Chev's 302/327/350 all dyno about 350-355 hp with headers, but with a fairly aggressive factory cam, wonder what the 340 would make with similar cam.Hot rod got 320 HP out of a dead stock 340, and 352 HP replacing the manifolds with headers.
"On factory claims of 275 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 340 lb-ft (3,200 rpm), we got 320 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 368 lb-ft at 3,500 rpm. So it's clear Mopar understated the facts by 45 horsepower and 28 lb-ft. Then we replaced the manifolds with a set of headers and got 352.1 horsepower and 395.9 lb-ft (at 3,200 rpm)—77.1 horsepower and 55.9 lb-ft higher than published peak claims."
How Bad Did Mopar’s 340 beat Ford & Chevy? Shocking New Data!
[/URL][/URL]
That was done for insurance purposes and because if the buying public knew how close it was to the 383s, there wouldn't have been as much market for a 383.Hot rod got 320 HP out of a dead stock 340, and 352 HP replacing the manifolds with headers.
"On factory claims of 275 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 340 lb-ft (3,200 rpm), we got 320 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 368 lb-ft at 3,500 rpm. So it's clear Mopar understated the facts by 45 horsepower and 28 lb-ft. Then we replaced the manifolds with a set of headers and got 352.1 horsepower and 395.9 lb-ft (at 3,200 rpm)—77.1 horsepower and 55.9 lb-ft higher than published peak claims."
How Bad Did Mopar’s 340 beat Ford & Chevy? Shocking New Data!
[/URL]
It wasn't "dead stock". They used machining operations that the factory never did (honed with a torque plate bolted on,etc), it had a bowl hog ran through the heads and it had roller rockers installed. Essentially , it was blueprinted. Attention to detail and precision machining makes a difference. The factory just kinda threw them together.Hot rod got 320 HP out of a dead stock 340, and 352 HP replacing the manifolds with headers.
"On factory claims of 275 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 340 lb-ft (3,200 rpm), we got 320 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 368 lb-ft at 3,500 rpm. So it's clear Mopar understated the facts by 45 horsepower and 28 lb-ft. Then we replaced the manifolds with a set of headers and got 352.1 horsepower and 395.9 lb-ft (at 3,200 rpm)—77.1 horsepower and 55.9 lb-ft higher than published peak claims."
How Bad Did Mopar’s 340 beat Ford & Chevy? Shocking New Data!
[/URL]
You are correct.What's wrong with these people-Have to put a damn Edelbrock on where a Thermoquad belongs.. I guess Ole Nick doesn't know everything, he said the TQ that he had was an 800 from a mid 70's 400-wrong. It's an aftermarket 800 with an electric choke, on top all 400's had the 850, as far as I know.
340 never was much in an E or B-body, kind of a slug. lolThat was done for insurance purposes and because if the buying public knew how close it was to the 383s, there wouldn't have been as much market for a 383.
Flame on!
One of those Peterson rags did a stock 340 rebuild back in the 1980s or maybe very early '90s. They got similar results with a 3-angle valve job on stock ports and using factory rockers (same-ratio rollers don't add HP anyhow). The only real difference was boring it +.030", and they got 318 horsepower.Hot rod got 320 HP out of a dead stock 340, and 352 HP replacing the manifolds with headers.
"On factory claims of 275 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 340 lb-ft (3,200 rpm), we got 320 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 368 lb-ft at 3,500 rpm. So it's clear Mopar understated the facts by 45 horsepower and 28 lb-ft."
I wonder the same thing all the time, although in the case of content creators it's usually due to "promotional consideration" (free or deeply-discounted product).What's wrong with these people-Have to put a damn Edelbrock on where a Thermoquad belongs..
i skip through his videosWow... that was agonizing. That video should've been 30 minutes shorter, and the narrator's hyper-enunciation is irritating. That was the first of his videos I've seen.
*Marks YouTube's "Do not recommend this channel" icon*
in my mind i was comparing it more to the 71 similar cr and 2.02 with more cam, didn't catch which cam their using."We got 100HP more out of a 340 than the factory. All we did was upsize the valves, add 1.7 points of compression, and install a hotter cam. Please ignore the fact that the original number was through the full OE 2-inch exhaust system and mufflers while running all the accessories, while ours was gross HP with open pipes and not even running a water pump."
Does that mean the 273 non Commando made More that 180HP?Hot rod got 320 HP out of a dead stock 340, and 352 HP replacing the manifolds with headers.
"On factory claims of 275 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 340 lb-ft (3,200 rpm), we got 320 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 368 lb-ft at 3,500 rpm. So it's clear Mopar understated the facts by 45 horsepower and 28 lb-ft. Then we replaced the manifolds with a set of headers and got 352.1 horsepower and 395.9 lb-ft (at 3,200 rpm)—77.1 horsepower and 55.9 lb-ft higher than published peak claims."
How Bad Did Mopar’s 340 beat Ford & Chevy? Shocking New Data!
[/URL]
All it means is factory gross hp are unreliable they would manipulate to suit their needs.Does that mean the 273 non Commando made More that 180HP?
Agreed! THEN, I wanna see, 1 change at a time, pull after pull, with 2nd change then pull, 3rd, etc. Dig?I like how when all these guys do a 340 article and subsequent dyno pulls, they can never, never, EVER leave well enough alone and then say "it's stock". Just once, ALL I wanna see is one that's actually blueprinted to CHRYSLER'S spec and none other. Like get the deck heights right, the chambers the right size, you know, get the compression blueprinted and then just leave the rest ALONE.