340john
Well-Known Member
over the years I had 22 four speed Mopars, including 3 hemi's, 4 440 six packs and 2 340 six packs.440's, 383's 340's etc. all motors, all body styles...you name it. There is nothing like the feel of a four speed car !
True this ^ ^. So the answer the question is probably something like fun and slow(er).
We're talking about a daily driver with stock-type stuff, you know A833 - not Lencos and high end pro stuff like that.No a 4sp is faster.A well built auto is more consistent but that if you have a well built 4sp.Something to think about.I would take a clutchless 4sp any day over a well built auto. Just saying the best class to check this out is SSH class Mark
We're talking about a daily driver with stock-type stuff, you know A833 - not Lencos and high end pro stuff like that.
I love to shift myself. I will do it till the left leg cannot handle it. :burnout:
Your arm feels like your digging a mile long, foot deep ditch with a shovel when rowing gears in traffic. Gets old. Just sayin. You can manual shift a auto in stock fourm.
Glad to see you decided to not let the car get the best of you.
I know everyone like to rave about how stout the A833 is, and the 18-spline hemi inputs certainly are even more so. But the problem with the 4-spd/fun combination is the tranny becomes the drivetrain weak link in a high-powered-car with good traction.
I'm not talking about things "letting go." Long term wear and tear on a daily driver is the issue.From my experience an 8 3/4 will let go before an 833 will.
I have always been a 4 speed fan. I have owned and driven several a and b body cars over the years.
Go for it, but my word of to advice to you is make sure you get a COMPLETE set up for your car and don't fool around trying to mix and match parts. Install new bushings, clips, etc. in the linkage or you'll HATE it. Make sure the transmission is good inside.
Converting to a 4 speed can be VERY expensive and frustrating especially if you try to cut corners.
The 4-speed is fun to drive, but not the way to go fast. It's literally impossible for a human using a clutch and stick to achieve anything approaching the efficiency of a well built auto with the right torque converter combo.
There are exceptions to every rule. Rare exceptions, in this category. We're talking a high-level generalized comparo here. Autos rule at the track.The one car that comes to mind is the winner on Pinks in a early Duster.
Tell that to the guys who smoked a new clutch.Stick shifts have zero or near zero slippage.
So you are comparing a good stick to a sloppy auto? Look up "apples and oranges." Anybody who is serious about the subjects which you speak know better than to use a stock torque converter and valve body. You'll be looking at taillights coming out of the turns after breaking traction rowing for the right gear. OTOH...For road driving, road racing, road touring, they rule and with good parts and a clean install and properly set up are double the enjoyment and way more efficient than a loose converter automatic (excluding efficiently set up lock up TC systems).
Which ALWAYS happens to every manual transmission that ever hit the road if it was driven aggressively far enough or long enough behind enough power. And MUCH sooner than an auto in an apples-to-apples comparison behind a powerful engine....if your stick shift system is all jibbered up and a cobble of junky worn out poorly assembled parts it can be a cantankerous and massive pain in the butt to drive.