Cruising around town 1400 -1600 is where i noticed throttle response was lazy.
How do you know it's cause of torque and not say something like overlap ?
Compare the 256 with the 268. and the 256 wouldn't make as much torque as a stock cam below 2000.
I don't know about that, possibly
I doubt the 256 would give up much it's got slightly more @ fifty duration, less advertised, similar lift, on a 110 lsa which should give better low end torque than 340's lsa.
But yes we don't have any dyno evidence down under 2000 rpm so it's a bit of guess work.
To me don't look like these much difference down low
doesn't show the diifference below that but it is even greater. I did have a stock 340 with the generic replacement
Melling 340 cam at .204 / .214 duration. That thing would pin you in your bucket seat at any low rpm and would break
the tires loose at low speeds as well. 3.23:1 gears
How much torque do you need at 1500-2000 rpm before it's. Not lazy ?
Say there's an amount eg. 300 lbs-ft does that mean a large displacement engine can never be lazy no matter the size the cam ?
Sure it's not the overlap the engine is not like running there?
How long does your car spend under 2000 rpm at full throttle ?
RPM Operating Range:1,000-5,200
Grind Number:XE256H
Cam Type:Hydraulic Flat Tappet
Lifter Style:Hydraulic Flat Tappet
Camshaft Series:Xtreme Energy
Usage:Street/Performance
California Proposition 65:WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm P65Warnings.ca.gov
Advertised Intake Duration:256
Advertised Exhaust Duration:268
Intake Duration at .050 Inch Lift:212
Exhaust Duration at .050 Inch Lift:218
Intake Valve Lift:0.447
Exhaust Valve Lift:0.455
Lobe Separation:110
If you look at this 360, @ 2500 the stock 2bbl cam makes about 330 lbs-ft and the xe256h & xe268h makes about 380 & 370 lbs-ft respectively a good 40-50 lbs-ft over stock cam, at 2000 rpm the stock 2bbl cam is still about 330 lbs-ft, the other aren't dyno'd down there so it's a guess but the dyno graph you provided didn't drop off there so I'd it safe to guess there still a positive gain possibly not.
I could be wrong and it's all about the torque especially since we got to guesstimate and piece together what's happening down there but I not seeing any overwhelming evidence saying so.
Graph starts at 9:45