72 Dart Swinger 3.6L Pentastar +T5

-
Nice build thread!

That’s a Gen 1 Sprintex Blower?

I’d like to SuperCharge my 2013 3.6 Avenger. I’m hearing Gen 2 Sprintex is suitable for that application, is there tuning available?

And I have a ProCharged 2007 Dodge Ram with the old school UniChip tuning.
Can you assist in a Tune for this application using Diablo as ProCharger won’t sell me a base tune.
Thank you
 
Nice build thread!

That’s a Gen 1 Sprintex Blower?

I’d like to SuperCharge my 2013 3.6 Avenger. I’m hearing Gen 2 Sprintex is suitable for that application, is there tuning available?

And I have a ProCharged 2007 Dodge Ram with the old school UniChip tuning.
Can you assist in a Tune for this application using Diablo as ProCharger won’t sell me a base tune.
Thank you

Sprintex is sold in favor of an Edelbrock

Sure I can tune it no problem. I can sell you a DiabloSport i3 and a Full Custom tune for the Ram
https://www.needlesstorque.com/product.html

Contact me from my website and well discuss the details
Contact


upload_2021-4-2_23-50-38.png
 

That's awesome but this bit is 100% Fake News:

"its tight packaging makes this virile V6 ripe for restomods; a 60-degree cylinder arrangement and integral exhaust manifolds shave excess width for plentiful piping and steering clearances"

The truth is that Valve cover to Valve cover, the 3.6l is as wide as a 440.
The exhaust outlet dumps exactly in the narrowest section of an Abody's engine bay and right onto the steering column. Routing exhaust out and around the steering column was a huge pain.
 
Last edited:
And it says the V6 makes as much hp as a "ticked off 340". A "ticked off 340" makes way more than a 3.6, IMO
 
And it says the V6 makes as much hp as a "ticked off 340". A "ticked off 340" makes way more than a 3.6, IMO
imo "ticked off" = Cam and headers

A stock 72 340 was only 245hp net. The stock 3.6l has over 50hp more net hp.

So take a stock 72 340 + Cam and headers to add 50hp and you're at a bone stock 3.6L net Hp

My stock 3.6l Dart ran the 1/4 in ~14.3 @99mph(w/ a terrible 2.2 60ft)
A Good 1/2 second and 5mph faster then a brand new 100% stock 72 340 Duster ran back then(14.9 @94mph)
So again, add Cam and headers to the 340 and the 1/4 time/mph would be similar.
 
imo "ticked off" = Cam and headers.......So take a stock 72 340 + Cam and headers to add 50hp and you're at a bone stock 3.6L net Hp ..... 100% stock 72 340 Duster ran back then(14.9 @94mph)

What's 50 hp going to decrease that time by? .5 seconds? Maybe. Still 14.00+ in the 1/4.
"Ticked off" is so subjective but let's keep it real. A 50 horsepower increase over a dismal stock production figure isn't impressive enough for most people to come to that conclusion, unless you have bias.
I love that you have figured out the electronics on your 3.6. Most impressive. The weight reduction is probably the most appealing thing since the power numbers aren't but a slight increase over the "fake" stock 340 numbers.
Keep in mind the factory numbers on the performance cars like 340 equipped units were intentionally held back for insurance purposes. For example, a T/A 340 6 bbl was rated at 290 horsepower from the factory. JBA Speedshop (JBA Headers) had a, rebuilt to stock spec, T/A engine on their dyno and it made 358 hp and 347 lb/ft with a tune up.
Now, add some boost to that thing to make it go from "Neat" to "Wow"!
 
What's 50 hp going to decrease that time by? .5 seconds? Maybe. Still 14.00+ in the 1/4.
"Ticked off" is so subjective but let's keep it real. A 50 horsepower increase over a dismal stock production figure isn't impressive enough for most people to come to that conclusion, unless you have bias.
I love that you have figured out the electronics on your 3.6. Most impressive. The weight reduction is probably the most appealing thing since the power numbers aren't but a slight increase over the "fake" stock 340 numbers.
Keep in mind the factory numbers on the performance cars like 340 equipped units were intentionally held back for insurance purposes. For example, a T/A 340 6 bbl was rated at 290 horsepower from the factory. JBA Speedshop (JBA Headers) had a, rebuilt to stock spec, T/A engine on their dyno and it made 358 hp and 347 lb/ft with a tune up.
Now, add some boost to that thing to make it go from "Neat" to "Wow"!
wouldn't that be considered a gross figure on an engine dyno though so not far off the 290hp net that was rated?
 
wouldn't that be considered a gross figure on an engine dyno though so not far off the 290hp net that was rated?

