1wild&crazyguy
Banned
So in 1970, all pedals for slant/318/340 were the same, right?
According to the 1970 Parts manual. All are the same number.
SWEET! thats all I care about.LOL
Thought I was losen my mind for a sec..:toothy10:
So in 1970, all pedals for slant/318/340 were the same, right?
According to the 1970 Parts manual. All are the same number.
Thanks for the info, good to know.
But I still have no idea what you are talking about with the statement in bold because I have a built 340 in front of it rev' 7 and have a built 410 stroker as well that shifted great 6500+rpm in front of the same rig.
I run no return spring either with about 1 1/2 of free travel before disengagement.
I still wonder if guys just tightened up the free play some at the fork rod, if that would fix this.
I believe all you say but the text in bold, cause my setup disproves that.
So I guess i'm letting you know that it works awesome.
Wild & Crazy: You have the same clutch setup as my matching number 1970 340 Duster. If you look at the parts manuals you will see that ALL 1970 Dusters had clutch pedal part number 3467082. In 1971, the Dusters EXCEPT the 340 also had part number 3467082. But the 1971- 340 had part number 3467987. This is why Oldmanmopar's picture of his 71 340 setup is different looking (for the 340) than ours. But what he is saying is the 318 is actually all the same for 1970. Hope this clears this up a bit.
l. If yours works so well than whats the worry.There are some having problems with geometry mismatching parts making 4spd cars.This artical is all about making it easier to shift at high rpms. But if your motor don't go up there you have nothing to worry about. And if you can shift it with a 5 1/4 throw at over 7000 , you are the man. I personally twist the livin **** out of everything I own. And it works for me. I also noticed its alot easier going in gear , also down shifting and reverse. It works for me. And I don't think Herb McCandless would would say it , if it wasn't true.Right, cool.
it's the 5 1/4 vs 6'' that I laugh at.
my 5 1/4 spread works great and has no clutching issues, so I doubt the shifting issues the mag reports.
Im done on this, thats all I wanted to confirm, for that was my point.
l. If yours works so well than whats the worry.There are some having problems with geometry mismatching parts making 4spd cars.This artical is all about making it easier to shift at high rpms. But if your motor don't go up there you have nothing to worry about. And if you can shift it with a 5 1/4 throw at over 7000 , you are the man. I personally twist the livin **** out of everything I own. And it works for me. I also noticed its alot easier going in gear , also down shifting and reverse. It works for me. And I don't think Herb McCandless would would say it , if it wasn't true.
67valiant 100, are yours from a 340 car or ?
Sounds like you have another example.
The article can say all it wants...but whats it worth?
They are not mopar or the ones who built these originally.
We know how certain plants did things differently and that mag articles can contradict each other, or try and fill the blanks with incorrect 'majority seen' info.
What a magazines says does not change whats in front of my own eyes.
67valiant 100, are yours from a 340 car or ?
Sounds like you have another example.
l. If yours works so well than whats the worry.
ok what is that welded bracket all about?? is that original? only reasonm i ask is because the pedal set up i put in my dart has the same thing. i just thought someone tried to stiffen things up over the years...
Dont believe everything you read...
..and dont beat horses when they're already dead.
I have a somewhat related question....
I am putting together a 4 speed pedal assembly from a box of parts. How is this sub-assembly supposed to behave when not installed in the car? Specifically, what I'm talking about is the function of the over-center spring. I thought that as I would move the clutch pedal down and up, that the spring would try to bias the pedal into either of these end locations. What I'm finding is that the spring wants to pull the pedal down, and if I pull the pedal up it is extremly unstable like a mouse trap (and a hell of a lot more dangerous!). Also, the spring pulls the pedal down such that it's bending the start depression switch bracket.
Have I done something totally stupid, or overlooked something simple? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.