RPM! No brainer!
My least choice of the three would be the streetmaster. Cast 340 or SM intake, depends on which look you like, and if you do a lot of start ups in cold weather.Having just reading this thread had to open up the box my manifold came in, which I purchased during the black Sunday sales. Looks good seems to fit well during a dry test fit, don’t relish the plugs used to cover up the bolt holes. The casting shift seems to be a minimal no worst then the engine it sits on.
But I am in a split here, to use this manifold or the Edelbrock Streetmaster or even my cast iron manifold I took off my 70 340. Stock heads, with some porting done, with a Mellings SPD22 cam and lifter kit. A stock 1972 318 block 30 over bore, like to stay in the 1200 to 5000 range for my power needs. Out of the three manifolds which one would be best for my build?
View attachment 1715645418
View attachment 1715645419
Yeah that's a dilemma. Is it the 318 streetmaster? I know that has smaller runners but so do your heads if they're the factory 318 heads. It's likely coming out of that Speedmaster intake the air and fuel theoretically hit the wall...Having just reading this thread had to open up the box my manifold came in, which I purchased during the black Sunday sales. Looks good seems to fit well during a dry test fit, don’t relish the plugs used to cover up the bolt holes. The casting shift seems to be a minimal no worst then the engine it sits on.
But I am in a split here, to use this manifold or the Edelbrock Streetmaster or even my cast iron manifold I took off my 70 340. Stock heads, with some porting done, with a Mellings SPD22 cam and lifter kit. A stock 1972 318 block 30 over bore, like to stay in the 1200 to 5000 range for my power needs. Out of the three manifolds which one would be best for my build?
View attachment 1715645418
View attachment 1715645419
You are correct on the title. Yet you are injecting what? Newly joined doesnt mean new to anything else. And yes i do own one of these intakes. Maybe thats why i was reading the thread? First i thought maybe you were not up to par on your knowledge of Fords. The more i hear from you im thinking you are just an arrogant dumbass who thinks hes cool. One thing for sure. You claim to have ford knowledge. And you say 351C is junk. You are stupid AF. I own a few of those also. They are a force to be recond with. Now if you dont mind, ive got more important things to do.Check this out newbie... This thread is about a Speedmaster mid-rise intake manifold read the title. Do you have one? I do...
Rusty and I go way back on this forum and we give each other s*** every so often and you would know that if you weren't new. He knows when he interjects Ford talk he's stirring the pot. but he's also aware that I have appreciation for all cars..
with that said I'm three-quarters of the way through a 63 Ford Fairlane 500 total rotisserie restoration and starting a 72 Ford highboy restoration currently. I help people restore their nostalgic vehicles for a living... Just two of many clients..
I have said talked about manifold that this thread is about. If you want to start another thread about Ford intakes I'll be glad to talk to you about them...
View attachment 1715644154
First and foremost the Speedmaster mid-rise intake makes it terrible foot stool as it hurts the bottom of my heel...
you don't comprehend very well I told you I was just giving one of the other members that I've known for years a little s***..You are correct on the title. Yet you are injecting what? Newly joined doesnt mean new to anything else. And yes i do own one of these intakes. Maybe thats why i was reading the thread? First i thought maybe you were not up to par on your knowledge of Fords. The more i hear from you im thinking you are just an arrogant dumbass who thinks hes cool. One thing for sure. You claim to have ford knowledge. And you say 351C is junk. You are stupid AF. I own a few of those also. They are a force to be recond with. Now if you dont mind, ive got more important things to do.
I've never heard of anybody using the front or rear China Wall gasket...I got one of these intakes second hand. The guy i got it from has a dart he drag races. Dont know for how long but he did have it running with it. There is slight carbon buildup starting at egr port. Can also see where he ground out on a couple bolt holes. Other than that it looks out of the box. Not sure why but some reason he took this off and replaced it with edlebrock air gap. And sold to me for 40.00
Im attempting to put it on a 76 360. Shouldnt be any modification to this engine . the truck only has 15000 miles on it. But when i sat the intake on it it doesnt seem to fit. To start i had only drivers side valve cover removed. Thought it might have been the other valve cover holding me up. Removed the other vc. Now it looks better but still doesnt look good. After inserting a screwdriver in holes to line it up the holes appear to all line up. Ive got 5 bolts threaded in part way. Seems to be sitting on the end seals but can easily put feeler gauge between intake and head. With as thick as the end seals are maybe it will seal when torqued. I sould have had this figured out already. But i missplaced the new bolts. And when i was working on it my fingers got cold and i said F it. Knowing it was a china knock off i question the casting. The ports seemed to line up very good using the gasket. The rear edge of intake almost hits the distributor hold down.
