.So my comments are actually more to the point than anybody else that hasn’t done so in this thread.
And frankly, I could care less what you think about it. I haven’t heard of a more stout pump gas 318 since, have you? It was a bad *** little motor.
Agreesmaller the engine and the less power an engine makes the less it cares what intake is on top.
That’s nice. Looks great.
You don’t happen to remember the specs off hand do you?I would liked to have made couple passes in it with the original cam that was in it during enginemasters.
One that I used was a good bit smaller.
You don’t happen to remember the specs off hand do you?
I try to refrain from using Chinesium cheap crapola. It may bolt on and work fine. The problem is these cheap knockoffs undercut the companies that spent a pile of money on R&D to design and test a product. So purchasing the Chinesium leads to the companies we have trusted and relied on to go broke or move into the road apples condominium.Anyone have any experience with these cheap Edelbrock Air Gap Knockoffs that are on EBAY ?
I know it goes without saying that you get what you pay for but was just wondering if anyone has bolted one on ?
View attachment 1716102470
Even having product cast or manufactured in China to save on production costs is to a point self defeating. Any company you contract with or any partner you take up with to set up production in China is attached at the hip to the CCP. They have little to no respect for intellectual property rights, so will set up another company in a nearby city to produce a knockoff, copy or reverse engineered product to undersell you. You spend the money to design and develop a product which is expensive. Knocking out copies is very inexpensive, so they can underselk your product by a large amount and still made a substantial profit.Do you think the quality started to go down after Vic died?
You can't go wrong for $185Anyone tried one on a 273 4 barrel? It will be stock w/ mildly cleaned up ports on 920 heads, manifolds and a cam similar to the e4. 3.23 gears and a 2200-2400 stall. Choosing between one of these, or a stealth manifold
For the intake manifold from China?You can't go wrong for $185
Are they that cheap now ??For the intake manifold from China?
I asked you about this by quoting YOU and you’re asking me?You can't go wrong for $185
You can't go wrong for $185
For the intake manifold from China?
Are they that cheap now ??
Hence the knock off Air Gaps......Even having product cast or manufactured in China to save on production costs is to a point self defeating. Any company you contract with or any partner you take up with to set up production in China is attached at the hip to the CCP. They have little to no respect for intellectual property rights, so will set up another company in a nearby city to produce a knockoff, copy or reverse engineered product to undersell you. You spend the money to design and develop a product which is expensive. Knocking out copies is very inexpensive, so they can underselk your product by a large amount and still made a substantial profit.
About the same conversation starts at 1:23!