junkyardhero
Well-Known Member
especially with chevy rods and pistons!They work pretty good in race cars too.
especially with chevy rods and pistons!They work pretty good in race cars too.
Cause your reply to Junkyardhero's answer to YOUR question seems a little condescending.No. Why you ask something so silly
Not even close to the grunt of a big block, not even the lowly 383. lolmy '72 D200 has a factory 360. They work well in that application, tons of grunt and has the driving feel of a big block.
My badCause your reply to Junkyardhero's answer to YOUR question seems a little condescending.
Not even close to the grunt of a big block, not even the lowly 383. lol
The worst thing Mopar ever did is to put a low compression 360 in a 5000# truck
You really don't want to go there. lolThat’s the only thing a 383 is good for. A 5000 pound truck. Lol and it wouldn’t be my first three choices for that job.
yes they are. very underratedThey work pretty good in race cars too.
Not even close to the grunt of a big block, not even the lowly 383. lol
The worst thing Mopar ever did is to put a low compression 360 in a 5000# truck
Ok back on topic here how'd we go from re-casting 340 blocks to talking about the "dog" 383
How many pages can just be said only about re-casting 340's.Ok back on topic here how'd we go from re-casting 340 blocks to talking about the "dog" 383
What's wrong with a 383? You like only hemis?Those 383 blocks would be sitting right along side 318 blocks on my scrap pile. Lol
Think the OP was talking about a relatively cheap re-placement block for average 340 builds.I'm just curious (and didn't read back) What's wrong with the ritter blocks? isn't that as good as a 340 block?
360 vs 383What's wrong with a 383? You like only hemis?
That what was the sentiment of most of the replies.Having someone cast a new 340 block would literally cost the same as a ritter block... the engineering/casting/material would end up in the same ballpark.. Or at least close enough to the ballpark to make using a stock type block kinda silly..
sorry, that's why i deleted that comment.. i was sure someone had brought it up beforeThat what was the sentiment of most of the replies.
Nothing wrong with stating it againsorry, that's why i deleted that comment.. i was sure someone had brought it up before
This stuff has been hashed over a hundred times any way.Nothing wrong with stating it again
If it's for weight, someone is an idiot. Yep, swiss cheese your drive gear for another .0030 of a horsepower.So.. i was just looking up ritter info cause i don't know much bout them (seems they used to have bad issues..) i found this pic and anyone know why the dist drive gear would be all drilled out like this? inertia and weight? although it's a pretty small gear to start with..
View attachment 1716247273
The guy replied below it (i looked after posting here of course) said it removed over an ounce from the gear and also let more oil into the bushing area and he wasn't driving the oil pump so no real pressure on the gear.If it's for weight, someone is an idiot. Yep, swiss cheese your drive gear for another .0030 of a horsepower.
I hope he makes the money back eventually and stays around.. i will never have need of a block like that but it would be coolThe volume would be the problem.
I was at Ritter's place 3 or 4 years ago, at that time he told me was into his block program for $250k and I know they went through a 3rd revision after that. So he has easily sunk $300k in the project.
The problems are largely resolved now.
Last time I was down at Harshman's dropping my stuff off, there was about 6 or 7 of them sitting there in the que.I hope he makes the money back eventually and stays around.. i will never have need of a block like that but it would be cool
Last time I was down at Harshman's dropping my stuff off, there was about 6 or 7 of them sitting there in the que.