Sometimes i use end gaskets sometimes not. Ive seen issues both ways. I try to avoid any cork gasket. Never had a problem with rubber end seals. Not sure if ive seen them for a small block chrysler. I work on all makes and models. Have seen with rtv if not careful placing intake. If it doesnt go on perfect and even the rtv gets squished out leaving a big void. Have also seen many many times an engine that was destroyed by rtv. Too much used and sucked up into oil or water pump plugging up passages. Im a certified master tech. Have installed many gaskets on many kinds of vehicles for many years. Seldom have any problems. This intake is not what i would call ideal for the application. But the factory 2 barrel isnt either. Thats junk. I dont want it to fall on its face every time i push the accelerator. Nowadays everyone wants a fortune for everything. I would have preferred a regular dual plane intake for my 76 W300 with 15000 miles . i would have preferred it had a 440 instead of a 360 also. But for now a decent carb will do. Its got dana 70 rear and dana 60 front and 4spd with a 20000 lb pto winch and an extra pto . in future maybe it'll get a big block? Was mainly wondering if anyone has had problems with this intake other than port alighment. This one seems right on the money for that. The rear of it could use some grinding. And likely will. I was trying to put this together as quickly as i could due to the weather and having other things to do. So tried cutting corners. Hence leaving one valve cover installed. Also didnt want to mess with removing the mammoth 300A alternator which is where the AC pump usually is. Thats why i tried the cork end gaskets. Getting the intake on square and even in one motion would be a feat. Looked way off with vc on. After removing it looks much better. Found my new bolts. So ill pull it back off. Apply some fresh rtv in the corners. Then torque it down. Probaby take a die grinder in the distributor area too. If that doesnt work ill just have to get everything out of the way and see whats up.I always recommend test fitting intakes without the end seals before bolting it down for final assembly. I never personally use those Gaskets but I will take feeler gauges and see how high I have to Dam it with black silicone. With an intake like these I then check my bolt alignment and snake a camera down the runners to check port alignment.
I should have added when I do my test fitting I have a nice heavy duty black magic marker that I trace a “cheater-line” on the front dam of the block. Kinda gives me a nice target line to line things up instead of bolt holes that you can’t see till you get it almost in place.
Not hardly anything made here anymore. And they dont have to do much of anything to claim made in usa. Many times they just assemble it here. Or i got a scoup shovel that had a big sticker and a tag claiming made in usa turned it over and was stamped china. Called the manufacturer and asked about it. They hung up on me like 4 times. Finally i was told they assemble them in Texas. Then he said " and i think maybe they make the handle. " . so maybe make the handle.... With an automated machine. Probably a machine assembling them too. So no jobs. So edlebrock likely has them cast in china then sent here for cnc to finish it. From looks of the speedmaster i aquired id say china just skips that step.Yes, and as much as people just love to brag about Edelbrock being "MADE IN USA", IMO that's become the issue. They are NOT any longer. Edelbrock's quality has been slipping a long time and it coincides directly with the industry outsourcing timeline. That's not a coincidence. I don't know what the law says there, but I believe only a "part" of a company's products have to be made here in order for them to make that claim. So for example, if Edelbrock is using an offshore foundry for instance and having their final machining process finished here, then there you go. The port misalignment on some of these intakes is disgraceful workmanship. For Mopar guys, that's doubly so, because all our Edelbrock intakes START at about $300 and go UP, so we're paying a premium for craptastic parts. They aren't gettin my money. I'll make do with 30 plus year old parts that I know are cast RIGHT before I take a chance on something inferior. Remember the old adage "new doesn't mean good".
This is completely 100% incorrect.So edlebrock likely has them cast in china then sent here for cnc to finish it.
most the edelbrock **** I've bought has been good . The shop i go to has bought edelbrock heads and intakes for years and most parts have been good very few returns . They sure put enough made in USA STICKERS and statements on the boxes .Unless they are faking all the videos I believe they are made in the USThis is completely 100% incorrect.
The heads are cast in California.
Beats me. But i thought were talking about intakes? Either way give em some time. Everything else goes to china. I dont think any bearings are made anywhere but china. I couldnt find any. Think timken was last to go. Probably doesnt matter much for quality. Seems nobody cares about making quality anymore. Besides if we dont get these screwy politicians straightened out we might not have a country.This is completely 100% incorrect.
The heads are cast in California.
This is completely 100% incorrect.
The heads are cast in California.
all I can say is , wow that is nice ! you can do a remake of emergency , calling squad 51
I've got a 440 in a 79 Coachman motor home. I think the exhaust manifolds and oil pan on it would work. I'd probably have to get a flywheel and a bell housing. And if i was going to do all that id want to get new pistons and .maybe heads. It is a low compression engine.nice truck you're building the 440 swap is easy , did one on a 77 w-150 , made a huge difference . good luck with your truck post a pic or 2 , just love them old Dodge truck. I'm looking to buy one f i can find one with a decent body and frame
Ford junk...