It was 9-1 compression. Not to bad for the era.Say it ain't so, not with that super low cr
It was 9-1 compression. Not to bad for the era.Say it ain't so, not with that super low cr
Not the factory 4bbl 360 headed 318, pretty sure they had same pistons ?It was 9-1 compression. Not to bad for the era.
i just ran 13.9's with a 100% factory stock block 318 with about common factory 340 parts. cast intake, about same cam, 3.55's, still 318 heads but headers and a little better stall. street tires.I understand why it's generally better to build 340/360 over 273/318, but can't understand why people can't wrap their head around if you put performance parts on a 273/318 or whatever it's gonna perform, for non stroker were generally talking 250-450 hp, easily obtainable power with the parts we have now days. Don't need to do a Nascar level build to get these powers numbers out of a 273/318 engine some might not like the results compared to similar hp 340/360 fair enough but can we stop acting like we need a Nascar type team to build a high hp 273/318 it's all similar parts as what a similar hp 340/360 would need.
It's just drives me nuts how people act like getting performance out of a 273/318 or 383 or whatever gonna be this crazy extra hard endeavor, like the laws of physics stops under a 4" bore sbm or a 4.32" bbm.i just ran 13.9's with a 100% factory stock block 318 with about common factory 340 parts. cast intake, about same cam, 3.55's, still 318 heads but headers and a little better stall. street tires.
325 will do it, this is the most accurate online calc, I've found, Engine Horsepower Calculator From Trap SpeedIt’s like NC said above. Low 12’s in a 3300 pound car takes about 375 honest horsepower to run low 12’s. You might not get the ET but the MPH should show enough to get a low 12 pass.
You already know this but with the bore limits it makes it that much harder for the same cylinder head to make power.
A 340 at 375 hp is 1.1029 hp/cid.
A 273 at 375 hp is 1.3736 hp/cid.
Two tenths of a point don’t sound like much but when you are bore limited it’s a bear to get it.
Doing the same math a 408 is .9191 hp/cid.
Even with a 4.56 gear and a 27 inch tall tire about 6500 rpm. For some guys that’s a deal breaker.
i just ran 13.9's with a 100% factory stock block 318 with about common factory 340 parts. cast intake, about same cam, 3.55's, still 318 heads but headers and a little better stall. street tires.
And I just put out there my numbers to show that it doesn't take much. Anyone can do it. How many factory 340's ran 13.9's with 3.55's? Yet an untouched, used 318 block w/318 heads runs it with the most simple, affordable parts available.It's just drives me nuts how people act like getting performance out of a 273/318 or 383 or whatever gonna be this crazy extra hard endeavor, like the laws of physics stops under a 4" bore sbm or a 4.32" bbm.
Say you put a set of J heads with 9:1, 650 airgap, headers and xe268h cam with the appropriate stall and gears for best 1/4 mile time for each, 273, 318, 340, 360 there all gonna perform decently not say there gonna do the exactly same 1/4 mile times but doubt there gonna be super crazily apart.
That what I like about your builds, it proves what most of gibberish the other keep saying is wrong or at least has some holes in their theories. Mainly it don't take much even with a lowly 318 to get decent performance without breaking the bank, we need you try you magic on a 273 now lolAnd I just put out there my numbers to show that it doesn't take much. Anyone can do it. How many factory 340's ran 13.9's with 3.55's? Yet an untouched, used 318 block w/318 heads runs it with the most simple, affordable parts available.
Cam duration, Compression ratio, what's been done to the cylinder heads, carburetor modifications, transmission modifications, gear ratio, stall converter, type of headers, ignition system.My 273 runs low 12s in my 65 Cuda, with a .400 lift cam, 318 heads, stock intake and carb, but there are so many other items it takes to make it go that quick, transmission is a big one.
Be surprised if he gives away his secrets. I imagine it's the sum total of finding thousands of little advantages all over the car.Cam duration, Compression ratio, what's been done to the cylinder heads, carburetor modifications, transmission modifications, gear ratio, stall converter, type of headers, ignition system.
I agree.Be surprised if he gives away his secrets. I imagine it's the sum total of finding thousands of little advantages all over the car.