275hp for the 4bbl and 290hp for the 6bbl were both Gross numbers
Big difference between Gross J607 vs Net J1349 that new engines rate at
upload_2022-2-21_17-30-14.png



Cold Gross crank J607 Hp of a 3.6L is probably closer to 330-340hp

100% Stock 1970 340 Dyno Sounds pretty close to stock 275hp
"The 340 fired on the first spin of the crank, and was given the customary 20-minute break in. We loaded the Superflow, pulled the handle, and had our baseline figures: 281.3hp at 5200 rpm and 328.5 lbs/ft at 3900 rpm"
 
Last edited:
im so confused by this . the penastar 3.6 came with nag1 on them , and so does the gen3 hemi. how are they no the same ( LA style ) bolt pattern ? did they make slight different trans for the 6s vs the 8s ?

dodge says the 3.6 penastar uses same motor mount as the 5.7 hemi


If a 727 bolts right to a gen3 hemi then 727 should bolt right to the penastar 3.6.

can anyone clear this up ?

also this thread bounces back from the 3.5 v6 and to the 3.6. so im confused there too



3.6L Pentastar Transmission Options

I had a hard time finding info about what actually bolts to a 3.6L so I figured I'd consolidate all I've found out so far.

First off the Bellhousing bolt pattern is not even close to a 3GHemi/Small Block, not by a long shot. This Autocad drawing I made shows differences. The 3.6L in GREEN and the LA SB bolt pattern in White

View attachment 1714976339

The 3.6 Pentastar Bellhousing most closely resembles the 2000 and newer Aluminum Block 3.5 and 4.0L SOHC[see below]. I haven't 100% confirmed it, but the resemblance is there as seen by the unique pair of bolt holes near the top of the bell.

View attachment 1714976525


AUTOMATICS
The most obvious choice for a RWD swap would be to use a NAG1 from a +2012 Wrangler. The NAG1 swap has been done more than a few times when mated to a Hemi so it has more R&D to support it as opposed to the newer 8 & 9 Speeds.

Wranglers are most all 4WD so you don't need the whole transmission JUST the bellhousing. I've come to find out that a popular swap for your brand new +$37K Jeep is to spend another $15K-$20K to install a Hemi & pitch the 3.6L [Jeep guys are crazy]. They do this by simply SWAPPING THE BELL HOUSING from a LX Hemi NAG1 onto the Wrangler's 4WD NAG1. So 3.6L NAG1 Bellhousings are actually readily available as "new" take-off. Take-offs like this one shown below go for about $75 to $125 all day.

Again, the 3.5L Trans from 06-10 LX MIGHT bolt the 3.6L but might not. They used a "weaker" 42RLE 4 speed anyway so the 5 speed NAG1 would be a better choice imo. Just take a Hemi NAG1 and bolt on the Wrangler 3.6L Bellhousing.
View attachment 1714976350


MANUAL Trans

Big issue here is there's only 1 OE option but its not a good one. The ONLY manual trans to bolt behind a 3.6L was a NSG370 6-Speed but ONLY 4WD as far as I've found. Novak has decent info on it.
CONS: 3.6 versions Harder to find[$$], Poor Gearing, Big Boned, Shifter position less than ideal, Goofy Driveshaft, Integral Bellhousing that is part of the Case.
PROS: Bolt on

Here's the NSG370 Gear Ratios 1st-6th

4.46 2.61 1.72 1.25 1.00 0.79
Not the best spread especially that 1st gear,,good for Rock Crawling but maybe not much else.

Jeeps used the NSG370 since 05 and if/when there was a rare occasion for a RWD, they just used the same darn 4WD trans but instead of bolting on a transfer case, they used this Goofy CV type driveshaft. Slick idea and I love the CV and damper but that doesnt make it easy to find or cheap. That shaft is ~$500 new and then you probably still have to cut it.
View attachment 1714976372

Tremec TKO and T5
A TKO500/600 seems like a decent route. Everything from the Trans back has been already figured out so it's a welcome relief from the R&D and fabrication associated with this swap.

QuickTime now makes a Bellhousing to mount a TKO500/600 + Hydraulic TB behind a 3.6L. Thank Shannon at Redline Gauge Works for that[he's doing the same swap]. Part number is RM-4070 msrp $1132

Here it is on a trial fit

Pros: Easy TKO bolt-on
Cons: Cost, Weight, ONLY GM TKO, ONLY Hydraulic TB
View attachment 1714976373

T5
This is my choice for now. Its 1/2 the weight(80lb) of the TKO(160lb), widespread availability, upgrades, and plenty strong. I picked up a Ford Racing Z-spec version a few months ago at a very reasonably price.

