MOPAROFFICIAL
If it has tits, it's a liability.
Lead will smear , fishing weights hence the 'fishy af' in my last post.Lead shot?
Lead will smear , fishing weights hence the 'fishy af' in my last post.Lead shot?
Lead will smear , fishing weights hence the 'fishy af' in my last post.
Did it even rotate after assembly, probably not... but the 4.1 mopar starter dont care..
Lead Foot and High Exhaust temps contributing factors. Lol . .
Fun looking it over and figuring it all out. Good case study.
Do you all think its bearing material?
That crank journal should be destroyed if that was the case.imo
Who put it together, that is the question I wanna know. Measure the crank and see if the bearings are even matched.
Muat'a been a loose std someone put a .010 under bearing into to do this kinda damage .
"Motor ran great till one day"
Fishy AF. Imo
Well, the good news is the machine shop didn’t seem very concerned about the crank, or the cylinder walls. Sounds like a honing will do for the cylinders, and he’s going to measure the journals and get back to me. His guess was that the material on the crank is Babbit. I didn’t get to pulling the cam before dropping it off, the shop is gonna do that and check the bearings there.
It’s funny, first thing he said was “Wow! Never seen THAT before!!”
At first that seemed plausible, but there is just too much of it. And I too have never seen a bad bearing without crank damage. The color of the material is exactly that of solder or fresh cut lead, and the shape of the globules in the crankcase is exactly how solder blobs up; either would be soft enough to not score the crank. Maybe some clown put solder or lead behind a bearing shell LOLDo you all think its bearing material?
That crank journal should be destroyed if that was the case.imo
Who put it together, that is the question I wanna know. Measure the crank and see if the bearings are even matched.
Muat'a been a loose std someone put a .010 under bearing into to do this kinda damage .
"Motor ran great till one day"
Fishy AF. Imo
Lead Foot and High Exhaust temps contributing factors. Lol . .
Fun looking it over and figuring it all out. Good case study.
The material in the cylinders is magnetic because it is from the crushed steel valve seat.Just one seat fell out - the #3 exhuast. Funny thing is, the pieces of the seat that were in the cylinders were magnetic. This material around the crank isn't magnetic. Most is very, very tiny and spherical. Like grit. I'll post up some pics of all the bearings and such a little later. The driver side head was all pretty burned up looking, especially around the #3 and #5 valves. I'm guessing due to the missing seat? Passenger side head looked near new.
View attachment 1715389394 View attachment 1715389395 Here are the bearings
Ya know.... that makes sense if the crank kept running and running and running. I realize that the only bearing failures I've seen are oil starvation, and the only piston impacts were violent enough to stop the engine dead in its tracks or bend the rod. If the seat shattrered at the first blow, then those smaller impacts might indeed just heat the lower main bearing and the #3 rod bearing and slowly melt the materials out. Makin' more sense....Yep that will do 'er in.
It's called Malleability, reshaping bearing inserts at room temperature by hammering on them.
That crank had no where else to go being being the pistons were bottomed out against the valve seat pieces at TDC, so the soft crank bearing inserts took the brunt of the rotating force. Enough so the piston could go past TDC and come around again for another wack, with crank taking the same beating on every rotation. Bearings not only had the pressure on them, but the rotational force under pressure too. On and on until the owner finally turned off the key.
Dynamite, Bing, Bang, Ka-Boom
Down and Out . . .
When you see and read weird **** like this sometimes I don't know if my ideas are worth a squat, to be honest.Yeah but lead shot isn't really lead anymore, just like fishing weights. That said fishing weights are way more likely to be on hand for many people than lead shot... Your idea makes more sense.
When you see and read weird **** like this sometimes I don't know if my ideas are worth a squat, to be honest.
I was saying my idea could be wrong.Sorry... what?
If you're gonna lob one across the bow, at least be direct. how was the admission of fishing weights, which aren't "just lead" anymore, being more likely than "lead shot" from a shotgun shell, which also aren't really "just lead" anymore, "weird ****"?
I was saying my idea could be wrong.