They do have...…. oh never mind.
A friend gave me a bag of mini's so I was trying different ones and even mixed a little 7-up in. I found Smirnoff Coconut made quite a nice potent fruity mixer. May have to try it on a larger levelSo is mine. I might have four shots left. I am gonna try Peach Crown Royal next I think.
I saw that. I wonder if they would allow me on the lake with that.Tike Manheim has a 2 1/2 ton wwII amphibious truck up for auction, just on the news!
Ugh man them things are death traps. My dad had one, sold it in 1994. There was a lake north of Terre Haute that we used to take it on, was great if the thing didnt hit something or bog down, but if it stopped moving, it would literally start slowly sinking in the water. It’s almost like the buoyancy was just enough to float if no one was in it. But loaded, it’d sink fast if it stopped moving.
A friend gave me a bag of mini's so I was trying different ones and even mixed a little 7-up in. I found Smirnoff Coconut made quite a nice potent fruity mixer. May have to try it on a larger level
Too many close calls for me to ever get on one again. And if your lake is large enough to get tall waves from wind, don’t be out there when it is waving. It’ll swap the thing and sink like a rock. They don’t have pumpsDidn't know that. This lake is deep!
So you've had it tested, or know it is poison ivy, and not some other skin problem?
Now a PT boat would be great!A guy I knew in HI piced up a WWII PT boat. I helped him do some things on it that was cool!
Powered by a Packard I seeA guy I knew in HI piced up a WWII PT boat. I helped him do some things on it that was cool!
Would think most of the wear would be on the nose - and for that we can reference the lift spec.And how much have they worn since new??? It would be difficult to find an original cam with minimal wear to use as a bench mark....
That's the point - did you read the other thread? Chrysler book specs are not at .006" valve. They are based on the intersection of two lines on the cam drawing. That's what Wyrm's written and it seems correct. IIRC he said it works out that the book spec on the opening side is around .008 but not exact.Ken can bump the lobe to get it back to the factory spec, but can't raise the exhaust lift the .006" to get it exactly to the factory book spec... But he can make one to the factory duration, lobe centerlines, and lobe separation and it will only be .006" less lift than the factory spec...
??? Mega Parts USA - Reproduction, NOS and Used Mopar Muscle Car PartsHey as you may or may not remember I now have the correct Carter carb on the car. I'm still running the fuel line from the fuel pump to carb that I used for the Edlebrock. Difference is the Edlebrock off the fuel line to the carb used a short piece of rubber to connect to the carb. The Carter has a fitting on the side into the fuel line
I ordered a fuel line from in-line. We laid it out yesterday, for a comparison and "how's it look" and it doesn't look like it comes close to a fit. It looks nothing like the fuel line I have in now. Looking for a recommendation as to where I can find the correct fuel line for a 67 383.
I woke up at 2:30 and tried to go to my recliner, but can't get comfortable enough to get back to sleep...
Plus my poison ivy is back on my forearms and top of my legs and is bothering me... I'm almost out of the ointment the Dr. prescribed and looked up some home remedies and trying one of them... apple cider vinegar and water 3 - 4 times per day...
AMS obsoleteHey as you may or may not remember I now have the correct Carter carb on the car. I'm still running the fuel line from the fuel pump to carb that I used for the Edlebrock. Difference is the Edlebrock off the fuel line to the carb used a short piece of rubber to connect to the carb. The Carter has a fitting on the side into the fuel line
I ordered a fuel line from in-line. We laid it out yesterday, for a comparison and "how's it look" and it doesn't look like it comes close to a fit. It looks nothing like the fuel line I have in now. Looking for a recommendation as to where I can find the correct fuel line for a 67 383.
Trying to get a 340 cam made?That's the point - did you read the other thread? Chrysler book specs are not at .006" valve. They are based on the intersection of two lines on the cam drawing. That's what Wyrm's written and it seems correct. IIRC he said it works out that the book spec on the opening side is around .008 but not exact.