grimreaper
Cross Member
Baldwin or Wix here. No Fram for me. Cut one open, even their upper end models, and youll see why.....
Wix are great, i use them on my wifes minivan.
.
300 dollar oil filter.
..
what ..... is there such thing?
Here is at least a study with some testing rather then just cutting them open and taking pictures
http://www.gmtruckcentral.com/articles/oilfilterstudy.html
Yes, it is some testing.
And the author goes on to admit that it's extremely subjective and is no way comparable to standardized SAE testing.
But, then again, all the arguments in the world on this subject are extremely subjective. Oil filter brands, just like the brand of oil itself, for the most part is subjective. Everyone hates on one brand or the other, and everyone loves on one brand or the other, without being able to truly give out a response that isn't based on emotion. It's exactly what the manufacturers want and the gimmicks they employ to market the product.
I've had good luck with this brand. Someone else has had good luck with this brand. Someone has had bad luck with the brand I prefer while I've had bad luck with the brand someone else prefers. See the word "luck" being used in a lot of these discussions.
When a customer asks me which filter brand I prefer when making a recommendation out of the ones we sell, I "prefer" Purolator Classic. Why? Because it's an economical filter and I've had "good luck" with them.
So do you have a comparison of the SAE tests? You would win the internet peace prize if you did. All we know is every filter out there passes the SAE stapeace and the meaningful test is optional and run biased by the manufacturers themselves not independently. Oh and Fram does great with their Ultra in that test as well.
I know I posted this pic early on.... Look at the concentration of folds in the FL1A filter in the above comparison. That equates to a significant amount of filter area. And yes... made in USA.
Looking for a fight or just being an ***? I don't need to post such a thing as the author of the test you posted said just that. If you have a problem with that statement, then take it up with the author of the study you posted and not me. Don't just look at the page you posted, but read his own comments on the forum in which he posted it.
He's the one who said his own testing is subjective. If you're using it as scientific proof, then that's your problem, since the author of the study says it isn't.
The issue, seems to me, is that you're defending Fram against the naysayers. Again, it's subjective. You like Fram. Other guys don't. Don't like that, take it up with them, as I haven't said one word or the other about Fram filters. You'll also notice I haven't said what I personally use, just what I recommend as a good filter for the value.
No I said you would win the peace prize because this same discussion comes up on every automotive forum on a regular basis. Why because all filters pass the SAE test which show that all filters work better then they need to which was my original point. The minimopar comparison only cuts them up and looks at them, the comparison I put up at least runs oil thorough them and compares what comes out on a test paper which is more scientific then the other comparison. I don't "like" Fram or any other particular brand, I don't care, I buy what seems like a good bang for the buck, any name brand middle of the road filter that is on sale. Sometimes Fram, sometimes, Wx, sometimes Purolator, sometimes who knows. I change my oil between 3000-5000 and replace the filter then so it doesn't matter.
Lot of people here smarter than me of whom I respect their opinion a lot but I have been using Fram for 40 years on my race cars and all without 1 oil related failure. Your experiences may vary.
I love how they try to make the NAPA Gold look better than every single filter there. ^^
Click on the Motorcraft comparison. Then read the results. The Motorcraft has more media. Not only is the media taller, but it is also longer, yet in the photographs, they bunch the Motorcraft media together closer so that it appears shorter, when it is actually 7.5" longer.
Just like I always say. Never trust the opinion of an article if the source has something to sell.
Don't forget the 'extra glue' comments.