Well to say it cannot make power with low compression pisses all over the 73 340 and the 78 and 79 360 in the Lil Red express trucks. Those engines were far from slugs. Yall been readin WAY too many magazines and suckin the forum lollipops.
From what most say even the 10.5:1 340 was only 9.5:1 cause of tolerances, read a stock copy build/dyno of 375hp 440 magnum and they said factory pistons were way down the hole to, the cr was way bellow stated. Seem like many of these 60's engines were really never high cr to begin with wonder if Ford and Chev were similar.Well to say it cannot make power with low compression pisses all over the 73 340 and the 78 and 79 360 in the Lil Red express trucks. Those engines were far from slugs. Yall been readin WAY too many magazines and suckin the forum lollipops.
IMHO, he does not want to finish the engine as is. Your car is at a full service shop, so they should be qualified to:Problem is, I have the car sitting at a full service shop and it has been for 3 weeks. They are waiting on the engine to be finished to install as they are pulling the 318 and also changing the rear diff. Lots going on and at this point I just need this 360 ready.
@QUINN FORBES Yeah, he showed me the calculator he used to estimate the compression. He just feels that .100 is too far below deck and I'm letting go of a lot of quench using this set up. He wants to stroke it, basically changing all the internals. That's a wasted brand new cam, crank, rods and pistons. He says I definitely want a roller cam if the car isn't driven daily, because that cam will get bone dry and ruin lifters. I don't want to argue with this guy as he is a professional (at engine rebuilds and prostock racing), and I'm sure he doesn't need my business as his shop was full of engines waiting for rebuilds and ones already rebuilt. He just doesnt want to finish it as is because he says I'll be pretty unhappy with the performance. He is Alan Prusiensky of Arc Racing Engines so he's a Mopar guy.
Absolutely correct.From what most say even the 10.5:1 340 was only 9.5:1 cause of tolerances, read a stock copy build/dyno of 375hp 440 magnum and they said factory pistons were way down the hole to, the cr was way bellow stated. Seem like many of these 60's engines were really never high cr to begin with wonder if Ford and Chev were similar.
There's no FRAKKIN WAY they are in the hole .100" or more. NO WAY. I just figured it on the United Engine web site and the KB107 sits .012" in the hole with the stock 9.6 block, 6.123 connecting rod and the KB107's 1.675" compression height. Something is WRONG somewhere. If the piston really is in the hole that much, it's NOT a KB107.
It's in the hole...
It's in the hole...
How is ya Karl?
Really? Dangit. I've watched it several times trying to feel it, but I just caint get into it.Yeah Karl, really good to see you. Its been awhile. Miss your humor! By the way, one of my all time favorite movies.
Really? Dangit. I've watched it several times trying to feel it, but I just caint get into it.
KB-107 pistons have a 1.675" CH. With a stock block they should be no more than 0.012" below the deck surface. Who ever figured a 0.100" is way off.@QUINN FORBES Yeah, he showed me the calculator he used to estimate the compression. He just feels that .100 is too far below deck and I'm letting go of a lot of quench using this set up. He wants to stroke it, basically changing all the internals. That's a wasted brand new cam, crank, rods and pistons. He says I definitely want a roller cam if the car isn't driven daily, because that cam will get bone dry and ruin lifters. I don't want to argue with this guy as he is a professional (at engine rebuilds and prostock racing), and I'm sure he doesn't need my business as his shop was full of engines waiting for rebuilds and ones already rebuilt. He just doesnt want to finish it as is because he says I'll be pretty unhappy with the performance. He is Alan Prusiensky of Arc Racing Engines so he's a Mopar guy.
I used the NGK compression calculator and with kb107 pistons 0.012" below the deck and 68cc heads,0.039" thick headgasket with pistons having 5cc valve reliefs and a 4.030" bore stock stroke, I got a compression ratio of 9.90:1. I don't know how your machine shop came up with 8.0:1ok engine builders. Here is my dilemma. I bought a Mabbco rebuilt 360 short block from a member. Some upgraded stuff like KB high compression flat top pistons, moly rings, 272 muscle cam (272/272 duration 454-454 lift) Cloyes HD timing chain and sprokets. .30 over bore. Got a nice brand new set of Speedmaster aluminum heads with 68cc combustion chambers.
Here's the problem; my engine is at a builders for finishing. Went by there yesterday and he said this engine will be an absolute dog as it sits now. He doubts it will make 8:1 compression. Yes, the pistons are below deck a little, but he says I am losing a lot of quench with them. He suggests new pistons, rods, roller cam and new crank. That's an expensive prospect, considering what I already have in the motor. Also, this guy is a very well known builder with a great reputation and is well known in the racing circuit. His shop is incredible and he rebuilds engines for a living, and has many many great reviews. He does not even want to assemble the rest because he says he knows I will be disappointed.
What to do? Will this motor be a dog like he says? I don't know that I have the scratch to have him tear down this motor and upgrade it to a stroker.
TIA.
View attachment 1716094189
Read the thread and you will know.I used the NGK compression calculator and with kb107 pistons 0.012" below the deck and 68cc heads,0.039" thick headgasket with pistons having 5cc valve reliefs and a 4.030" bore stock stroke, I got a compression ratio of 9.90:1. I don't know how your machine shop came up with 8.0:1
@Dan the man , because it's been decided that they are not KB107's like I was told. They might be KB's, but they are a flat top piston and have no reliefs like the 107's. They are definitely sitting about .100 below deck. The above pic of the orange block is mine.I used the NGK compression calculator and with kb107 pistons 0.012" below the deck and 68cc heads,0.039" thick headgasket with pistons having 5cc valve reliefs and a 4.030" bore stock stroke, I got a compression ratio of 9.90:1. I don't know how your machine shop came up with 8.0:1
It's a bummer that you was miss lead about the pistons. 8.25:1-8 5:1 compression motor can be made to run good. Good luck with your project@Dan the man , because it's been decided that they are not KB107's like I was told. They might be KB's, but they are a flat top piston and have no reliefs like the 107's. They are definitely sitting about .100 below deck. The above pic of the orange block is mine.
My money says they are Silvolite stock replacement pistons.@Dan the man , because it's been decided that they are not KB107's like I was told. They might be KB's, but they are a flat top piston and have no reliefs like the 107's. They are definitely sitting about .100 below deck. The above pic of the orange block is mine.
Why would you return the heads?Well, I've returned the Speedmaster 68CC Heads and I am just going with a rebuild of the late 80's swirl port 714 heads that were on my 318. Anyone know the combustion chamber size of a stock pair of 714's?