Like Brian said about chamber clearance that can be accomplished somewhat during the valve job. Lay out your gasket size and have them run a 15 degree cutter down the chamber wall.
Will do. My apologies to Brian. I was thinking about hand blending, not the valve job.Like Brian said about chamber clearance that can be accomplished somewhat during the valve job. Lay out your gasket size and have them run a 15 degree cutter down the chamber wall.
Will do. My apologies to Brian. I was thinking about hand blending, not the valve job.
I think Post 75 demonstrates that, on these heads in particular, the as cast SSR form becomes an area that holds back the progress early on…….which is why I start tweaking it pretty early in the porting process.
That’s not to say that some of the “area” enhancements couldn’t be worth some amount of power on a stroker bracket race type combo(even if they showed next to nothing on the bench).
But if I’m doing a budget oriented porting job, I’ll spend some time on the SSR before spending much time on the PRP or head bolt bulge.
It wouldn't be a bad idea for you fellas to discus and form a list of porting areas to do from first to last. (or us street guys that just want to tune up a set of heads but don't need or can use maximum flow for big horsepower)I think Post 75 demonstrates that, on these heads in particular, the as cast SSR form becomes an area that holds back the progress early on…….which is why I start tweaking it pretty early in the porting process.
That’s not to say that some of the “area” enhancements couldn’t be worth some amount of power on a stroker bracket race type combo(even if they showed next to nothing on the bench).
But if I’m doing a budget oriented porting job, I’ll spend some time on the SSR before spending much time on the PRP or head bolt bulge.
I’ll leave you guys to it.You guys aren’t picking up on what this post is all about at all.
It wouldn't be a bad idea for you fellas to discus and form a list of porting areas to do from first to last. (or us street guys that just want to tune up a set of heads but don't need or can use maximum flow for big horsepower)
I’ll leave you guys to it.
It’ll be interesting to see how it unfolds without addressing the SSR, and how the flow numbers shake out.I love your input but the average guy is deathly afraid of the short turn. All in all for this type of head it’s not bad but to hit the 30ish target cfm gain we are going to lose 80% of the guys that are brave enough to grab a grinder. Going up is safe but that only gets you so far. It needs widening bigtime and yes lowering
Hopefully tomorrow morning I can widen the chamber out to the bore or gasket line to reduce some shrouding. This will be done with a 15 degree top cut as part of the valve job. This is what Brian suggested and it went right over my head. We'll let PBR direct us after that.What would be the next move ? Opening the throat percentage ?
Hopefully tomorrow morning I can widen the chamber out to the bore or gasket line to reduce some shrouding. This will be done with a 15 degree top cut as part of the valve job. This is what Brian suggested and it went right over my head. We'll let PBR direct us after that.
From my experience, just working the chamber and nothing else on a set of Edelbrocks that are on my daughters 340, the flow pickup is really good.Dude you have to work the chamber wall, especially when you go to a larger valve! The pinch won't show you anything until you unlock seat area (bottom of the valve job to the deck).
Do you think opening the throat to 90-91% of the valve would help ?These damn parking brakes on my 3/4 ton dodge are fighting me hard. If I get a chance tomorrow I’ll try to sonic check my thickness of material left at my bolt hole and then measure across the shortside. Sooner or later your going to have to address that ugly bulge.
Good question. I have never tried that on the bench. I believe conventional wisdom would say leave it sharp on the intake for a fuel shear ridge and round it on the exhaust to give exhaust the best chance to escape. I bet leaving it sharp on the intake would help fight reversion as well. Hopefully others will address this.Cool thread! I like seeing the incremental gains from each step. Do you think blending the top cut into the chamber would be worth anything?
View attachment 1716265719
That has not been my experience on this head. I have had the best luck at 88%. But throat size does not exist in a vacuum by itself. What’s going on in the bowl, what’s going on in the chamber, where are you trying to direct the air, fighting reversion on the short side all play a part. I personally think valve lift plays a part. Others do not agree.Do you think opening the throat to 90-91% of the valve would help ?
Do you think opening the throat to 90-91% of the valve would help ?