Gear Ratios 1st-5th
2.95, 1.94, 1.34, 1.00, .63

The big issue I have is that the QuickTime bellhousing is TKO ONLY. While most other QT bells are cut for both TKO & T5 trans, the RM4070 for the 3.6L is only made fora GM TKO. Getting a Custom bell from QT would cost an additional $450 on top of the $1099. That was a bit too much for my budget. But I think I found a possible 2nd option.

Since I was going for light weight, the rather hefty QT Bell wasn't optimal but was the only game in town. Also, my T5 would have been a no go or I'd have to spend a couple grand for a TKO. So i took another look at the ONLY other "Bellhousing" on the planet for a 3.6L,,,,,the NAG1 auto

The Jeep NAG1 auto bell is Aluminum, so its very light. Its also readily available and barely $100. So the way I see it, I can put a few hundred dollars in it machining it to bolt on the T5 and still be far ahead in terms of Cost.

There are also
numerous "T5 adapter plates" sold to bolt a T5 on to nearly anything. So mounting plates of various thicknesses and offset are available right off the shelf. This means I just need to find the right plate and then get the NAG1 bell cut for the T5 Bearing retainer and 4 mounting bolts. Seems easy enough

I found a "new take off" Bell for just $70 and it's on its way. I'll get it measured to see where the T5 needs to be to properly spaced from the engine.

View attachment 1714976379

View attachment 1714976378
 
im so confused by this . the penastar 3.6 came with nag1 on them , and so does the gen3 hemi. how are they no the same ( LA style ) bolt pattern ? did they make slight different trans for the 6s vs the 8s ?

dodge says the 3.6 penastar uses same motor mount as the 5.7 hemi


If a 727 bolts right to a gen3 hemi then 727 should bolt right to the penastar 3.6.

can anyone clear this up ?

also this thread bounces back from the 3.5 v6 and to the 3.6. so im confused there too
3.6 pentastar and small block/Hemi use different bellhousing bolt patterns, same way that the slant 6 and small block/Hemi use different bolt patterns.

As for the 3.5 to 3.6 talk. Dodge used a 3.5 v6 from 2006-2010 and then a completely different designed 3.6 engine from 2011 until current.
 
not talking about the 3.5 . Only 3.6 penastar . I get many things take different patterns like slants a d la and big blocks . What I don’t understand is if I can buy a new challenger with a 3.6 pen star in it and I could pull that out and put an a 5.7 hemi and use the transmission is still in the car how do they not share the same pattern? Dodge says you can get the 3.6 Pennstar or the 57 hemi with the same transmission backing it up. Dodge also says the motor mounts are the same part number


3.6 pentastar and small block/Hemi use different bellhousing bolt patterns, same way that the slant 6 and small block/Hemi use different bolt patterns.

As for the 3.5 to 3.6 talk. Dodge used a 3.5 v6 from 2006-2010 and then a completely different designed 3.6 engine from 2011 until current.
 
that if a new challenger you can get a 3.6 with the same transmission on the back of it as the 5.7 hemi and the 5.7 hemi bolts directly to a 727 or an 833 transmission then why can’t the 3.6. unless dodge transmission that they’re saying is the same for both motors is not actually the same.


not talking about the 3.5 . Only 3.6 penastar . I get many things take different patterns like slants a d la and big blocks . What I don’t understand is if I can buy a new challenger with a 3.6 pen star in it and I could pull that out and put an a 5.7 hemi and use the transmission is still in the car how do they not share the same pattern? Dodge says you can get the 3.6 Pennstar or the 57 hemi with the same transmission backing it up. Dodge also says the motor mounts are the same part number
 
not talking about the 3.5 . Only 3.6 penastar . I get many things take different patterns like slants a d la and big blocks . What I don’t understand is if I can buy a new challenger with a 3.6 pen star in it and I could pull that out and put an a 5.7 hemi and use the transmission is still in the car how do they not share the same pattern? Dodge says you can get the 3.6 Pennstar or the 57 hemi with the same transmission backing it up. Dodge also says the motor mounts are the same part number
You can’t. If you put a Hemi in a v6 car, you need to swap the transmissions too.
 
that if a new challenger you can get a 3.6 with the same transmission on the back of it as the 5.7 hemi and the 5.7 hemi bolts directly to a 727 or an 833 transmission then why can’t the 3.6. unless dodge transmission that they’re saying is the same for both motors is not actually the same.
They’re the same transmission with different bellhousing pattern. Same as you could get a 727 behind anything from a slant 6 to a 426 Hemi.
 
I’m looking to do the 3.6 to a 727 or use the automatic trans that is on the 3.6 already that’s in my car. To put in my duster and maybe my challenger too
 
Dodge - just said nag1 stays in car if you were taking you six out of your challenger if putting in a 5.7 . Says nothing to swap so I’m getting conflicting information . They said the v6 trans and hemi trans are the same
 
-
Back
Top