I'd start in the rear and work your way forward. I'd guess 4.88's, 8" converter, ...... keep swimming up stream! But still, it ran the number in a different way! I like his builds by the way.Cam duration, Compression ratio, what's been done to the cylinder heads, carburetor modifications, transmission modifications, gear ratio, stall converter, type of headers, ignition system.
I wonder what times he would've run if he put the same money and time into a 360? You got great results from your 360. Just sayingI'd start in the rear and work your way forward. I'd guess 4.88's, 8" converter, ...... keep swimming up stream! But still, it ran the number in a different way! I like his builds by the way.
But that would just eliminate the purpose of his car's intent. It's just like my 360, there are a ton of faster engines and even parts that would move my Duster much faster, but for what I was doing it would diminish the intent. Now if the intent changes, then great, look for quicker times.I wonder what times he would've run if he put the same money and time into a 360? You got great results from your 360. Just saying
Probably faster but it would be mostly about the head intake etc.. Able to flow more air/fuel which is more overall potential.I wonder what times he would've run if he put the same money and time into a 360? You got great results from your 360. Just saying
I wonder what times he would've run if he put the same money and time into a 360? You got great results from your 360. Just saying
let me elaborate some more on this^^^ . My first intent was to run a 13.99 with a stock 360 4bbl, stock exhaust manifolds, stock converter, and 2.45 gears. Everyone and their 2 yr old son knows those aren't go fast parts. But it was a personal challenge to myself. I've moved the goal just a little. But some do certain things for a class they are racing in. It's all about the intended purpose, not that all believe it's the "best choice" of all choices to go fast.But that would just eliminate the purpose of his car's intent. It's just like my 360, there are a ton of faster engines and even parts that would move my Duster much faster, but for what I was doing it would diminish the intent. Now if the intent changes, then great, look for quicker times.
I think if 87 cubes were added, you can take the "probably" out of it.Probably faster but it would be mostly about the head intake etc.. Able to flow more air/fuel which is more overall potential.
To protect me from the internet policeI think if 87 cubes were added, you can take the "probably" out of it.
This is what I'm talking about!! I like it!!My 273 runs low 12s in my 65 Cuda, with a .400 lift cam, 318 heads, stock intake and carb, but there are so many other items it takes to make it go that quick, transmission is a big one.
I can do a run down for you guys, rear gear is 4.86, with a 26 inch tire, the transmission is the fancy part of the car, all aluminum drums and a lower first gear, A&A valve body, Converter is about 5300, i wanted 6k but not enough torque in the engine, crappy hooker headers, carb was done by a guy that does carbs for Stock Eliminator which is what this car is, and i think it is the best carb i have ever had, Compression is 12.2 with the factory dome, heads are stock ports with the right valve job and valves, and the ignition as always for me is Daytona Sensors. its not what parts you use, its how you use them, the right combination is the key. I have to weight min of 3115, i am at 3140, have all the carpet 2 seats, stock dash with AM radio and factory tach.Cam duration, Compression ratio, what's been done to the cylinder heads, carburetor modifications, transmission modifications, gear ratio, stall converter, type of headers, ignition system.
My 410ci goes to 7700rpm, they rev…I don't want a 4.00 inch stroke , I want to rev with a standard stroke 340 or 273. Leaning towards a 340. I already have one in my Dart and grabbed a standard bore 340 block for $250. No caps but I'm not using stock caps anyway.
Cometic will make whatever you want.Matt Steen told me that. Pistons are now commonplace.Correct me if Im wrong but isnt the parts selection for 273s limited? things like gasket kits that don't work or aren't available? OR is it true that a fel pro gasket kit is out there for 273? i think in terms of overall headache on a build .
273 head is the same as 318 in port volume. If you put a 340/360 head on a 273, you’ll lose so much airspeed,compression,and shroud or crash valves etc.Feel free to enlighten us now that we have your opening statement.
Not even close. I ran 1.88 intake J heads on a 273. My favorite engine of all time.273 head is the same as 318 in port volume. If you put a 340/360 head on a 273, you’ll lose so much airspeed,compression,and shroud or crash valves etc.
The 273 doesn’t flow enough air to warrant big heads, 170ish cfm (stock) puts the engines peak horsepower potential at just over 6grand.