I see that. And the first image might not be a photo.
Stop in for a cup of coffee
- Thread starter toolmanmike
- Start date
-
Here's an original 66 D Dart engine photo. Note no Corbin clamps.
Maybe engine family too.
?
Really wish amie verrier was on fabo, that man is a wealth of information. A stickler for even the smallest details.
Slightly arrogant, but i think he earned the right. Has been rebuilding mopars most of his life. His collection is impressive. Havent seen him in 3 or 4 years though.
Slightly arrogant, but i think he earned the right. Has been rebuilding mopars most of his life. His collection is impressive. Havent seen him in 3 or 4 years though.
Both yes and no. Mentally yes, but there are some practical thing she is waiting for that will take until next year late summer. Then it should be resolved, and nothing of that kind holding us back. I was ready 6 years ago.
Bill
Note to self:
When a larger hammer is needed, go get it. Small hammer means bigger swing with less accuracy. Now my thumb needs a patch...
When a larger hammer is needed, go get it. Small hammer means bigger swing with less accuracy. Now my thumb needs a patch...
I wonder how I can take digital black and white pictures, both with my camera and my phone. Wish it was possible.
Bill
Bill
Ouch!
Might be a setting or app..
oh yeah, I knew a guy who had a large chisel, and a sledgehammer? (looks like a sledge, small enough to be used with one hand) and he could not focus on both the end of the chisel and the other end where he would hit with the hammer. He tried and tried, and finally gave up and only focused where he placed the chisel, and put the end of the thumb on the end of the chisel, and gave it a good go with the sledgehammer. I don't know if his thumb ever got 100% right again. Be careful with the tools.
Bill
So DDart had headers? It looks like the one in the photo does...
Scott Smith Harms knows a lot of these details. But only posts on Moparts AFAIK.
Searching there, he shows this as an original '71 340 filter and line.
But much later than we're talking about
I think so. or they came in the trunk
Sweet!
Love to have a set of those!
Yes they did.
He's a smart guy for sure.
None were chrome.
Can someone please identify what these will fit, if it is possible to see that through the bag and so forth.
They are supposed to be brush holders for some kind of Chrysler alternators, but which type is it ?
Bill
They are supposed to be brush holders for some kind of Chrysler alternators, but which type is it ?
Bill
dukeboy440
Well-Known Member
yeah, in theory. I say in theory because we've seen how Ma Mopar actually handled those production dates. Its been proven that often times, it was inventory on hand more than it was production dates
What kind of coating was it ? I mean all the ones I see that looks a bit like this filter seems to be chrome.
Bill
Probably nickel
1964-1966 Mustang Single-Speed Windshield Washer Pump, Exact Reproduction | eBay
This washer pump is for a Mustang, but looks to me as the same as the Mopar one or at least close. I don't have one of each in my hand to compare. The only thing I see is that the Mustang one is around $35, while the Mopar ones are sold for $70-80.
Any thoughts ?
Bill
This washer pump is for a Mustang, but looks to me as the same as the Mopar one or at least close. I don't have one of each in my hand to compare. The only thing I see is that the Mustang one is around $35, while the Mopar ones are sold for $70-80.
Any thoughts ?
Bill
-
